Počet záznamů: 1  

What is a Thomist? A Historical-Speculative Consideration

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0563947
    Druh ASEPA - Abstrakt
    Zařazení RIVZáznam nebyl označen do RIV
    Zařazení RIVNení vybrán druh dokumentu
    NázevWhat is a Thomist? A Historical-Speculative Consideration
    Tvůrce(i) Jindráček, Efrem (FLU-F) ORCID, RID, SAI
    AkceInternational Thomistic Congress. Vetera novis augere. The resources of the Thomist tradition in the current context /11./
    Datum konání19.09.2022 - 24.09.2022
    Místo konáníRome
    ZeměIT - Itálie
    Typ akceWRD
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Klíč. slovaThomism ; history ; definition
    Vědní obor RIVAA - Filosofie a náboženství
    Obor OECDPhilosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
    Institucionální podporaFLU-F - RVO:67985955
    AnotaceAlthough the designation as “Thomist” is documented since the 14th century, the exact content and definition of this term must have been systematically used only in modern times, especially from the 17th to the 21st century. From then on, there are several historical and descriptive definitions. But the problem is altogether deeper and more philosophical. Is Thomism really in our thinking an independent “science”, that is, the “intelligible quality” that we can simply and necessarily discover and objectively recognize, or is it - at least partially - a doctrinal artifact of a certain historical development and compromise, which, of course, can be documented and described? Does being a good Thomist merely mean knowing and faithfully defending the doctrinal heritage of Thomas Aquinas, his pupils and school, or are the responsibilities of a true Thomist something greater? The paper presents several basic historical starting points and develops a speculative conclusion. “Thomism,” understood as an objective and rigorous science is not the mere internal understanding of Aquinas’ doctrines and arguments. Rather the most important task for a serious follower of the Thomistic school is the demonstration of Aquinas’s arguments independent from his authority and according to an adequate philosophical or theological methodology.
    PracovištěFilosofický ústav
    KontaktChlumská Simona, chlumska@flu.cas.cz ; Tichá Zuzana, asep@flu.cas.cz Tel: 221 183 360
    Rok sběru2023
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.