Počet záznamů: 1
Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0508404 Druh ASEP J - Článek v odborném periodiku Zařazení RIV J - Článek v odborném periodiku Poddruh J Článek ve WOS Název Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy Tvůrce(i) Hanke, Miroslav (FLU-F) RID, ORCID, SAI Zdroj.dok. History and Philosophy of Logic. - : Taylor & Francis - ISSN 0144-5340
Roč. 40, č. 4 (2019), s. 355-373Poč.str. 19 s. Forma vydání Tištěná - P Jazyk dok. eng - angličtina Země vyd. GB - Velká Británie Klíč. slova probabilistic logic ; logical validity ; epistemic logic ; Jesuits ; second scholasticism Vědní obor RIV AA - Filosofie a náboženství Obor OECD Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology CEP GA17-12408S GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR Způsob publikování Omezený přístup Institucionální podpora FLU-F - RVO:67985955 UT WOS 000472974300001 EID SCOPUS 85066985999 DOI 10.1080/01445340.2019.1615363 Anotace There is a well-documented paradigm-shift in eighteenth century Jesuit philosophy and science, at the very least in Central Europe: traditional scholastic version(s) of Aristotelianism were replaced by early modern rationalism (Wolff’s systematisation of Leibnizian philosophy) and early modern science and mathematics. In the field of probability, this meant that the traditional Jesuit engagement with probability, uncertainty, and truthlikeness (in particular, as applied to moral theology) could translate into mathematical language, and can be analysed against the background of the accounts of probability, pre-mathematical Jesuit logic, Wolff’s conceptual analysis, and Bernoullian mathematisation. The works of two Jesuit philosophers, Berthold Hauser and Sigismund Storchenau, can be related to this context. The core of their logic of (epistemic) probability is the account of negation (or ‘contradiction’) and implication (or ‘argument’), in particular, the algorithms for computing the reliability of one piece of evidence when compared to the respective counter-evidence and for computing the probability of a conclusion given the probability of its premises. Pracoviště Filosofický ústav Kontakt Chlumská Simona, chlumska@flu.cas.cz ; Tichá Zuzana, asep@flu.cas.cz Tel: 221 183 360 Rok sběru 2020 Elektronická adresa https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01445340.2019.1615363
Počet záznamů: 1