Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) reference based on low-variance signals

0559962 - ÚPT 2023 RIV US eng C - Konferenční příspěvek (zahraniční konf.)
Uher, Daniel - Klimeš, Petr - Cimbálník, J. - Roman, R. - Pail, M. - Brázdil, M. - Jurák, Pavel
Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) reference based on low-variance signals.
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference Proceedings. In: 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). New York: IEEE, 2020, (2020), s. 204-207. ISBN 978-1-7281-1990-8. ISSN 1557-170X.
[Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) /42./. Montreal (CA), 20.07.2020-24.07.2020]
Grant CEP: GA MŠMT(CZ) LTAUSA18056
Institucionální podpora: RVO:68081731
Klíčová slova: brain * electroencephalography * independent component analysis * medical image processing * medical signal processing
Obor OECD: Medical engineering
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9175734/

For a correct assessment of stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) recordings, a proper signal electrical reference is necessary. Such a reference might be physical or virtual. Physical reference can be noisy and a proper virtual reference calculation is often time-consuming. This paper uses the variance of the SEEG signals to calculate the reference from relatively low noise signals to reduce the contamination by distant sources, while maintaining negligible computing time.Ten patients with SEEG recordings were used in this study. 20-second long recordings from each patient, sampled at 5000 Hz, were used to calculate variances of SEEG signals and a low-variance (LV) subset of signals was selected for each patient. Consequently, 4 different reference signals were calculated using: 1) an average signal from WM contacts only (AVG_WM), 2) an average signal from LV contacts only (AVG_LV), 3) independent component analysis (ICA) method from WM contacts only (ICA_WM), and 4) ICA method from LV signals only (ICA_LV). Also, the original testing reference, an average signal from all SEEG contacts (AVG) was utilized. Finally, bipolar signals and average signals from anatomical structures were calculated and used to evaluate reference signals.91.7% of the WM SEEG contacts were found below the average variance. ICA_LV showed the best and AVG_WM the worst overall results. AVG_LV had the most positive impact on minimizing the mutual correlations between separate brain structures and correcting the outliers. The average processing time for ICA methods was 66.72 seconds and 0.7870 seconds for AVG methods (100 000 samples, 125.7±20.4 SEEG signals).Utilizing the LV data subset improves the reference signal. WM references are difficult to obtain and seem to be more susceptible to errors caused by low number of WM contacts in the dataset. ICA_LV can be considered as one of the best reference estimations, however the calculation is very demanding and time consuming. AVG_LV shows good and stable results, while it is based on a straightforward methodology and outstandingly fast calculation.
Trvalý link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0333251