Počet záznamů: 1
Psychometric Properties of Czech Versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization and Compensation Questionnaires
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0551097 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV J - Článek v odborném periodiku Poddruh J Článek ve WOS Název Psychometric Properties of Czech Versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization and Compensation Questionnaires Tvůrce(i) Millová, Katarína (PSU-E) RID, ORCID, SAI
Malatincová, T. (CZ)Zdroj.dok. Studia Psychologica. - : Slovenská akadémia vied - ISSN 0039-3320
Roč. 63, č. 4 (2021), s. 369-392Poč.str. 24 s. Forma vydání Tištěná - P Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. SK - Slovensko Klíč. slova selection ; optimization ; compensation ; SOC model ; intentional self-regulation Vědní obor RIV AN - Psychologie Obor OECD Psychology (including human - machine relations) CEP GA18-11996S GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR Způsob publikování Open access Institucionální podpora PSU-E - RVO:68081740 UT WOS 000733419400001 EID SCOPUS 85122580716 DOI 10.31577/sp.2021.04.834 Anotace The study deals with the psychometric characteristics of the Czech versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC) questionnaires. Self-report data were collected in a sample of 618 university students aged between 19 and 30 years. McDonald's omega coefficient was used for reliability estimation, construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Criterion validity was tested in a series of regression analyses. The instruments showed adequate reliability, ranging from 0.73 to 0.84 for Academic SOC and from 0.70 to 0.79 for Social SOC scales. Confirmatory factor analysis did not corroborate the original model proposed by Geldhof et al. (2012), except for the Loss-Based Selection factor. Post-hoc exploratory principal component analysis further supported these results. It turned out that the items were clustered according to different criteria compared to the original dimensions. Our results are in line with more recent findings, pointing to differences in the structure and employment of SOC strategies in young and older adults. We recommend that the Academic and Social SOC are revised in accordance with these recent findings and other methodological considerations. Pracoviště Psychologický ústav Kontakt Štěpánka Halamová, Halamova@praha.psu.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 222 096 Rok sběru 2022 Elektronická adresa https://journals.savba.sk/index.php/studiapsychologica/article/view/368/91
Počet záznamů: 1