Next Article in Journal
The Combination of a Biocontrol Agent Trichoderma asperellum SC012 and Hymexazol Reduces the Effective Fungicide Dose to Control Fusarium Wilt in Cowpea
Next Article in Special Issue
Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Dermatophytes: Comparison between an In-House Method and a Commercial Kit for the Diagnosis of Dermatophytoses in Patients from Dakar, Senegal
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction, Structural Characterisation, and Immunomodulatory Properties of Edible Amanita hemibapha subspecies javanica (Corner and Bas) Mucilage Polysaccharide as a Potential of Functional Food
Previous Article in Special Issue
State-of-the-Art Dermatophyte Infections: Epidemiology Aspects, Pathophysiology, and Resistance Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Outbreak of Trichophyton quinckeanum Zoonotic Infections in the Czech Republic Transmitted from Cats and Dogs

by
Pavlína Lysková
1,†,
Radim Dobiáš
2,3,†,
Adéla Čmoková
4,5,
Miroslav Kolařík
4,5,
Petr Hamal
6,*,
Kateřina Šmatláková
7,
Jan Hušek
8,
Karel Mencl
9,
Nad’a Mallátová
10,
Zora Poláčková
11,
Anežka Krnáčová
12,
Kristýna Palkovičová
13,
Daniela Jablonská
14,
Jitka Macháčová
15,
Zdeněk Drlík
11,16,
Denisa Bázsóová
2,
Pavla Jaworská
2,
Lucie Svobodová
6 and
Vit Hubka
4,5,*
1
Department of Parasitology, Mycology and Mycobacteriology, Public Health Institute in Ústí nad Labem, 186 00 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Bacteriology and Mycology, Public Health Institute Ostrava, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
4
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic
5
Laboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
6
Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Olomouc, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic
7
Veterinární Klinika MVDr. Vlastimil Pospíšil, 68 201 Vyškov, Czech Republic
8
Veterinární Klinika Veterix, 79 601 Prostějov, Czech Republic
9
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Pardubice Regional Hospital, 53 203 Pardubice, Czech Republic
10
Laboratory of Mycology and Parasitology, Hospital České Budějovice, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
11
Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, University Hospital Olomouc, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic
12
Department of Dermatology, Přerov Hospital, 751 52 Přerov, Czech Republic
13
Dermatology Center DERMI s.r.o., 639 00 Brno, Czech Republic
14
Dermatology Center, Hranice Hospital, 753 22 Hranice, Czech Republic
15
Dermatology Center, 757 01 Valašské Meziříčí, Czech Republic
16
Dr. Drlik Dermatovenereology, 789 85 Mohelnice, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
P.L. and R.D. contributed equally to this article.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(9), 684; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090684
Submission received: 30 June 2021 / Revised: 7 August 2021 / Accepted: 19 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Dermatophytes)

Abstract

:
Trichophyton quinckeanum, a zoophilic dermatophyte mostly known as the causative agent of rodent favus, is relatively rarely reported to cause human infections. Indeed, no infections were detected in Czechia between 2012 and 2015 despite routine verification of species identification by ITS rDNA sequencing. By contrast, 25 human and 11 animal cases of infection were documented from December 2016 to December 2020 and the rates tended to grow every following year. Interestingly, most of the cases were reported in the Olomouc region, suggesting a local outbreak. We bring the evidence that human T. quinckeanum infections are most commonly contracted from infected cats or, less frequently, dogs. Although rodents or contaminated soil and environment could be the source of infection to cats and dogs, the occurrence of infections in multiple animals in the same household suggests direct transmission among animals. Confirmation of the identification by molecular methods is highly recommended due to morphological similarity with T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates to eight antifungals was performed using EUCAST methodology (E.Def 11.0). Among the tested antifungals, terbinafine, amorolfine, ciclopirox and efinaconazole were most potent in vitro and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations were obtained for fluconazole and ketoconazole.

1. Introduction

The zoophilic species Trichophyton quinckeanum was earlier known as a variety of T. mentagrophytes, that is, T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum [1,2]. In the past, the taxonomic status of this pathogen was the subject of many controversies which have been reviewed in detail by Beguin et al. [3]. Based on the recently published taxonomy, which is predominantly based on molecular biology criteria, T. quinckeanum again constitutes a distinct species closely related to anthropophilic T. schoenleinii [4]. Rodents and camels are considered the main natural reservoirs of T. quinckeanum which preferably occurs in the Middle East [5]. In Europe, this pathogen has been only sporadically isolated from humans, and there have been no or only sporadic reports of T. quinckeanum in Czechia [1,6,7].
Thanks to a large epidemiological study on dermatophytosis ongoing in Czechia since 2011, exact prospective data substantiated by molecularly identified isolates are available [7,8]. This has led to the detection of an increasing number of cases of infections in recent years which are summarized in this study. In addition to an analysis of epidemiological data, we searched for possible sources of infections and characterized antifungal susceptibility patterns, morphology and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) in obtained isolates to offer appropriate treatment options and diagnostic tools.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dermatophyte Isolates, Specimen Collection and Examination

Dermatophytes from human tinea infections were collected prospectively from eight clinical laboratories across Czechia since 2012 as described previously [7,8]. During this period, more than 15,000 dermatophytosis cases were recorded, representing all clinical types of tinea, with approximately 1500–1700 cases registered per year. Identification of all dermatophytes except T. rubrum was confirmed by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA sequencing (see below). A total of 36 isolates of T. quinckeanum were examined in this study. The information on the isolation source of all isolates is provided in Table 1 and Table 2.
Skin lesions were scraped from the edge or entirely (small lesions) using scalpel blades or dermal curette; hairs were plucked and crusts picked from scalp lesions. The collected material was divided for cultivation (Sabouraud’s dextrose agar with cycloheximide and chloramphenicol, and Sabouraud’s dextrose agar without antibiotics, 25 °C) and direct microscopic examination. Skin squames and hairs were mounted between the glass slide and coverslip in a drop of 20% KOH with Parker ink or Blankophor (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) [9], depending on the laboratory. Microscopic examination was performed under a light or fluorescence microscope.

