Počet záznamů: 1  

More Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries\n

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0523658
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JOstatní články
    NázevMore Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries
    Tvůrce(i) Simon, Rita (USP-I) ORCID
    Zdroj.dok.European Review of Private Law. - : Kluwer Law International - ISSN 0928-9801
    Roč. 27, č. 6 (2020), s. 1389-1410
    Poč.str.22 s.
    Forma vydáníOnline - E
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.NL - Nizozemsko
    Klíč. slovaNew Deal for Consumers ; representative actions ; collective redress mechanisms ; Visegrad 4 countries ; more flexible enhanced administrative measures
    Vědní obor RIVAG - Právní vědy
    Obor OECDLaw
    Způsob publikováníPouze metadata
    Institucionální podporaUSP-I - RVO:68378122
    AnotaceClassic injunction actions before a court are very rarely used instruments in the Visegrad 4 countries, they are too expensive, too long proceedings, with uncertain results. On one hand, a lost court case can cause insolvency for the organization and on other hand a won case cannot ensure a direct compensation of the harmed consumer. Therefore, the Visegrad 4 consumer protection organizations tend to move to other redresses. After a short introduction to existing injunction actions and their shortcuts in the Visegrad 4 counties (1), the article explains why the way of amending representative actions, as recommended by the new Commission Proposal cannot provide more efficient or effective justice in the Visegrad 4 countries (2), and based on the best practices of the Visegrad 4 countries I will propose alternative instruments, such as public enforcement and more flexible enhanced consumer measures by administrative authorities, which have proved quite efficient in resolving mass harm situations (3).
    PracovištěÚstav státu a práva
    KontaktIveta Bůžková, iveta.buzkova@ilaw.cas.cz, Tel.: 221 990 714
    Rok sběru2020
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.