Počet záznamů: 1  

A comparative study of three fishery methods for sampling the invasive topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) in ponds

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0583824
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevA comparative study of three fishery methods for sampling the invasive topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) in ponds
    Tvůrce(i) Kajgrová, L. (CZ)
    Drozd, B. (CZ)
    Regenda, J. (CZ)
    Draštík, Vladislav (BC-A) RID, ORCID
    Kočvara, Luboš (BC-A) RID, ORCID
    Kolařik, Tomáš (BC-A)
    Peterka, Jiří (BC-A) RID, ORCID
    Blabolil, Petr (BC-A) RID, ORCID
    Celkový počet autorů8
    Zdroj.dok.Journal of Fish Biology. - : Wiley - ISSN 0022-1112
    Roč. 102, č. 5 (2023), s. 1121-1128
    Poč.str.8 s.
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.US - Spojené státy americké
    Klíč. slovaelectrofishing ; fish-trapping ; population characteristic ; throw-netting
    Vědní obor RIVGL - Rybářství
    Obor OECDFishery
    CEPEF16_025/0007417 GA MŠMT - Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy
    Způsob publikováníOmezený přístup
    Institucionální podporaBC-A - RVO:60077344
    UT WOS000952872500001
    EID SCOPUS85150727711
    DOI10.1111/jfb.15361
    AnotaceInvasive fish threaten ponds' ecological status and their ecosystem services, therefore obtaining a representative sample of fish community composition is fundamental to fishery management, research and nature conservation. Estimates of the size distribution, density and biomass of the topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) model species of invasive fish in three ponds were compared among three sampling methods: electrofishing, fish-trapping and throw-netting. The study illustrates that the invasive fish, P. parva, can be detected by all tested fishing methods, yet our results clearly showed that there are pronounced differences among methods in population characteristic estimates. Electrofishing and throw-netting gave biased information on the size distribution of P. parva. Fish-trapping and throw-netting gave reasonable P. parva density and biomass estimates, while electrofishing clearly underestimated it. All tested methods showed a body size increment of P. parva between summer and autumn sampling sessions, yet neither throw-netting nor electrofishing recorded an increment in its density. Our study showed that fish-trapping is the most reliable and affordable method to estimate invasive P. parva population characteristics in ponds despite more time-demanding sampling. The success depends on the mesh size of sampling gear, operator skill and habitat structure. The cost-effectiveness of the selected methods and the importance of invasive fish monitoring in ponds is discussed. The sampling gear must be considered carefully according to the aim of the monitoring.
    PracovištěBiologické centrum (od r. 2006)
    KontaktDana Hypšová, eje@eje.cz, Tel.: 387 775 214
    Rok sběru2024
    Elektronická adresahttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15361
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.