2.2. Culture, Morphology, Physiology and Preservation

The isolates of T. quinckeanum were grown on a set of agar media, including malt extract agar (MEA; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA; HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and potato dextrose agar (PDA; HiMedia) at 25 and 37 °C. Colony color determinations were performed using the ISCC-NBS centroid color charts [10]. Micromorphology was documented as described previously [11].
Physiological tests on T1–T7 agar media were performed according to the procedure described previously [12,13], with commercial (HiMedia) as well as laboratory-made media being tested. The tests included T1 (vitamin-free casamino acid agar); basal medium for agars T2–T5, T2 (T1 enriched with inositol), T3 (T2 enriched with thiamine), T4 (T1 enriched with thiamine) and T5 (T1 enriched with nicotinic acid); physiological test T6 based on vitamin-free ammonium nitrate agar; basal medium for agar T7 (T6 enriched with L-histidine). SGA, MEA and T1–T7 growth at 26 ± 1 °C were assessed after 7 and 14 days of culture.
The isolates were deposited into the Culture Collection of Fungi (CCF), Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague, under accession numbers listed in Table 1 and Table 2.

2.3. Molecular Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from seven-day-old colonies using Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep Kit (Zymo research, Irvine, CA, USA). The quality of the extracted DNA was evaluated with NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer. The ITS rDNA region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 cluster) was amplified using the forward primer ITS1F and reverse primers ITS4 or NL4 [14,15]. Reaction volume of 20 µL contained 1 µL (50 ng mL−1) of DNA, 0.3 µL of both primers (25 pM mL−1), 0.2 µL of My Taq Polymerase and 4 μL of 5 × My Taq PCR buffer (Bioline, London, UK). PCR conditions followed the protocol described by Hubka et al. [16]. PCR product purification followed the previously described protocol [17]. Automated sequencing was performed at Macrogen Sequencing Service (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) using both terminal primers.

2.4. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Thirty-six isolates of T. quinckeanum were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS and compared with spectra of other common zoophilic Trichophyton species occurring in Czechia, namely the T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale complex (n = 20), T. benhamiae var. luteum (n = 20) and T. erinacei (n = 20). Culture and protein mass extraction for MALDI analysis was carried out based on recommendations of the manufacturer. Following complete washing and drying of sample pellets, each sample was coated with 1 µL of the matrix (HCCA portioned; Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany), and again dried at room temperature. MALDI-TOF MS measurements were performed with the Microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, manufacturer). The MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software was used to analyze spectra. FlexAnalysis ver. 3.4 (Bruker Daltonics GmbH) was used for comparison of T. quinckeanum mass spectra with other closely related zoophilic dermatophytes. The data generated in the present study were compared with previously published reference spectra from Germany [5].

2.5. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Fluconazole in a powder form was obtained from Pfizer Pharmaceutical Group (New York, NY, USA); terbinafine, itraconazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, efinaconazole, amorolfine and ciclopirox were obtained from Merck (Prague, Czech Republic).
Broth microdilution was performed according to the EUCAST document E.Def 11.0 for dermatophyte testing [18]. Briefly, the isolates were incubated at 25 °C on SDA (Trios, Prague, Czech Republic). Inoculum suspensions were created from one- to two-week-old colonies (to achieve acceptable sporulation). The suspension was prepared in sterile distilled water supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 and filtered using sterile nylon filters with 11 μm pore size (Merck). The suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 2–5 × 106 conidia per mL by counting the conidia in a hemocytometer chamber. The suspension was then diluted 1:10 with sterile distilled water to obtain the final working inoculum 2–5 × 105 colony-forming units per mL. The inoculum suspension was supplemented with chloramphenicol (Merck; final concentration 50 mg/L) and cycloheximide (Merck; final concentration 300 mg/L). Microplates were incubated at 25 °C in ambient air for 5 days. The endpoints, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), were read visually (the drug concentration yielding no visible growth by eye was scored as the MIC value) and spectrophotometrically (50% inhibition) [18]. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control strains.
MIC ranges, corresponding geometric mean (GM) values, MIC50 (MIC causing inhibition of 50% of the isolates) and MIC90 (MIC causing inhibition of 90% of the isolates) were determined for the antifungal drug and reading method used. For GM calculation, MIC values of ≤0.004 mg/L were set at 0.004 mg/L and MIC values of ≤0.008 mg/L were set at 0.008 mg/L; similarly, MIC values of >64 mg/L were set at 128 mg/L.

3. Results

3.1. Epidemiological Summary

A total of 36 T. quinckeanum strains were isolated from Czech human patients (n = 25) and animals (n = 11; 7 cats and 4 dogs). Microscopic hyphae presented in skin lesion samples are illustrated in Figure 1. All isolates are listed in Table 1 and Table 2. No human cases were detected in Czechia between 2012 and 2015 despite routine identification of dermatophytes by DNA sequencing. The first T. quinckeanum strain was isolated in late 2016 and since then, its incidence in Czechia has been noticeably growing (Figure 2). Two human cases were recorded in 2017, four in 2018, eight in 2019, and ten in 2020. Twenty-five strains were isolated in humans and eleven from animals. Almost all cases were detected in the Olomouc region (Figure 2) and predominantly in spring and winter months (Table 1 and Table 2).
Trichophyton quinckeanum was more frequently isolated in females (72%). The median age of patients was 23 years (range, 4–77 years); adults predominated (56%) over children and adolescents (≤18 years of age). The infections were mainly manifested as tinea corporis and tinea cruris (n = 18; 69.2%), less commonly as tinea capitis (n = 4) and tinea faciei (n = 4). The patients most commonly reported contacts with cats and dogs in their history (Table 1).

