Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

0539085 - ÚGN 2021 RIV CH eng J - Článek v odborném periodiku
Andráško, Ivan
Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research.
Water. Roč. 13, č. 2 (2021), č. článku 140. E-ISSN 2073-4441
Grant CEP: GA ČR(CZ) GA20-11782S
Institucionální podpora: RVO:68145535
Klíčová slova: floods * flood risk management * mitigation measures * behavior * risk perception * experience * flood risk research
Obor OECD: Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Impakt faktor: 3.530, rok: 2021
Způsob publikování: Open access
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htm

Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process, six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general, and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda.
Trvalý link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0316838