Next Article in Journal
Global Sexual Fertility in the Opportunistic Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus and Identification of New Supermater Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Bioprospecting White-Rot Basidiomycete Irpex lacteus for Improved Extraction of Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes and Their Further Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Bringing SEM and MSI Closer Than Ever Before: Visualizing Aspergillus and Pseudomonas Infection in the Rat Lungs

1
Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
4
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
5
Faculty of Science, J. E. Purkyně University, České mládeže 8, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(4), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040257
Submission received: 15 September 2020 / Revised: 15 October 2020 / Accepted: 26 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020

Abstract

:
A procedure for processing frozen rat lung tissue sections for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) from deeply frozen samples initially collected and stored for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) was developed. The procedure employed slow thawing of the frozen sections while floating on the surface and melting in a fixative solution. After the float-washing step, the sections were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and dried in a critical point dryer. The SEM generated images with well-preserved structures, allowing for monitoring of bacterial cells and fungal hyphae in the infected tissue. Importantly, the consecutive nonfixed frozen sections were fully compatible with MALDI-MSI, providing molecular biomarker maps of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The protocol enables bimodal image fusion in the in-house software CycloBranch, as demonstrated by SEM and MALDI-MSI.

1. Introduction

Imaging of human and animal tissues, individual cells, and subcellular structures plays a key role in biomedicine and cell biology research. A combination of data recorded by various imaging microscopy platforms has been developed into correlative approaches, such as correlative light electron microscopy [1], or into the correlation of cryogenic light microscopy and cryofocused ion beam scanning electron microscopy of frozen vitreous cells [2].
Merging visual morphology information with molecular or elemental mass spectrometry data is another challenge. Mutually different scales in lateral resolution and sampling with compatible sample preparation represent the main hurdles for scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) data fusion. From a mass spectrometry point of view, the most common MALDI-MSI method allows for label-free mapping of molecules, including proteins, peptides, lipids, metabolites, and small molecules, directly in tissue. The physicochemical information in a single spot may involve the molecular formula, relative ion abundance, and organic structure-specific product ion mass spectrum. To reveal structure- and function-specific information, it is possible to combine MALDI-MSI molecular maps of tissue sections with classical histology [3,4] and fluorescence microscopy [5,6]. The lateral resolution of MALDI-MSI molecular maps ranges from tens of micrometers to five micrometers [7], and unique setups can reach 1 μm [8]. The actual lateral resolution limit stems from the number of neutrals being desorbed during the desorption event combined with the compound ionization efficiency. Most often, elements or abundant lipids can be visualized in accordance with the selected ionization technique [3,4].
Analogous to MSI, wide-field optical microscopy also does not deliver images with high lateral resolution. On the other hand, SEM is capable of visualizing large samples with unprecedented resolution in a complex environment and a considerable depth of field [9] to show bacterial biofilms or bacterial cell surface details such as flagella and pili [10]. However, the preparation of biological specimens for SEM may be complicated [11], and sample chemical fixation is needed for stabilization and structural preservation. Commonly used glutaraldehyde or paraformaldehyde [12] can interfere with MALDI-MSI analysis [13] or with protein mass spectrometry in general [14,15]. Therefore, protocols with vacuum-dried [16,17,18] or lyophilized [19] frozen tissue sections were developed.
There is no information in the literature on SEM of the same or consecutive tissue sections combined with MALDI-MSI. SEM analysis has been used to monitor the quality of the matrix deposition procedure [20,21] and its influence on the laser ablation process [22]. Fincher et al. [23] used SEM as a method complementary to MALDI-MSI in their analytical study of lipids in human skin disease. They confirmed the presence of bacteria along the hair shafts on the sick surface. To bring MSI and SEM closer than ever before, we report a procedure for the processing of frozen sections for SEM from lung specimens initially collected and stored in a deep-frozen state for MALDI-MSI analysis. The optimized protocol produces samples with sufficient structural feature preservation of the lung tissue that was documented on frozen rat lung tissue infected with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Experiments