3.2. Physiology and Morphology

The strains were unable to grow on T6 basal medium, dissimilar to selected zoophilic species belonging to the T. benhamiae complex (T. benhamiae var. luteum, T. europeum, T. erinacei, T. bullosum and T. verrucosum) [19] and the T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale complex. The addition of L-histidine to the T6 medium (T7 medium) resulted in a rapid growth of the cultures. Slow-growing zoophilic species, T. bullosum and T. verrucosum, significantly differed from T. quinckeanum in T1, T5 and T7 tests, which were negative. A urease test was positive for all the tested species excluding T. verrucosum and T. bullosum. Results of physiological tests are summarized in Table 3.
Macromorphology of T. quinckeanum is shown in Figure 3. The growth rates of isolates were comparable to those of T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale and T. benhamiae var. benhamiae [19]. The colony diameter ranged from 35 to 47 mm (mean, 39 mm) on SDA, from 28 to 30 mm (mean, 30 mm) on PDA and from 35 to 44 mm (mean, 39 mm) on MEA after 7 days at 25 °C, and from 32 to 35 mm (mean, 33 mm) on SDA after 7 days at 37 °C. Colonies on all media were rapidly spreading, flat with slightly raised, umbonate or cerebriform centers. The colony edges were star-shaped to dendritic on SDA and entire to filiform on MEA and PDA. The colony texture was finely granular to velvety on all media, part of the strains showed a cottony texture, submerged growth, or a mixed pattern with sector growth. The colony color was white (#F2F3F4), yellowish white (#F0EAD6) to dark grayish purple (#50404D); the colony reverse was a vivid orange–yellow (#F6A600), dark purplish red (#673147) to strong yellowish brown (#996515) on SDA, and a pale yellow (#F3E5AB) with strong yellowish brown (#996515) centers on MEA and PDA.
The microconidia were predominantly pyriform to clavate, sized 2.5–5.5 (mean ± SD, 4.1 ± 0.6) × 2–3.5 (2.5 ± 0.2) μm, and borne sessile on conidiophores poorly differentiated from vegetative hyphae or conidiophores branched in a pyramidal fashion with central branches tapering toward the tips. The macroconidia were abundantly produced after 2 weeks of cultivation on MEA in all strains examined micromorphologically (n = 10). They were thin-walled, formed at the end of hyphae or poorly differentiated conidiophores, rarely intercalary, cigar-shaped or clavate, 39–57 (48.7 ± 7.4) × 4.5–8 (6.4 ± 0.9) μm, usually consisting of 4–8 cells (2–9 cells; median, 6). Spiral hyphae were present, more abundant in several-week-old cultures.

3.3. DNA Sequence-Based Identification

The DNA sequences of the ITS rDNA region were identical in all examined strains of T. quinckeanum from human patients as well as from animals. The resulting sequences were deposited into the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) under accession numbers MZ312189–MZ312224.
The sequences were 100% identical to strains associated with recent outbreak of infections in Germany (GenBank accession numbers KY680503, KU257460–KU257462, KU257469) and displayed two and one substitutions in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions, respectively, in comparison with the ex-neotype strain IHEM 13697 (GenBank: MK298745), resulting in a 99.5% similarity. The differentiation of the most closely related species, anthropophilic T. schoenleinii, could not be achieved by using ITS region sequencing. Despite the fact that all T. quinckeanum isolates showed two substitutions in the ITS1 region compared to the majority of T. schoenleinii strains deposited in the GenBank, these substitutions were not conserved for T. quinckeanum as a whole. On the other hand, the misidentification of the two species in the clinical laboratory is highly improbable due to their strikingly different morphology and ecology. The differentiation of other dermatophytes by ITS rDNA was possible thanks to many unique substitutions.

3.4. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

In the mass range of approximately 4050–4200 m/z, T. quinckeanum could be reliably distinguished from T. benhamiae var. luteum and the T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale complex in the specific peaks at 4110 m/z and 4160 m/z, respectively (Figure 4A). In the mass range of approximately 7550–8250 m/z, the MALDI-TOF MS spectra of T. quinckeanum were very similar to the above species and their differentiation was not possible (Figure 4B,C).
The differences between T. erinacei and T. quinckeanum could be found especially in the mass ranges of approximately 7650–7800 m/z and 8050–8200 m/z in two specific peaks at 7730 m/z and 8130–8140 m/z (Figure 4B,C). Specific peaks in the range of 4110–4160 m/z could be used in the routine identification of T. quinckeanum in practice using the FlexAnalysis tool after the automatic analysis with a MALDI Biotyper.

3.5. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Results of the susceptibility testing of 36 T. quinckeanum strains are given in Table 4. The obtained MICs for fluconazole were elevated in all the tested isolates. MICs for other antifungals tested were low, depending on the reading method used, with generally higher values achieved using visual reading compared to spectrophotometric reading. MICs for amorolfine, ciclopirox and efinaconazole were low. MICs for ketoconazole were elevated. MICs for terbinafine were very low with both testing methods for all isolates, with MIC ≤ 0.016 mg/L.

