Počet záznamů: 1  

Species–area relationships in continuous vegetation: Evidence from Palaearctic grasslands

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0533926
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevSpecies–area relationships in continuous vegetation: Evidence from Palaearctic grasslands
    Tvůrce(i) Dengler, J. (DE)
    Matthews, T. J. (GB)
    Steinbauer, M. J. (DE)
    Wolfrum, S. (DE)
    Boch, S. (CH)
    Chiarucci, A. (IT)
    Conradi, T. (DE)
    Dembicz, I. (PL)
    Marcenò, C. (ES)
    García-Mijangos, I. (ES)
    Nowak, A. (PL)
    Storch, D. (CZ)
    Ulrich, W. (PL)
    Campos, J. A. (ES)
    Cancellieri, L. (IT)
    Carboni, M. (CA)
    Ciaschetti, G. (IT)
    De Frenne, P. (BE)
    Doležal, Jiří (BU-J) RID, ORCID
    Dolnik, C. (DE)
    Essl, F. (AT)
    Fantinato, E. (IT)
    Filibeck, G. (IT)
    Grytnes, J.-A. (NO)
    Guarino, R. (IT)
    Güler, B. (TR)
    Janišová, M. (SK)
    Klichowska, E. (PL)
    Kozub, Ł. (PL)
    Kuzemko, A. (UA)
    Manthey, M. (DE)
    Mimet, A. (DE)
    Naqinezhad, A. (IR)
    Pedersen, C. (NO)
    Peet, R. K. (US)
    Pellissier, V. (DE)
    Pielech, R. (PL)
    Potenza, G. (IT)
    Rosati, L. (IT)
    Terzi, M. (IT)
    Valkó, O. (HU)
    Vynokurov, D. (UA)
    White, H. (IE)
    Winkler, M. (AT)
    Biurrun, I. (ES)
    Zdroj.dok.Journal of Biogeography. - : Wiley - ISSN 0305-0270
    Roč. 47, č. 1 (2020), s. 72-86
    Poč.str.15 s.
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.GB - Velká Británie
    Klíč. slovaspecies richness across spatial scales ; grasslands ; global pattern
    Vědní obor RIVEA - Morfologické obory a cytologie
    Obor OECDBiology (theoretical, mathematical, thermal, cryobiology, biological rhythm), Evolutionary biology
    CEPGA17-19376S GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR
    Způsob publikováníOpen access
    Institucionální podporaBU-J - RVO:67985939
    UT WOS000509327100006
    EID SCOPUS85073966067
    DOI10.1111/jbi.13697
    AnotaceSpecies–area relationships (SARs) are fundamental scaling laws in ecology although their shape is still disputed. At larger areas, power laws best represent SARs. Yet, it remains unclear whether SARs follow other shapes at finer spatial grains in continuous vegetation. We asked which function describes SARs best at small grains and explored how sampling methodology or the environment influence SAR shape. Palaearctic grasslands and other non‐forested habitats. We used the GrassPlot database, containing standardized vegetation‐plot data from vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens spanning a wide range of grassland types throughout the Palaearctic and including 2,057 nested‐plot series with at least seven grain sizes ranging from 1 cm2 to 1,024 m2. Using nonlinear regression, we assessed the appropriateness of different SAR functions (power, power quadratic, power breakpoint, logarithmic, Michaelis–Menten). Based on AICc, we tested whether the ranking of functions differed among taxonomic groups, methodological settings, biomes or vegetation types. The power function was the most suitable function across the studied taxonomic groups. The superiority of this function increased from lichens to bryophytes to vascular plants to all three taxonomic groups together. The sampling method was highly influential as rooted presence sampling decreased the performance of the power function. By contrast, biome and vegetation type had practically no influence on the superiority of the power law. We conclude that SARs of sessile organisms at smaller spatial grains are best approximated by a power function.
    PracovištěBotanický ústav
    KontaktMartina Bartošová, martina.bartosova@ibot.cas.cz, ibot@ibot.cas.cz, Tel.: 271 015 242 ; Marie Jakšová, marie.jaksova@ibot.cas.cz, Tel.: 384 721 156-8
    Rok sběru2021
    Elektronická adresahttp://hdl.handle.net/11104/0312153
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.