All animal experiments were conducted following the regulations and guidelines of the Czech Animal Protection Act (No. 246/1992) and with the approval of the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic (MSMT-21275/2016-2 and MSMT-9487/2019-5) and the institutional Animal Welfare Committees (Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacký University in Olomouc). Animal studies were performed using female 2–3-month-old Lewis rats (Envigo, Horst, The Netherlands). During infection models, research staff followed the general guidelines for the protection (European Parliament and the Council, 2000/54/EC, [24]). This included the strict use of protective mask FFP2/KN95, which is N95 HEPA respirator equivalent.
Fungal infection was studied in a rat model, as described previously [25]. Briefly, neutropenia was induced by intraperitoneal injections of 75 m g / k g of the cyclophosphamide (DNA-alkylating agent, Endoxan, Baxter, Prague, Czech Republic) five and one days before inoculation. A. fumigatus strain CCF 1059 infection was established by the intratracheal administration of Aspergillus spore suspension (100 μ L ) at a concentration of 1 × 108 spores/mL. Alternatively, the rats were infected intratracheally with P. aeruginosa strain ATCC 15692 100 μ L of 1 × 108 CFU/mL under 2% isoflurane anesthesia (Forane, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) to minimize animal suffering according to the protocol [26]. The animals were euthanized by exsanguination, and the lungs were immediately dissected out and deeply frozen or aldehyde fixed.

2.2. Basic Histology of Infected Lung Tissues

Dried, thaw-mounted, 15 μ m -thick frozen sections (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) were used in two histological staining protocols. Aspergillus hyphae in sections were stained by Grocott’s methenamine silver (GMS) [27] using an HT100A silver stain modified kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic). Eosin Y counterstained (VWR Chemicals, Stříbrná Skalice, Czech Republic) and dehydrated sections (ethanol, 95, and 100%) were cleared in xylene and mounted in DPX medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic). Alternatively, modified [28] Gram staining was used for specific P. aeruginosa detection. All reagent solutions were prepared from analytical grade chemicals (LaChema, Brno, Czech Republic) and double-distilled water. Safranin (Geigy, Basel, Switzerland) counterstained dehydrated sections (ethanol, 95, and 100%) were cleared in xylene and mounted in DPX medium. Permanent histological mounts of the whole-lung lobe slices were scanned in Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO (Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 4800 dpi.

2.3. Optical Microscopy

GMS-stained sections were examined under a DN45 light microscope (LAMBDA PRAHA Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic) equipped with a Canon EOS 700D Digital SLR camera (Canon, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The camera’s built-in white balance correction was used for all recorded images. Spatial calibration of the recorded images was performed with the Fiji software suite [29] using a stage (objective) micrometer. Gram-stained lung sections were examined in a Leica DM6000 light microscope equipped with a Leica DFC490 color CCD camera (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Original images in Leica image file format (.lif) were exported in TIFF format using proprietary Leica software (LAS X Life Science, v. 3.7.1.21655) or Fiji plugins. The associated image metadata were retrieved by OME Bio-Formats [30] Fiji plugins.

2.4. Float-Fixation Procedure for Whole Lung Lobe Frozen Sections

A six-well plate (Nunc Non-Treated Multidishes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) was filled with 2 m L of fixative solution (3% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) and frozen in the freezer at 20 C . Before cryosectioning, the six-well plate and deep-frozen lung lobes were conditioned in a cryo-chamber at 15 C . Then, 25 μ m –100 μ m -thick frozen sections of the lung tissue were carefully placed onto the solid surface of the fixative solution with one section per well (Figure 1, green path). The lid-covered plate was transferred into the refrigerator and maintained at 4 C until all the fixative solution completely melted, usually overnight. During the thawing process, the sections continued to float on the fixative solution and were gently fixed by glutaraldehyde diffusion. Subsequently, the sections were transferred onto the cooled cacodylate buffer level and allowed to float for 20 min three times. Washed sections were mounted onto wet coverslips and wrapped in fine copper wire mesh for easier handling. Then, the whole mounts were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, 100, 100%, 20 min each) and dried in a critical point dryer. Dried sections were mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs using ultrasmooth carbon discs (SPI Supplies, Structure Probe, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA).

2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy

All tissue samples were sputter-coated with 3 n m of platinum in high-resolution Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK) before their examination under FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 field emission gun scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic). The Navigation Montage option of the SEM software, v. 6.3.4.3233 (Helios NanoLab, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to map whole tissue sections at low resolution. Final SEM analyses were performed at acceleration voltage ranging from 2 kV to 5 kV and spot size 3 using Everhart–Thornley Detector (ETD), Circular Backscatter Detector (CBS), and Through the Lens Detector (TLD). If specimen charging was experienced, a beam deceleration mode combined with the magnetic immersion final lens [31,32,33] was used.