4. Discussion

In Europe, T. quinckeanum has been only sporadically isolated from humans. It seemed logical that the pathogen was in decline with an improving standard of life in developed countries as, historically, infections were mostly connected with low social and economic levels and poor hygiene [7,22,23]. For many years, there were no or only rare reports of T. quinckeanum in Czechia [1,7,24,25]. The first isolate verified by molecular methods was detected at the end of 2016 and the incidence of cases has been considerably growing since then (Table 1, Figure 2). A similar increase in the incidence of this pathogen was recorded several years earlier in Germany [5].
The species is historically connected with mouse favus or rodent favus in general [1,26], but the occasional hosts are also cats, dogs, rabbits, camels, chickens, horses and sheep [5]. Uhrlaß et al. [5] suspected cats as the main source of human zoonotic infections, which is in agreement with our data. In addition, we showed that dogs can also be the source of infection. It is usually assumed that the infection in domestic animals occurs due to transmission from rodents (mice) and then is eventually transmitted to humans. In this study, we showed that the infection may probably spread among domestic animals independently on rodents as indicated by the occurrence of infection in several animals in the same household (Table 2). This information is valuable because dermatophytes usually spread effectively only in their main host(s) and further transmission among other occasionally infected hosts is rare.
The occurrence of this pathogen in Czechia is a new phenomenon in terms of recent decades and is in contrast to the absence of this species in previous years (2012–2015) during which we confirmed the identification of dermatophytes coming from identical laboratories using ITS rDNA sequencing. Thanks to that, we can confidently exclude the possibility that this pathogen was missed or misidentified due to its morphological similarity to T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale or other superficially similar species [21,27]. The emergence of T. quinckeanum in animals in recent years is also in concordance with the incidence of human cases (Figure 2).
Although we have no clear explanation for the sudden rise of T. quinckeanum infections substantiated by data, there are several possible hypotheses. The increase can be caused by an overpopulation of rodents in Czechia observed in previous years, potentially leading to an increased transmission to domestic animals and eventually humans [28,29]. This hypothesis, however, does not explain the geographic clustering of the majority of cases into the Olomouc region around Prostějov and Olomouc cities. All but four isolates came from this area, indicating a local outbreak. In addition, a study on the occurrence of dermatophytes in rodents was carried out in the Czech Republic in recent years, which did not detect the presence of this pathogen [30]. In contrast to previous sporadic infections due to T. quinckeanum, the spread of infections among domestic animals is probably the main driving force of the current outbreak similar to the German one [5]. The spread among domestic animals is a completely new phenomenon that has not been described and may be caused by a shift in the virulence and other biological properties of the pathogen.
Interestingly, the Czech and German strains show identical ITS rDNA sequences which were different from all other T. quinckeanum isolates in the GenBank database. This suggests that the current outbreaks were caused by genetically different strains with possible new features compared to T. quinckeanum strains occurring in the past. We hypothesize that these strains could be more virulent, easily transmissible from pets to humans, and able to cause a small epidemic. However, more detailed comparative studies mapping differences in the physiology, virulence and host preferences of current and historical strains are needed for conclusions to be drawn. In the last decade, several new or emerging pathogenic dermatophytes have been reported. Namely, T. benhamiae var. benhamiae is an emerging pathogen in Europe mostly transmitted to humans from guinea pig [19,31,32]. Trichophyton erinacei, a pathogen of hedgehogs, is increasingly reported from human infections worldwide due to the growing interest of people in pet hedgehogs [33,34,35]. Another member of the T. benhamiae complex, T. persicum, was discovered as one of the major causes of zoonotic infections in Iran [36]. Finally, the name T. indotineae (=T. mentagrophytes genotype VIII) was introduced for a presumed clonal offshoot of T. mentagrophytes which causes epidemic or tinea infections in India and some other countries [37]. In this respect, T. quinckeanum can be considered an emerging pathogen in Germany and the Czech Republic.
Uhrlaß et al. [5] recorded that the majority of patients were older than 50 years (40%). In contrast to the German study, the Czech patients were mostly in the age groups 19 to 49 years (48%) and 1 to 18 years (44%), with only two patients being older than 50 years. In agreement with Uhrlaß et al. [5], we observed higher infection rates in females. This can probably be explained by the fact that women more often cuddle their pets [5].
A recent study showed differences in specific parts of the mass spectrum between strains of T. quinckeanum and other common zoophilic dermatophytes such as the T. mentagrophytes and T. benhamiae [5], but it is not entirely certain that the MALDI Biotyper automatic identification mode is possible for T. quinckeanum. However, the specific peak in the 4050–4200 m/z spectrum for T. quinckeanum supports the possibility of routine differentiation from other zoophilic species in practice using the FlexAnalysis tool in combination with micro- and macromorphological features. Further comparisons are certainly required, mainly due to the intra-species variability of the T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale complex and similarities of mass spectra in other dermatophyte species, especially the closely related T. schoenleinii. As showed by Packeu et al. [38], one out of six strains of T. quinckeanum was incorrectly identified as T. schoenleinii using MALDI-TOF MS.
The standardized methodology E.Def 11.0 was recently updated by the EUCAST-AFST and reading of the 50% inhibition endpoint has been recommended [18]. Based on this approach, obtained results will be comparable in future studies, enabling the definition of the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and breakpoints for the categorization of results. These days, ECOFF wild-type upper limits (WT-ULs) have been set for T. rubrum and T. interdigitale tested by the EUCAST E.Def 11.0 methodology for four antifungals (terbinafine, voriconazole, itraconazole and amorolfine). The proposed WT-ULs for terbinafine, itraconazole and amorolfine are 0.03, 0.25 and 0.125 for T. rubrum and 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 for T. interdigitale, respectively [18]. Values obtained in all T. quinckeanum isolates were lower in comparison with both proposed cut-offs [18]. Articles on T. quinckeanum antifungal susceptibility testing are scarce. Niewerth et al. [39] tested one strain of T. quinckeanum for itraconazole (1 mg/L), terbinafine (0.001 mg/L) and ciclopirox (3 mg/L) and obtained comparable results to ours by using the broth microdilution test (results were read by eye as no visible growth).
According to the literature, T. quinckeanum infections were usually treated with various systemic and local antifungals, mainly their combinations. Griseofulvin, terbinafine, econazole, clotrimazole, bifonazole, ciclopirox and ketoconazole were successfully used in the therapy [5,6,22,25,40]. One case of bifonazole cream treatment failure has been described [25]. The affected animals in our study were successfully treated with Pythium oligandrum whole-body baths three times a week for 14 days, usually in combination with a disinfectant (Alfadin). This approach seems to be considerate to animals, well-tolerated and does not support the development of resistance. The activity of P. oligandrum against dermatophytes has been demonstrated in vitro and in a small sample of patients in vivo [41,42]. Although no large-scale clinical trials have been conducted, our study provides more evidence about the effectiveness of this treatment.

