- The ‘Silent Guardians’ in the Fight against Corruption: The Case of N…
Počet záznamů: 1  

The ‘Silent Guardians’ in the Fight against Corruption: The Case of North Macedonia

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0524579
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevThe ‘Silent Guardians’ in the Fight against Corruption: The Case of North Macedonia
    Tvůrce(i) Tudjarovska Gjorgjievska, Emilija (SOU-Z) ORCID, RID
    Zdroj.dok.Central European Public Administration Review. - : Univerza v Ljubljani - ISSN 2591-2240
    Roč. 18, č. 1 (2020), s. 165-184
    Poč.str.20 s.
    Forma vydáníTištěná - P
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.SI - Slovinsko
    Klíč. slovaanti-corruption ; democratisation ; North Macedonia ; ombudsman ; parliament
    Vědní obor RIVAD - Politologie a politické vědy
    Obor OECDPolitical science
    Způsob publikováníOpen access
    Institucionální podporaSOU-Z - RVO:68378025
    UT WOS000528483200008
    DOI https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2020.1.08
    AnotaceImpartial public administration is a key gatekeeper against corruptive
    practices and the necessary condition for the process of democratization. Yet, in the case of North Macedonia, there is an ongoing challenge in addressing the problem of politicization of public administration. On one hand, the ombudsman holds the normative position to safeguard citizens in front of state administration bodies, to act upon the impartiality biases or other deviances of norms, and to annually report to the National Parliament. On the other hand, the parliament should be able to hold executives and institutions accountable for their actions and to act upon the ombudsman’s recommendations. However, there is a limited understanding of the role that these two institutions can play in an effective fight against corruption as part of the democratization processes. The purpose of the article is to examine the institutional gaps where the opportunities for corruption and social traps are encouraged. Based on theoretical, empirical as well as comparative observations, within single case method analysis, this article aims to examine the compliance of the theoretical fingerprints with the actual practice and provide a different angle on the institutional opportunities for social traps, in the context of unconsolidated democracies. The findings show that there is a causality between the institutional ‘silent guardian’ of the citizens and the prevalence of corruption. It also encourages further discussion on the factors that undermine the positions of the ombudsman and the parliament to take active engagement in rooting out the corruption from societies.
    PracovištěSociologický ústav
    KontaktEva Nechvátalová, eva.nechvatalova@soc.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 220 924 / linka 351
    Rok sběru2021
    Elektronická adresahttp://cepar.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/445/484
Počet záznamů: 1  

Metadata v repozitáři ASEP jsou licencována pod licencí CC0.

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.