2.6. Image Data Processing

Proprietary software delivered with microscopes was used unless otherwise stated. In some cases, Fiji software suite, a clone of ImageJ, which is an open source image processing program [35,36], was also utilized. No image processing was applied to the images from SEM with the exception of SEM navigations images and stereo pairs for R-GB anaglyphs.

2.7. MALDI-MSI and SEM on Consecutive Sections

Liquid nitrogen snap-frozen rat lung tissue infected with P. aeruginosa was cryosectioned, thaw-mounted onto indium-tin-oxide (ITO) glass slides, and vacuum-dried in a desiccator (Figure 1, black path). The slide was then covered with α -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) MALDI matrix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Czech Republic) in the SunCollect spraying device (SunChrom, Friedrichsdorf, Germany). Before MALDI sampling, the slide was scanned in an optical scanner. Mass spectra were acquired on a SolariX 12T Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance (FT-ICR) spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 2 k Hz laser. Compound dereplication and image fusions were performed by CycloBranch software, v. 2.0.8 (Available online: https://ms.biomed.cas.cz/cyclobranch/ (accessed on 8 May 2012)) [37].

3. Results

3.1. Optical Microscopy of Lung Tissue with a Fungal or Bacterial Infection

By using GMS staining, the eccentric growth of fungal hyphae in the alveolus is shown in the dark in Figure 2A. The faint pink damaged structure of the alveolar space was counterstained by eosin Y, making bright red blood cell clusters visible. Typical stages of the A. fumigatus infectious life cycle, e.g., dissemination, uncontrolled hyphal growth through the pulmonary parenchyma, and severe tissue damage [38], were also detected in the infected rat lung tissue. Dichotomous branching of the hyphae at acute angles and individual septa, typical for Aspergillus in the infected tissues [39], were visible at higher magnification (Figure 2C).
Although it was possible to detect individual P. aeruginosa cells in the Gram-stained lung sections, their morphology could barely be judged (Figure 2B). As the bacterial cells were hardly detectable at medium magnification, the rod-shaped bacteria inside the alveolus were recorded using an oil immersion objective (Figure 2D). The images illustrate the standard data achieved in a conventional laboratory with typical staining procedures, here representing the current limits of routine optical microscopy.

3.2. Standard Tissue Thaw-Mounting in MSI Hampers Potential SEM Analysis

Vacuum-dried sections from deep frozen lung lobe mounted onto glass slide were used for SEM imaging (Figure 1, red path). As the sections were mounted onto non-conductive glass support, we experienced sample charging when the samples were imaged in secondary electrons. Therefore, backscattered electron mode was instead used for image acquisition.
It was believed that thaw-mounting keeps the sample intact from a (bio)chemical point of view [17,18], which could be true, namely, for lipid features. We showed that, after the thaw-mounting step, the surface of the vacuum-dried sections was covered with a distinct layer of dried colloids of intra- and extracellular origin, which did not interfere with the MALDI-MSI analysis but made SEM analysis useless. The SEM results were typically worse than those from an optical microscope, regardless of whether the sample was coated with the matrix.

3.3. SEM Float Fixation/Washing Procedure Preserved the Tissue Structure

Surface tension forces allowing the frozen section to float on the fixation and washing solutions were the critical factors of our procedure. In this new procedure, glutaraldehyde fixed the sections during thawing on the surface of the melting frozen fixative solution at 4 C . The remaining glutaraldehyde was then washed away by floating the sections on the surface of a cooled cacodylate buffer before further processing for SEM (Figure 1, green path).