5. Conclusions

We described a second local outbreak of T. quinckeanum infections in addition to the recent outbreak in Germany. We also brought evidence that rising human infections were mostly mediated by infected cats and dogs among which the infection spread at least partly independent of rodents. The spread of these infections underscores the need for a closer collaboration between veterinarians, dermatologists, epidemiologists and public health personnel to set up appropriate preventive measures. The confirmation of species identification by molecular methods is desired because the pathogen morphologically resembles T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale, a species with a similar host spectrum. MALDI-TOF MS can help in distinguishing T. quinckeanum from other common zoophilic dermatophytes, especially in the MS range of 4110–4160 m/z. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that T. quinckeanum had low MICs for most antifungals tested, especially terbinafine. Elevated MIC values were recorded for fluconazole and ketoconazole.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and R.D.; Data curation, P.J., M.K., K.Š., J.H., K.M., N.M., Z.P., A.K., K.P., D.J., J.M., Z.D. and L.S.; Formal analysis, P.L., R.D., P.J., P.H., D.B. and V.H.; Funding acquisition, M.K. and V.H.; Investigation, P.L., R.D., A.Č., M.K., J.H., K.M., N.M., Z.P., A.K., K.P., D.J., J.M., Z.D., D.B. and L.S.; Methodology, P.L., R.D. and V.H.; Project administration, P.H.; Software, R.D. and V.H.; Supervision, M.K.; Visualization, R.D., A.Č. and V.H.; Writing—Original draft, P.L., R.D. and V.H.; Writing—Review and editing, R.D., A.Č., P.J., M.K., P.H., K.Š., J.H., K.M., N.M., Z.P., A.K., K.P., D.J., J.M., Z.D., D.B., L.S. and V.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Czech Ministry of Health (NU21-05-00681), Charles University Research Centre program (no. 204069) and the Czech Academy of Sciences Long-term Research Development Project (RVO: 61388971).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences obtained in this study were deposited into the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The isolates were deposited into the Culture Collection of Fungi (CCF), Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lenka Zídková for the assistance in the laboratory. We are grateful to Jan Karhan for help with the graphical adjustments of analysis outputs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper. The profit organization involved in this study (private veterinary and dermatology clinics) contributed to data and material collection without any financial profit.

