- Parental gender preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: gender bia…
Počet záznamů: 1  

Parental gender preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: gender bias or differential costs?

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0575805
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevParental gender preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: gender bias or differential costs?
    Tvůrce(i) Maksymovych, Sergii (NHU-C)
    Appleman, William (NHU-C)
    Abramishvili, Z. (GE)
    Číslo článku22
    Zdroj.dok.Journal of Population Research. - : Springer - ISSN 1443-2447
    Roč. 40, č. 4 (2023)
    Poč.str.48 s.
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.NL - Nizozemsko
    Klíč. slovaparenting ; intrahousehold allocation ; gender gap
    Obor OECDApplied Economics, Econometrics
    Způsob publikováníOmezený přístup
    Institucionální podporaNHU-C - Cooperatio-COOP
    UT WOS001063791600002
    EID SCOPUS85170397061
    DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-023-09316-9
    AnotaceThere is much research indicating the presence of a parental preference for a particular gender of children. The main objective of this paper is to test between the two main explanations for the existence of such preference, namely differences in the costs of raising sons and daughters versus the gender bias (corresponding to parental utility derived from a child’s gender or from characteristics exclusive to that gender). First, we use recent EU-SILC data from several Balkan and Scandinavian countries to confirm that the gender of the firstborn predicts the likelihood of a given family having three children or more—a common measure of parental gender preference. We confirm son preference in certain Balkan countries and daughter preference in Scandinavian countries. Both having a first child of the preferred gender and of the more costly gender can decrease the probability of having three or more children because parents may already be content or may lack sufficient resources, respectively. Next, we use information on household consumption to differentiate the two explanations. We argue that under the differential cost hypothesis, parents of children of the more costly gender should spend more on goods for children and less on household public goods as well as on parental personal consumption. In contrast, having children of the preferred gender should increase spending on household public goods since such families have higher marriage surplus and are more stable. Our evidence corroborates the cost difference explanation in countries exhibiting daughter preference.
    PracovištěNHU-C
    KontaktTomáš Pavela, pavela@cerge-ei.cz, Tel.: 224 005 122
    Rok sběru2024
    Elektronická adresahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-023-09316-9
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.