3.4. SEM Imaging of Infected Tissues and Data Fusion with MALDI-MSI

All infected tissues were processed by the float-fixation/washing method. Figure 3 shows the lung lobe section images at low magnification with branched or cross-sectioned fungal hyphae (Figure 3A,C, respectively). The tip detail or a cross-section of fungal hyphae at higher magnification is illustrated in Figure 3B,D, respectively. The diameters of the imaged Aspergillus hyphae ranged from 1.8 μm to 3.8 μm with an average value of 2.7 μ m , which agreed well with literature data [40]. GMS stained a consecutive section was typically employed to find fungal hyphae’s specific location in the prepared SEM specimen (Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials). It was practically impossible to efficiently discover the Aspergillus hyphae in such a large tissue section without it.
Figure 3E–H is dedicated to bacterial data indicating the cells of P. aeruginosa in the alveolar space. The arrows point to a cluster of bacterial cells, apparently formed by active bacterial growth in the tissue (Figure 3G). The damaged tissue and elastin and collagen fibers along with the bacteria are illustrated in Figure 3H. The individual panels precise locations in the specific area of the whole section are presented in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S3). It confirmed the P. aeruginosa cells in the lobe’s distinct part indicated by the pyoverdine E protonated molecule map (Figure 4B,C).
As the flow fixation/washing procedure was capable of preserving fungal hyphae and bacterial cells in the frozen sections of infected tissue, the SEM images were merged with MALDI-MSI data from a consecutive section. Bacteria were detected on the alveolar surface in the section part to which pyoverdine E [41] was mapped by MALDI-MSI (Figure 4). Initially, a scanned image of the slide served for the orientation of the MALDI-MSI results (Figure 4A). Then, the pyoverdine E protonated molecule map, i.e., [C 55 H 84 N 18 O 21 +H] + , from the mass spectrometry imaging imzML data format was merged with a scanned slide image in CycloBranch software [37] and manually matched with SEM navigation image (Figure 4B,C). Next, all SEM images of the set recorded from the region of the section with a reliable pyoverdine signal were automatically aligned with the navigation image in CycloBranch software using the TIFF file metadata. The two squares indicated in Figure 4D illustrate the 50 μ m × 50 μ m area irradiated by the laser beam containing the rod-shaped bacterial cells.

4. Discussion

Round-shaped irradiated areas (a Gaussian beam profile [22]) with a diameter of ten micrometers are usually collected for bimodal fusion of MALDI-MSI with optical microscopy [37]. At this lateral resolution, the highly abundant siderophore molecules that are microbe-characteristic can be detected. One of the very first reports was ferricrocin molecular imaging in rat lungs heavily infected with A. fumigatus [25]. However, extensive hemorrhage and considerable tissue damage caused by the lasers destroyed most of the morphological details [42]. One must consider the dynamic range of the MALDI-MSI experiment. In theory, it is possible to scale down the MSI experiment to a single cell or even to the subcellular scale [43,44]. However, only the most abundant, i.e., functionally or diagnostically fewer interesting molecules, can then be visualized.
Optical microscopy has not been able to provide sufficiently detailed structural features but served as a quick tool for examination of the extent of fungal or bacterial infection in rat lung tissue. Nevertheless, eccentric growth of fungus in alveolus (Figure 2A) and other characteristic morphological features for Aspergillus in the infected tissues [39,40,45] are clearly documented at higher magnification (Figure 2C). The quality of the SEM images recorded from samples prepared by float-fixation method corresponded to the literature data [46]. Importantly, for the infected tissue studies, the sections handled by the float/washing protocol did not exhibit excessive flattening (Figure S1, with 3D R-GB anaglyphs), as was observed for the vacuum-dried samples.
At a higher magnification than that shown in Figure 4D, a distinct displacement of the SEM image can be observed. The bacterial density does not precisely reflect the molecular intensity of the pyoverdine signal, which is caused by different processing of the frozen sections for both imaging methods (Figure 1). A slight alteration of the tissue structure in some parts of 20 μm to 40 μm-thick sections can be observed more frequently than that in thicker cuts (50 μ m to 100 μ m ), which better withstand physical stress during processing.
To conclude, preservation of the lung tissue structure in the samples infected with A. fumigatus or P. aeruginosa was sufficient for detailed SEM analysis of alveolar space colonized with both microorganisms. The uncomplicated flow-fixation/washing method is not limited to lung tissue and can be used to process frozen sections from other soft biological tissues. It does not require any specialized tools or sophisticated equipment and is feasible for any standard laboratory with occasional access to an electron microscopy facility. Of final note, the float-fixation procedure worked even for relatively large sections with an area exceeding 50 mm2. In other words, sections through the whole rat lung lobe can be processed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available at https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/6/4/257/s1. Figure S1: Stereo images (R-GB anaglyphs) of float-fixed cryosection from rat lung tissue infected with A. fumigatus. Figure S2: A comparison of scanning electron microscopy and histology of Aspergillus fumigatus infected rat lung tissue. Figure S3: Scanning electron microscopy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected rat lung tissue and exact localization of the areas from which high-resolution images were taken.