References

  1. Dvořák, J.; Otčenášek, M. Zoophilic dermatophytes commonly attacking man. In Mycological Diagnosis of Animal Dermatophytoses; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1969; pp. 69–84. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajello, L.; Bostick, L.; Cheng, S.-L. The relationship of Trichophyton quinckeanum to Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycologia 1968, 60, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beguin, H.; Pyck, N.; Hendrickx, M.; Planard, C.; Stubbe, D.; Detandt, M. The taxonomic status of Trichophyton quinckeanum and T. interdigitale revisited: A multigene phylogenetic approach. Med. Mycol. 2012, 50, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. De Hoog, G.S.; Dukik, K.; Monod, M.; Packeu, A.; Stubbe, D.; Hendrickx, M.; Kupsch, C.; Stielow, J.B.; Freeke, J.; Göker, M. Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 5–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Uhrlaß, S.; Schroedl, W.; Mehlhorn, C.; Krüger, C.; Hubka, V.; Maier, T.; Gräser, Y.; Paasch, U.; Nenoff, P. Molecular epidemiology of Trichophyton quinckeanum—A zoophilic dermatophyte on the rise. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2018, 16, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garcia-Sanchez, M.; Pereiro, M., Jr.; Pereiro, M.; Toribio, J. Favus due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum. Dermatology 1997, 194, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hubka, V.; Čmoková, A.; Peano, A.; Větrovský, T.; Dobiáš, R.; Mallátová, N.; Lysková, P.; Mencl, K.; Janouškovcová, H.; Stará, J.; et al. Zoonotic dermatophytoses: Clinical manifestation, diagnosis, etiology, treatment, epidemiological situation in the Czech Republic. Čes-Slov. Derm. 2018, 93, 208–235. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hubka, V.; Větrovský, T.; Dobiášová, S.; Skořepová, M.; Lysková, P.; Mencl, K.; Mallátová, N.; Janouškovcová, H.; Hanzlíčková, J.; Dobiáš, R.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of dermatophytoses in the Czech Republic—Two-year-study results. Čes-Slov. Derm. 2014, 89, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pihet, M.; Le Govic, Y. Reappraisal of conventional diagnosis for dermatophytes. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kelly, K.L. Inter-Society Color Council—National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1964.
  11. Hubka, V.; Nissen, C.; Jensen, R.; Arendrup, M.; Cmokova, A.; Kubatova, A.; Skorepova, M. Discovery of a sexual stage in Trichophyton onychocola, a presumed geophilic dermatophyte isolated from toenails of patients with a history of T. rubrum onychomycosis. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Georg, L.K.; Camp, L.B. Routine nutritional tests for the identification of dermatophytes. J. Bacteriol. 1957, 74, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gräser, Y.; Kuijpers, A.F.A.; Presber, W.; De Hoog, G.S. Molecular taxonomy of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans. Med. Mycol. 1999, 37, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hubka, V.; Nováková, A.; Jurjević, Ž.; Sklenář, F.; Frisvad, J.C.; Houbraken, J.; Arendrup, M.C.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Siqueira, J.P.; Gené, J.; et al. Polyphasic data support the splitting of Aspergillus candidus into two species; proposal of Aspergillus dobrogensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sklenář, F.; Jurjević, Ž.; Houbraken, J.; Kolařík, M.; Arendrup, M.C.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Siqueira, J.P.Z.; Gené, J.; Yaguchi, T.; Ezekiel, C.N.; et al. Re-examination of species limits in Aspergillus section Flavipedes using advanced species delimitation methods and proposal of four new species. Stud. Mycol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arendrup, M.C.; Jørgensen, K.M.; Guinea, J.; Lagrou, K.; Chryssanthou, E.; Hayette, M.-P.; Barchiesi, F.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Hamal, P.; Dannaoui, E. Multicentre validation of a EUCAST method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of microconidia-forming dermatophytes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1807–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Čmoková, A.; Kolařík, M.; Dobiáš, R.; Hoyer, L.L.; Janouškovcová, H.; Kano, R.; Kuklová, I.; Lysková, P.; Machová, L.; Maier, T.; et al. Resolving the taxonomy of emerging zoonotic pathogens in the Trichophyton benhamiae complex. Fungal Divers. 2020, 104, 333–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lysková, P.; Hubka, V.; Petřičáková, A.; Dobiáš, R.; Čmoková, A.; Kolařík, M. Equine dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton bullosum, a poorly known zoophilic dermatophyte masquerading as T. verrucosum. Mycopathologia 2015, 180, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Hoog, G.S.; Guarro, J.; Gené, J.; Figueras, M.J. Atlas of Clinical Fungi, 3rd ed.; CD-ROM; CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Besbes, M.; Cheikhrouhou, F.; Sellami, H.; Makni, F.; Bouassida, S.; Ayadi, A. Favus due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum. Mycoses 2003, 46, 358–360. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nenoff, P.; Herrmann, J.; Gräser, Y. Trichophyton mentagrophytes sive interdigitale? A dermatophyte in the course of time. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2007, 5, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hubálek, Z. Keratinophilic fungi associated with free-living mammals and birds. In Biology of Dermatophytes; Kushwaha, R.K.S., Guarro, J., Eds.; Revista Iberoamericana de Micología: Bilbao, Spain, 2000; pp. 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  25. Skořepová, M.; Štork, J.; Hrabakova, J. Tinea gladiatorum due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycoses 2002, 45, 431–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. La Touche, C.J. Mouse favus due to Trichophyton quinckeanum (Zopf) MacLeod & Muende: A reappraisal in the light of recent investigations. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1959, 11, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Chollet, A.; Cattin, V.; Fratti, M.; Mignon, B.; Monod, M. Which fungus originally was Trichophyton mentagrophytes? Historical review and illustration by a clinical case. Mycopathologia 2015, 180, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Jacob, J.; Imholt, C.; Caminero-Saldaña, C.; Couval, G.; Giraudoux, P.; Herrero-Cófreces, S.; Horváth, G.; Luque-Larena, J.J.; Tkadlec, E.; Wymenga, E. Europe-wide outbreaks of common voles in 2019. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Suchomel, J.; Šipoš, J.; Heroldová, M. Gradace hraboše polního (Microtus arvalis) v roce 2019 v řepařských výrobních oblastech a její význam z hlediska škod na řepné produkci. Listy Cukrov. Řepař. 2020, 136, 160–164. [Google Scholar]
