Are non-accidental regularities a cosmic coincidence? Revisiting a central threat to Humean laws

0545130 - FLÚ 2022 RIV NL eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Filomeno, Aldo
Are non-accidental regularities a cosmic coincidence? Revisiting a central threat to Humean laws.
Synthese. Roč. 198, č. 6 (2021), s. 5205-5227. ISSN 0039-7857. E-ISSN 1573-0964
Grant ostatní: AV ČR(CZ) AP1602
Program: Akademická prémie - Praemium Academiae
Institucionální podpora: RVO:67985955
Klíčová slova: Humean account of laws * Best system account of laws * Ignorance * Principle of indifference * Suspension of judgment * Coincidences
Obor OECD: Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Impakt faktor: 1.595, rok: 2021
Způsob publikování: Omezený přístup
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02397-1

If the laws of nature are as the Humean believes, it is an unexplained cosmic coincidence that the actual Humean mosaic is as extremely regular as it is. This is a strong and well-known objection to the Humean account of laws. Yet, as reasonable as this objection may seem, it is nowadays sometimes dismissed. The reason: its unjustified implicit assignment of equiprobability to each possible Humean mosaic, that is, its assumption of the principle of indifference, which has been attacked on many grounds ever since it was first proposed. In place of equiprobability, recent formal models represent the doxastic state of total ignorance as suspension of judgment. In this paper I revisit the cosmic coincidence objection to Humean laws by assessing which doxastic state we should endorse. By focusing on specific features of our scenario I conclude that suspending judgment results in an unnecessarily weak doxastic state. First, I point out that recent literature in epistemology has provided independent justifications of the principle of indifference. Second, given that the argument is framed within a Humean metaphysics, it turns out that we are warranted to appeal to these justifications and assign a uniform and additive credence distribution among Humean mosaics. This leads us to conclude that, contrary to widespread opinion, we should not dismiss the cosmic coincidence objection to the Humean account of laws.
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0321884