Author Contributions

O.B., formal data analysis and microscopic images processing; T.J., D.L., O.K., and O.B., microscopy; T.J., H.M., and A.P., microbiology; A.Š. and V.H., MALDI-MSI; J.N., image fusion; M.P., animal infection models and organ/lung collection; T.J. and O.B., writing—original draft; and V.H., data curation, formal analysis, revision and editing, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, grant number LO1509, and the Czech Science Foundation, grant number 19-10907S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
CBSCircular Backscatter Detector
CCFCulture Collection of Fungi
CFUColony Forming Unit
CHCA α -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid
ETDEverhart–Thornley Detector
FT-ICRFourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance
GMSGrocott’s methenamine silver
LN 2 Liquid nitrogen
MALDI-MSIMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging
MSMTCzech Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic
R-GBRed–green–blue (red–cyan)
R.T.Room temperature
SEMScanning electron microscopy
TLDThrough the Lens Detector

References

  1. Fonta, C.L.; Humbel, B.M. Correlative microscopy. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 581, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoffman, D.P.; Shtengel, G.; Xu, C.S.; Campbell, K.R.; Freeman, M.; Wang, L.; Milkie, D.E.; Pasolli, H.A.; Iyer, N.; Bogovic, J.A.; et al. Correlative three-dimensional super-resolution and block-face electron microscopy of whole vitreously frozen cells. Science 2020, 367, eaaz5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mallah, K.; Quanico, J.; Raffo-Romero, A.; Cardon, T.; Aboulouard, S.; Devos, D.; Kobeissy, F.; Zibara, K.; Salzet, M.; Fournier, I. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Lipids in Experimental Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Detecting Acylcarnitines as Injury Related Markers. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 11879–11887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Murphy, R.C.; Hankin, J.A.; Barkley, R.M. Imaging of lipid species by MALDI mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 2008, 50, S317–S322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chaurand, P.; Cornett, D.S.; Angel, P.M.; Caprioli, R.M. From Whole-body Sections Down to Cellular Level, Multiscale Imaging of Phospholipids by MALDI Mass Spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010, 10, O110.004259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kaya, I.; Michno, W.; Brinet, D.; Iacone, Y.; Zanni, G.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Hanrieder, J. Histology-Compatible MALDI Mass Spectrometry Based Imaging of Neuronal Lipids for Subsequent Immunofluorescent Staining. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 4685–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Feenstra, A.D.; Due nas, M.E.; Lee, Y.J. Five Micron High Resolution MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging with Simple, Interchangeable, Multi-Resolution Optical System. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 28, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Niehaus, M.; Soltwisch, J.; Belov, M.E.; Dreisewerd, K. Transmission-mode MALDI-2 mass spectrometry imaging of cells and tissues at subcellular resolution. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goldstein, J.I.; Newbury, D.E.; Michael, J.R.; Ritchie, N.W.M.; Scott, J.H.J.; Joy, D.C. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis; Springer: New York, NY, UYA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bystrianský, L.; Hujslová, M.; Hršelová, H.; Řezáčová, V.; Němcová, L.; Šimsová, J.; Gryndlerová, H.; Kofroňová, O.; Benada, O.; Gryndler, M. Observations on two microbial life strategies in soil: Planktonic and biofilm-forming microorganisms are separable. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2019, 136, 107535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fischer, E.R.; Hansen, B.T.; Nair, V.; Hoyt, F.H.; Dorward, D.W. Scanning Electron Microscopy. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2012, 25, 2B.2.1–2B.2.47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayat, M.A. Fixation for Electron Microscopy; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shen, C.H. Quantification and Analysis of Proteins. In Diagnostic Molecular Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Chapter 8; pp. 187–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Metz, B.; Kersten, G.F.A.; Hoogerhout, P.; Brugghe, H.F.; Timmermans, H.A.M.; de Jong, A.; Meiring, H.; ten Hove, J.; Hennink, W.E.; Crommelin, D.J.A.; et al. Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 279, 6235–6243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Norris, J.L.; Caprioli, R.M. Analysis of Tissue Specimens by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Biological and Clinical Research. