Potential morbidity reduction for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using respiratory gating

0549521 - ÚJF 2022 RIV CH eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Kraus, K. M. - Simonetto, C. - Kundrát, Pavel - Waitz, V. - Borm, K. J. - Combs, S. E.
Potential morbidity reduction for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using respiratory gating.
Cancers (Basel). Roč. 13, č. 20 (2021), č. článku 5092. E-ISSN 2072-6694
Institucionální podpora: RVO:61389005
Klíčová slova: lung cancer * motion management * radiation toxicity * radiotherapy treatment planning * SBRT
Obor OECD: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Impakt faktor: 6.575, rok: 2021
Způsob publikování: Open access
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205092

We investigated the potential of respiratory gating to mitigate the motion-caused misdos-age in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). For fourteen patients with lung tumors, we investigated treatment plans for a gating window (GW) including three breathing phases around the maximum exhalation phase, GW40-60. For a subset of six patients, we also assessed a preceding three-phase GW20-40 and six-phase GW20-70. We analyzed the target volume, lung, esophagus, and heart doses. Using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, we estimated radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis risks. Compared to plans without gating, GW40-60 significantly reduced doses to organs at risk without impairing the tumor doses. On average, the mean lung dose decreased by 0.6 Gy (p < 0.001), treated lung V20Gy by 2.4% (p = 0.003), esophageal dose to 5cc by 2.0 Gy (p = 0.003), and maximum heart dose by 3.2 Gy (p = 0.009). The model-estimated mean risks of 11% for pneumonitis and 12% for esophagitis without gating decreased upon GW40-60 to 7% and 9%, respectively. For the highest-risk patient, gating reduced the pneumonitis risk from 43% to 32%. Gating is most beneficial for patients with high-toxicity risks. Pre-treatment toxicity risk assessment may help optimize patient selection for gating, as well as GW selection for individual patients.
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0325516