More Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries\n

0523658 - ÚSP 2020 RIV NL eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Simon, Rita
More Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries
.
European Review of Private Law. Roč. 27, č. 6 (2020), s. 1389-1410. ISSN 0928-9801
Grant ostatní: International Visegrad Fund(CZ) 21730099
Institucionální podpora: RVO:68378122
Klíčová slova: New Deal for Consumers * representative actions * collective redress mechanisms * Visegrad 4 countries * more flexible enhanced administrative measures
Obor OECD: Law
Způsob publikování: Pouze metadata

Classic injunction actions before a court are very rarely used instruments in the Visegrad 4 countries, they are too expensive, too long proceedings, with uncertain results. On one hand, a lost court case can cause insolvency for the organization and on other hand a won case cannot ensure a direct compensation of the harmed consumer. Therefore, the Visegrad 4 consumer protection organizations tend to move to other redresses. After a short introduction to existing injunction actions and their shortcuts in the Visegrad 4 counties (1), the article explains why the way of amending representative actions, as recommended by the new Commission Proposal cannot provide more efficient or effective justice in the Visegrad 4 countries (2), and based on the best practices of the Visegrad 4 countries I will propose alternative instruments, such as public enforcement and more flexible enhanced consumer measures by administrative authorities, which have proved quite efficient in resolving mass harm situations (3).
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0307975