Počet záznamů: 1  

On the Track of C/overt Research: Lessons From Taking Ethnographic Ethics to the Extreme

  1. 1.
    0478833 - SOÚ 2019 RIV US eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Virtová, Tereza - Stöckelová, Tereza - Krásná, H.
    On the Track of C/overt Research: Lessons From Taking Ethnographic Ethics to the Extreme.
    Qualitative Inquiry. Roč. 24, č. 7 (2018), s. 453-463. ISSN 1077-8004
    Grant CEP: GA ČR GA15-16452S; GA ČR(CZ) GJ16-18371Y
    Institucionální podpora: RVO:68378025 ; RVO:67985955
    Klíčová slova: collaborative ethnography * informed consent * institutional review board (IRB)
    Kód oboru RIV: AO - Sociologie, demografie; AO - Sociologie, demografie (FLU-F)
    Obor OECD: Sociology; Sociology (FLU-F)
    Impakt faktor: 1.795, rok: 2018
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077800417732090

    Despite the growing body of literature that critically assesses the ambiguous impacts of institutional review boards (IRBs) on anthropological research, the key standards on which the IRB evaluations are based often remain unquestioned. By exposing the genealogy of an undercover research in which the authors participated as ethnographer, supervisor, and research participant, this article problematizes some of these standards and addresses the issues of power dynamics in research, informed consent, and anonymization in published work. It argues that rather than addressing genuine ethical dilemmas, IRB standards and the ethical fiction of informed consent mainly protect researchers from having to openly face
    the uncertainties of fieldwork. As an alternative, the authors put forth the notion of c/overt research, which perceives any research as processual and, in effect, becoming overt only during the research process itself. As such, it forces researchers to cultivate sensitivity to research ethics.
    Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0274882
     
Počet záznamů: 1