Počet záznamů: 1
Chinese Medicine on the Move into Central Europe: A Contribution to the Debate on Correlativity and Decentering STS
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0489131 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV J - Článek v odborném periodiku Poddruh J Článek ve WOS Název Chinese Medicine on the Move into Central Europe: A Contribution to the Debate on Correlativity and Decentering STS Tvůrce(i) Stöckelová, Tereza (SOU-Z) RID, ORCID, SAI
Klepal, Jaroslav (SOU-Z) RID, ORCID, SAIZdroj.dok. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal. - : Duke University Press - ISSN 1875-2160
Roč. 12, č. 1 (2018), s. 57-79Poč.str. 23 s. Forma vydání Tištěná - P Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. US - Spojené státy americké Klíč. slova complementary and alternative medicine ; correlativity ; evidence-based medicine Vědní obor RIV AO - Sociologie, demografie Obor OECD Sociology CEP GA15-16452S GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR Institucionální podpora SOU-Z - RVO:68378025 UT WOS 000428817400004 EID SCOPUS 85046447931 DOI 10.1215/18752160-4261723 Anotace Contributing to the ongoing debate on decentering Science, Technology, and Society (STS) from Western contexts, this article elaborates on and reconsiders Wen-yuan Lin and John Law’s proposal for correlative STS („A Correlative STS,“ 2014). Like them, we empirically draw on Chinese Medicine (CM) and its relation to biomedicine, but we explore the modes by which CM was enacted in the historical, political, and sociomaterial settings of socialist and postsocialist Central Europe. We show that not only specific correlations but also correlativity itself—as the ontological stance of the actors—are situated and can shift. Our argument regarding STS is twofold. First, while Lin and Law argue that STS needs to develop an appropriate mode of betrayal when translating across ontological differences from a source language to a destination language (Western analytics), we show that in our case an ethnographer cannot find any single source language. Consequently, we argue that STS should study actors’ modes and moves of betrayal and their doing ontology as an open process. Second, unlike Lin and Law who postulate the Chinese mode of international as „subtle“and „minimalist“ and an alternative to the Western mode („Making Things Differently,“ 2013), we argue that with the rise of China and the changing world political economy STS needs to be more attentive to dominating expansions that come from non-Western locations as much as from the West. Pracoviště Sociologický ústav Kontakt Eva Nechvátalová, eva.nechvatalova@soc.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 220 924 / linka 351 Rok sběru 2019
Počet záznamů: 1