Počet záznamů: 1
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0585138 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV Záznam nebyl označen do RIV Poddruh J Článek ve WOS Název Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics Tvůrce(i) Bartoš, František (UIVT-O) SAI, ORCID, RID
Maier, M. (GB)
Wagenmakers, J. E. (NL)
Nippold, F. (NL)
Doucouliagos, H. (AU)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (US)
Otte, W. M. (NL)
Sladekova, M. (GB)
Deresssa, T. K. (BE)
Bruns, S. B. (US)
Fanelli, D. (GB)
Stanley, T. D. (AU)Zdroj.dok. Research Synthesis Methods. - : Wiley - ISSN 1759-2879
Online 07 February 2024 (2024)Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. US - Spojené státy americké Klíč. slova Bayesian ; effect sizes ; evidence ; meta-analysis ; model-averaging ; publication bias ; RoBMA Obor OECD Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8) Způsob publikování Open access Institucionální podpora UIVT-O - RVO:67985807 UT WOS 001157617000001 EID SCOPUS 85184450854 DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1703 Anotace Publication selection bias undermines the systematic accumulation of evidence. To assess the extent of this problem, we survey over 68,000 meta-analyses containing over 700,000 effect size estimates from medicine (67,386/597,699), environmental sciences (199/12,707), psychology (605/23,563), and economics (327/91,421). Our results indicate that meta-analyses in economics are the most severely contaminated by publication selection bias, closely followed by meta-analyses in environmental sciences and psychology, whereas meta-analyses in medicine are contaminated the least. After adjusting for publication selection bias, the median probability of the presence of an effect decreased from 99.9% to 29.7% in economics, from 98.9% to 55.7% in psychology, from 99.8% to 70.7% in environmental sciences, and from 38.0% to 29.7% in medicine. The median absolute effect sizes (in terms of standardized mean differences) decreased from d = 0.20 to d = 0.07 in economics, from d = 0.37 to d = 0.26 in psychology, from d = 0.62 to d = 0.43 in environmental sciences, and from d = 0.24 to d = 0.13 in medicine. Pracoviště Ústav informatiky Kontakt Tereza Šírová, sirova@cs.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 053 800 Rok sběru 2025 Elektronická adresa https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1703
Počet záznamů: 1