Počet záznamů: 1
Conservation implications of forest changes caused by bark beetle management in the Šumava National Park
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0467344 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV J - Článek v odborném periodiku Poddruh J Článek ve WOS Název Conservation implications of forest changes caused by bark beetle management in the Šumava National Park Tvůrce(i) Zýval, V. (CZ)
Křenová, Zdeňka (UEK-B) RID, ORCID, SAI
Kindlmann, Pavel (UEK-B) RID, ORCID, SAIZdroj.dok. Biological Conservation. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0006-3207
Roč. 204, part B (2016), s. 394-402Poč.str. 9 s. Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. NL - Nizozemsko Klíč. slova Natura 2000 ; Forest ecosystem management ; Natural disturbances ; Bark beetles ; National park conservation policy Vědní obor RIV EH - Ekologie - společenstva CEP LO1415 GA MŠMT - Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy Institucionální podpora RVO:67179843 - RVO:67179843 UT WOS 000390968900030 EID SCOPUS 85006324072 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.001 Anotace The question, whether the forest management adopted in several European national parks following natural disturbances (windstorms, bark beetle) is in the long term the optimal one is currently widely discussed in a pan-European context. Instead of a clear management policy, however, only non-compulsory recommendations are suggested and management directives are missing. For example, it is established that non-intervention management is optimal for preserving biodiversity in mountain spruce stands, as logging diminishes biodiversity, but no such recommendation has been passed on to the managers of these stands. In the absence of such guidance park managers adopt various suboptimal strategies, which depend on who owns a particular area of the forest (private or state-owned) and their priorities. Here we present an example of this: the differences between the management practices applied by state and private owners in the central part of the Šumava NP. Using aerial photographs, we evaluated the effect of these practices by comparing the status of Natura 2000 habitats in 2004 (when the Natura 2000 area was designated), with that in 2011 (four years after the Kyrill wind storm, when the post-wind storm activities had more or less finished). The private owner logged and removed trees from significantly larger areas than the Šumava NP Authority. However, even management by the Šumava NP Authority was sometimes suboptimal: they managed some valuable habitats in a similar way to those of lower conservation value. We conclude that a clear definition of the long-term management strategy for national parks, obligatory on all owners, is critically important for the management of Natura 2000 habitats. Pracoviště Ústav výzkumu globální změny Kontakt Nikola Šviková, svikova.n@czechglobe.cz, Tel.: 511 192 268 Rok sběru 2017
Počet záznamů: 1