  30. Žárová, Š. Dermatophytes Isolated from the Hair of Free-Living Rodents. Master’s Thesis, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Drouot, S.; Mignon, B.; Fratti, M.; Roosje, P.; Monod, M. Pets as the main source of two zoonotic species of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex in Switzerland, Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii and Arthroderma benhamiae. Vet. Dermatol. 2009, 20, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nenoff, P.; Uhrlaß, S.; Krüger, C.; Erhard, M.; Hipler, U.C.; Seyfarth, F.; Herrmann, J.; Wetzig, T.; Schroedl, W.; Gräser, Y. Trichophyton species von Arthroderma benhamiae—A new infectious agent in dermatology. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2014, 12, 571–582. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abarca, M.; Castellá, G.; Martorell, J.; Cabañes, F. Trichophyton erinacei in pet hedgehogs in Spain: Occurrence and revision of its taxonomic status. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Le Barzic, C.; Cmokova, A.; Denaes, C.; Arné, P.; Hubka, V.; Guillot, J.; Risco-Castillo, V. Detection and control of dermatophytosis in wild European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) admitted to a french wildlife rehabilitation centre. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hubka, V.; Peano, A.; Cmokova, A.; Guillot, J. Common and emerging dermatophytoses in animals: Well-known and new threats. In Emerging and Epizootic Fungal Infections in Animals; Seyedmousavi, S., de Hoog, G.S., Guillot, J., Verweij, P.E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 31–79. [Google Scholar]
  36. Čmoková, A.; Rezaei-Matehkolaei, A.; Kuklová, I.; Kolařík, M.; Shamsizadeh, F.; Ansari, S.; Gharaghani, M.; Miňovká, V.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Nouripour-Sisakht, S.; et al. Discovery of new Trichophyton members, T. persicum and T. spiraliforme spp. November, as a cause of highly inflammatory tinea cases in Iran and Czechia. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e00284-21. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kano, R.; Kimura, U.; Kakurai, M.; Hiruma, J.; Kamata, H.; Suga, Y.; Harada, K. Trichophyton indotineae sp. nov.: A new highly terbinafine-resistant anthropophilic dermatophyte species. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Packeu, A.; Hendrickx, M.; Beguin, H.; Martiny, D.; Vandenberg, O.; Detandt, M. Identification of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex species using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Niewerth, M.; Splanemann, V.; Korting, H.C.; Ring, J.; Abeck, D. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of dermatophytes–comparison of the agar macrodilution and broth microdilution tests. Chemotherapy 1998, 44, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Bilek, J.; Baranova, Z.; Kozak, M.; Fialkovicova, M.; Weissova, T.; Sesztakova, E. Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum as a cause of zoophilic dermatomycosis in a human family. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2005, 106, 383. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gabrielová, A.; Mencl, K.; Suchánek, M.; Klimeš, R.; Hubka, V.; Kolařík, M. The oomycete Pythium oligandrum can suppress and kill the causative agents of dermatophytoses. Mycopathologia 2018, 183, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Načeradská, M.; Fridrichová, M.; Kellnerová, D.; Peková, S.; Lány, P. Antifungal effects of the biological agent Pythium oligandrum observed in vitro. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2017, 19, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Direct microscopic examination of Trichophyton quinckeanum in a skin lesion sample (KOH + Myco-Ink stain, 400× magnification).
Figure 1. Direct microscopic examination of Trichophyton quinckeanum in a skin lesion sample (KOH + Myco-Ink stain, 400× magnification).
Jof 07 00684 g001
Figure 2. Geographic and temporal distribution of infections with Trichophyton quinckeanum in Czechia between 2016 and 2020.
Figure 2. Geographic and temporal distribution of infections with Trichophyton quinckeanum in Czechia between 2016 and 2020.
Jof 07 00684 g002
Figure 3. Macro- and micromorphology of Trichophyton quinckeanum. The obverse and reverse of colonies after two weeks of culture at 25 °C on Sabouraud dextrose agar, malt extract agar and potato dextrose agar (A, from left to right); conidiophores bearing macroconidia (B,C); free macroconidia (DG); conidiophores bearing microconidia (H,I); free microconidia (J). Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Macro- and micromorphology of Trichophyton quinckeanum. The obverse and reverse of colonies after two weeks of culture at 25 °C on Sabouraud dextrose agar, malt extract agar and potato dextrose agar (A, from left to right); conidiophores bearing macroconidia (B,C); free macroconidia (DG); conidiophores bearing microconidia (H,I); free microconidia (J). Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 07 00684 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of mass spectra of Trichophyton quinckeanum with common zoophilic Trichophyton species, (A): 4050–4200; (B): 7500–7850; (C): 7950–8250.
Figure 4. Comparison of mass spectra of Trichophyton quinckeanum with common zoophilic Trichophyton species, (A): 4050–4200; (B): 7500–7850; (C): 7950–8250.
Jof 07 00684 g004
Table 1. Human isolates of Trichophyton quinckeanum examined in this study.
Table 1. Human isolates of Trichophyton quinckeanum examined in this study.
Sample IDITS Accession NumberDate of IsolationAgePlace of ResidenceSexSite of LesionDirect MicroscopyContact with AnimalTreatment
CCF 5781MZ312189December 201623České BudějovicefemalechinnegativeN/Aterbinafine, ciclopirox, clotrimazole
CCF 6513MZ312190November 201738Měrovicefemaleforearmnegativecat, dogN/A
CCF 6457MZ312191December 201777Němčice nad HanoumalesolepositivecatN/A
CCF 6402MZ312192February 201847Polkovicefemalecalf, thigh, trunkNPN/Aterbinafine
CCF 6451MZ312193November 201813Pardubicefemaleback, shoulderpositivecatterbinafine
CCF 6403MZ312194November 201852VrbátkyfemaletrunkNPN/AN/A
CCF 6514MZ312195November 20185PřerovfemalescalpnegativecatN/A
CCF 6404MZ312196February 20199Olomoucmalechinpositivecat, dogN/A
CCF 6458MZ312197August 20195Kojetínmalescalpnegativecat, dogN/A
CCF 6405MZ312198September 201947OlomoucfemalebuttockNPcatN/A
CCF 6406MZ312199September 20195Čelechovice na Hanéfemalescalpnegativecatterbinafine
CCF 6407MZ312200October 201944Nezamyslice u ProstějovafemaleshankNPdog, cattleterbinafine
CCF 6459MZ312201December 201934Hranice na Moravěmaleforearmpositivecat, dog, rabbitciclopirox, terbinafine
CCF 6538; CCF 6453MZ312202December 201921Prostějovfemalewound, pubic areaNPN/Aterbinafine
CCF 6454MZ312203December 201941UrčicefemaletrunkNPcatterbinafine
