How reliable are current crop models for simulating growth and seed yield of canola across global sites and under future climate change?

0558441 - ÚVGZ 2023 RIV NL eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Wang, E. - He, D. - Wang, J. - Lilley, J. - Christy, B. - Hoffmann, M. - O'Leary, G. - Hatfield, J. - Ledda, L. - Deligios, P. - Grant, B. - Jing, Q. - Nendel, Claas - Kage, H. - Qian, B. - Rezaei, E. - Smith, W. - Weymann, W. - Ewert, F.
How reliable are current crop models for simulating growth and seed yield of canola across global sites and under future climate change?
Climatic Change. Roč. 172, č. 1-2 (2022), č. článku 20. ISSN 0165-0009. E-ISSN 1573-1480
Institucionální podpora: RVO:86652079
Klíčová slova: air co2 enrichment * brassica-napus * uncertainty * temperature * phenology * rapeseed * productivity * performance * ensembles * impacts * AgMIP * Brassica napus L. * Model calibration * Model improvement * Multimodel ensemble * Sensitivity analysis
Obor OECD: Meteorology and atmospheric sciences
Impakt faktor: 4.8, rok: 2022
Způsob publikování: Open access
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-022-03375-2

To better understand how climate change might influence global canola production, scientists from six countries have completed the first inter-comparison of eight crop models for simulating growth and seed yield of canola, based on experimental data from six sites across five countries. A sensitivity analysis was conducted with a combination of five levels of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, seven temperature changes, five precipitation changes, together with five nitrogen application rates. Our results were in several aspects different from those of previous model inter-comparison studies for wheat, maize, rice, and potato crops. A partial model calibration only on phenology led to very poor simulation of aboveground biomass and seed yield of canola, even from the ensemble median or mean. A full calibration with additional data of leaf area index, biomass, and yield from one treatment at each site reduced simulation error of seed yield from 43.8 to 18.0%, but the uncertainty in simulation results remained large. Such calibration (with data from one treatment) was not able to constrain model parameters to reduce simulation uncertainty across the wide range of environments. Using a multi-model ensemble mean or median reduced the uncertainty of yield simulations, but the simulation error remained much larger than observation errors, indicating no guarantee that the ensemble mean/median would predict the correct responses. Using multi-model ensemble median, canola yield was projected to decline with rising temperature (2.5-5.7% per degrees C), but to increase with increasing CO2 concentration (4.6-8.3% per 100-ppm), rainfall (2.1-6.1% per 10% increase), and nitrogen rates (1.3-6.0% per 10% increase) depending on locations. Due to the large uncertainty, these results need to be treated with caution. We further discuss the need to collect new data to improve modelling of several key physiological processes of canola for increased confidence in future climate impact assessments.
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0332107