Počet záznamů: 1
Good consequences
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0360865 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV J - Článek v odborném periodiku Poddruh J Ostatní články Název Good consequences Tvůrce(i) Sobek, Tomáš (USP-I) ORCID Zdroj.dok. Právník. - : Ústav státu a práva AV ČR, v. v. i. - ISSN 0231-6625
Roč. 150/1, č. 6/1 TLQ (2011), s. 3-30Poč.str. 28 s. Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. CZ - Česká republika Klíč. slova retributivist theories ; consequentialism ; legal theory Vědní obor RIV AG - Právní vědy CEZ AV0Z70680506 - USP-I (2005-2011) Anotace This essay considers the problem of justification of punishment. Philosophers of criminal law developed a whole range of competing theories, which answer this question by their own manner. Of course, each of these theories has its strengths and weaknesses. Traditionally, the most pronounced among these theories are two, i.e. retributivism and consequentialism. If put very simply, the consequentialist justifications (e.g. Bentham, Sidgwick) of punishment lie in the fact that punishment is only justifiable on the basis of its good consequences, while retributivist theories (e.g. Kant, Hegel) present within their mainstream an opinion that punishment is justified only when a punished person deserves it. The author argues that we need a combined theory. Normative jurisprudence should not be satisfied with simple utilitarianism (maximization of social utility), but it should tie it to deontological constraints limitations, specifically to the requirement to respect an autonomy of an individual and his personal dignity. Pracoviště Ústav státu a práva Kontakt Iveta Bůžková, iveta.buzkova@ilaw.cas.cz, Tel.: 221 990 714 Rok sběru 2012
Počet záznamů: 1