CCF 6539MZ312204January 202015ŘíčanymalescalpnegativeN/AN/A
CCF 6460MZ312205January 202038Přerovfemaleneckpositivecatciclopirox
CCF 6455MZ312206January 202012Náměšť na Hanémaletemporal areaNPcatN/A
CCF 6461; CLIS 1379/20MZ312207February 202031Brnofemalethigh, forearmpositivecatN/A
CCF 6456MZ312208February 20209TěšeticefemalethighNPN/Afusidic acid, ciclopirox, terbinafine
CLIS 6248MZ312213June 202030BučovicefemaleforearmnegativecatN/A
CCF 6555MZ312209September 202030Slavětínmaletrunkpositivedog, rabbit, chinchillaclotrimazole
CCF 6556MZ312210September 20208Brankyfemalethigh, chestpositivecatclotrimazole, ciclopirox
CCF 6589MZ312211September 20204Dolní Lhotafemalethighpositivecatclotrimazole, ciclopirox
CCF 6590MZ312212September 20205Dolní Lhotafemalechin, knee, trunk, forearmpositivecatclotrimazole, ciclopirox
Legend: CCF—Culture Collection of Fungi, Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; NP—not performed; N/A—data not available.
Table 2. Animal isolates of Trichophyton quinckeanum examined in this study.
Table 2. Animal isolates of Trichophyton quinckeanum examined in this study.
Sample IDITS Accession NumberDate of IsolationAgeAnimal Species, RaceResidence of the OwnerSexSite/Type of LesionDirect MicroscopyTreatment/
Outcome
CCF 6540MZ312214August 20193 mEuropean Shorthair catProstějovmalegeneralized annular lesions, particularly on the trunk and extremitiespositiveEcosin a, the lesions healed after 14 days; the kitten was found on the street in Prostějov with another kitten (probably a sibling) also showing signs of dermatophytosis
CCF 6531MZ312215September 20197 yEuropean catProstějovmalethe claw bed of the right truncal extremity; a crusty lesion sized approx. 0.5 cmpositiveEcosin a and Alfadin; complete cure
CCF 6452MZ312216September 20192 mEuropean catProstějovfemalethe nose, neck, legs, inner sides of the paw pads; non-itchy crusty b lesionspositiveEcosin a and Alfadin
CCF 6528MZ312217October 20195 mBadger dogProstějovfemalethe inner side of the right ear; a crusty lesionpositiveAlfadin, Ecosin a added; the lesion healed after 14 days
CCF 6515MZ312218November 20196 mGerman ShepherdProstějovmalenose sponge; a weeping crusty lesionpositiveamoxicillin-clavulanate, Ecosin a, Alfadin; the lesion become smaller, probably healed, the owners did not come for the final check-up
CCF 6541MZ312219December 20193 mEuropean CatProstějovfemalethe nose and left ear; a crusty lesionpositiveEcosin a, Alfadin
CCF 6542MZ312220June 20202 mEuropean CatProstějovfemalethe entire body, particularly the pawspositiveEcosin a; several kittens from the same litter had signs of dermatophytosis
CCF 6529MZ312221June 20203 mEuropean CatProstějovmalescabs and crusts on the entire body, particularly the pawspositiveEcosin a
CCF 6530MZ312222July 20203 mEuropean CatProstějovfemalea lesion above the right eyepositiveEcosin a
CCF 6554MZ312223October 20202 y 7 mDachshundProstějovfemalea lesion on the nose spongepositiveEcosin a
CCF 6553MZ312224November 20205 y 3 mAmerican BulldogProstějovfemalea weeping lesion on the lippositivecephalosporins without improvement, Ecosin a with shampoo containing miconazole and chlorhexidine, Alfadin
Legend: CCF—Culture Collection of Fungi, Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; m—months; y—years; a Ecosin (preparation containing Pythium oligandrum)—treatment by full body bath 3× a week for 14 days, if not stated otherwise; b suspected tinea infection in owners, probably transmitted from cat (results of mycological examination not available for this study).
Table 3. Physiological tests results for Trichophyton quinckeanum and comparison with selected Trichophyton species.
Table 3. Physiological tests results for Trichophyton quinckeanum and comparison with selected Trichophyton species.
Growth on Media a
Species (Number of Strains)T1T2T3T4T5T6T7UreaseReference
Trichophyton quinckeanum (20)+++++-++this study
T. benhamiae var. luteum (20)+++++vvvthis study
T. europaeum (8)++++++++this study
T. erinacei (18)+++++++vthis study
T. verrucosum (NS)-+++v--v[20,21]
T. bullosum (1)--++---+this study
T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale (NS)++++++++[21]
a The tests were read after 7 and 14 days: T1—vitamin-free casamino acid agar, basal medium for agars T2–T5; T2—T1 + inositol; T3—T2 + thiamine; T4—T1 + thiamine; T5—T1 + nicotinic acid; T6—vitamin-free ammonium nitrate agar, basal medium for agar T7; T7—T6 + L-histidine; “-”—no growth; “+”—growth; “v”—variable (variable between strains of the same species); NS—the number of strains not specified.
Table 4. Antifungal susceptibility of 36 Trichophyton quinckeanum strains by EUCAST reference method E.Def 11.0.
Table 4. Antifungal susceptibility of 36 Trichophyton quinckeanum strains by EUCAST reference method E.Def 11.0.
Antifungal AgentMICs by EUCAST (mg/L)
Reading MethodRangeGMMIC50MIC90
FLUOD2–6418.381664
vis16–>6445.732>64
TEROD0.004–0.0160.0040.0040.004
vis0.004–0.080.0050.0040.004
ITROD0.008–0.1250.0230.0160.032
vis0.06–20.260.251
KETOD0.016–10.310.51
vis0.5–41.8824
CLOOD0.008–0.1250.0370.0320.064
vis0.125–0.50.260.250.5
AMOOD0.008–0.0640.020.0160.064
vis0.016–0.250.080.1250.25
CICOD0.008–10.210.250.5
vis0.25–10.6711
EFIOD0.008–0.0640.030.0320.064
vis0.03–0.250.010.1250.125
Antifungals: FLU—fluconazole; TER—terbinafine; ITR—itraconazole; KET—ketoconazole; CLO—clotrimazole; AMO—amorolfine; CIC—ciclopirox; EFI—efinaconazole; OD—optical density, i.e., MIC value read spectrophotometrically as 50% inhibition of the growth; vis—MIC value read visually as complete inhibition (no growth detected by eye); GM—geometric mean; MIC50 and MIC 90—minimum concentration at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lysková, P.; Dobiáš, R.; Čmoková, A.; Kolařík, M.; Hamal, P.; Šmatláková, K.; Hušek, J.; Mencl, K.; Mallátová, N.; Poláčková, Z.; et al. An Outbreak of Trichophyton quinckeanum Zoonotic Infections in the Czech Republic Transmitted from Cats and Dogs. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090684

AMA Style

Lysková P, Dobiáš R, Čmoková A, Kolařík M, Hamal P, Šmatláková K, Hušek J, Mencl K, Mallátová N, Poláčková Z, et al. An Outbreak of Trichophyton quinckeanum Zoonotic Infections in the Czech Republic Transmitted from Cats and Dogs. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(9):684. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090684

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lysková, Pavlína, Radim Dobiáš, Adéla Čmoková, Miroslav Kolařík, Petr Hamal, Kateřina Šmatláková, Jan Hušek, Karel Mencl, Nad’a Mallátová, Zora Poláčková, and et al. 2021. "An Outbreak of Trichophyton quinckeanum Zoonotic Infections in the Czech Republic Transmitted from Cats and Dogs" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 9: 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090684

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop