Počet záznamů: 1  

Resonance Tube or Lax Vox?

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0469140
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevResonance Tube or Lax Vox?
    Tvůrce(i) Tyrmi, J. (FI)
    Radolf, Vojtěch (UT-L) RID, ORCID
    Horáček, Jaromír (UT-L) RID, ORCID
    Laukkanen, A. M. (CZ)
    Celkový počet autorů4
    Zdroj.dok.Journal of Voice. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0892-1997
    Roč. 31, č. 4 (2017), s. 430-437
    Poč.str.8 s.
    Forma vydáníTištěná - P
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.US - Spojené státy americké
    Klíč. slovaflow resistance ; EGG ; voice therapy ; water resistance therapy ; air pressure in phonation
    Vědní obor RIVBI - Akustika a kmity
    Obor OECDAcoustics
    CEPGA16-01246S GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR
    Institucionální podporaUT-L - RVO:61388998
    UT WOS000406147000006
    EID SCOPUS85008430178
    DOI10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.024
    AnotaceObjective. This study compares the flow resistance of Resonance tube (RT) and Lax Vox tube (LVT) when submerged 2 cm and 10 cm in water, as well as phonation into the tubes in these conditions.
    Methods. In the in vitro experiment, the air pressure for flow rates of 60-600 mL/s was measured at the tube inlet, when the outer end of the tube was submerged 2 cm and 10 cm below water surface in 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees angle. In the in vivo experiment, 14 subjects phonated in habitual loudness and loudly into both tubes, with the outer end 2 cm and 10 cm in water. RT was immersed in a 45 degrees angle and LVT in a 90 degrees angle in water. Oral pressure, contact quotient from electroglottographic signal, and sound pressure level were studied. Sensations during phonation were reported in an interview.
    Results. Flow resistance was slightly lower with LVT than with RT, and slightly lower for smaller immersion angles. In habitual loudness, transglottic pressure and frequency of oral pressure variation were lower for LVT phonation and amplitude of oral pressure variation was higher for LVT 2 cm in water. Some subjects preferred RT, whereas others preferred LVT or reported no differences between them.
    Conclusions. The tubes differed slightly in flow resistance. Higher oral pressure oscillation with LVT 2 cm in water may offer stronger massage effect on vocal folds.
    PracovištěÚstav termomechaniky
    KontaktMarie Kajprová, kajprova@it.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 053 154 ; Jana Lahovská, jaja@it.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 053 823
    Rok sběru2018
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.