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2309–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Caldwell, R.L.; Caprioli, R.M. Tissue Profiling by Mass Spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2005, 4, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ferguson, C.N.; Fowler, J.W.M.; Waxer, J.F.; Gatti, R.A.; Loo, J.A. Mass Spectrometry-Based Tissue Imaging of Small Molecules. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Woods, A.G., Darie, C.C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tucker, K.R.; Lanni, E.J.; Serebryannyy, L.A.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Sweedler, J.V. Stretched Tissue Mounting for MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 9181–9185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Anderson, D.M.G.; Floyd, K.A.; Barnes, S.; Clark, J.M.; Clark, J.I.; Mchaourab, H.; Schey, K.L. A method to prevent protein delocalization in imaging mass spectrometry of non-adherent tissues: Application to small vertebrate lens imaging. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 2311–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bowman, A.P.; Bogie, J.F.J.; Hendriks, J.J.A.; Haidar, M.; Belov, M.; Heeren, R.M.A.; Ellis, S.R. Evaluation of lipid coverage and high spatial resolution MALDI-imaging capabilities of oversampling combined with laser post-ionisation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 412, 2277–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tucker, L.H.; Conde-González, A.; Cobice, D.; Hamm, G.R.; Goodwin, R.J.A.; Campbell, C.J.; Clarke, D.J.; Mackay, C.L. MALDI Matrix Application Utilizing a Modified 3D Printer for Accessible High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8742–8749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wiegelmann, M.; Dreisewerd, K.; Soltwisch, J. Influence of the Laser Spot Size, Focal Beam Profile, and Tissue Type on the Lipid Signals Obtained by MALDI-MS Imaging in Oversampling Mode. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2016, 27, 1952–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fincher, J.A.; Jones, D.R.; Korte, A.R.; Dyer, J.E.; Parlanti, P.; Popratiloff, A.; Brantner, C.A.; Morris, N.J.; Pirlo, R.K.; Shanmugam, V.K.; et al. Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Lipids in Human Skin Disease Model Hidradenitis Suppurativa by Laser Desorption Ionization from Silicon Nanopost Arrays. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. DIRECTIVE 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (seventh individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Off. J. Eur. Communities 2020, 45, 21–46. [Google Scholar]
  25. Luptáková, D.; Pluháček, T.; Petřík, M.; Novák, J.; Palyzová, A.; Sokolová, L.; Škríba, A.; Šedivá, B.; Lemr, K.; Havlíček, V. Non-invasive and invasive diagnoses of aspergillosis in a rat model by mass spectrometry. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Petřík, M.; Umlaufová, E.; Raclavský, V.; Palyzová, A.; Havlíček, V.; Haas, H.; Nový, Z.; Doležal, D.; Hajduch, M.; Decristoforo, C. Imaging of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection with Ga-68 labelled pyoverdine for positron emission tomography. Sci. Rep. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Grocott, R.G. A Stain for Fungi in Tissue Sections and Smears. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1955, 25, 975–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Becerra, S.C.; Roy, D.C.; Sanchez, C.J.; Christy, R.J.; Burmeister, D.M. An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Linkert, M.; Rueden, C.T.; Allan, C.; Burel, J.M.; Moore, W.; Patterson, A.; Loranger, B.; Moore, J.; Neves, C.; MacDonald, D.; et al. Metadata matters: Access to image data in the real world. J. Cell. Biol. 2010, 189, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Khursheed, A. Ultimate resolution limits for scanning electron microscope immersion objective lenses. Optik 2002, 113, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Müllerová, I.; Lenc, M. Some approaches to low-voltage scanning electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 1992, 41, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Phifer, D.; Tůma, L.; Vystavěl, T.; Wandrol, P.; Young, R.J. Improving SEM imaging performance using beam deceleration. Micros. Today 2009, 17, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xiao, N.; Li, M. Scientific Journal and Sci-Fi Themed Color Palettes for ’ggplot2’, R Package Version 2.9; 2018. Available online: https://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?cluster=15844498918001731978&hl=zh-CN&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5 (accessed on 15 August 2020).
  35. Rueden, C.T.; Schindelin, J.; Hiner, M.C.; DeZonia, B.E.; Walter, A.E.; Arena, E.T.; Eliceiri, K.W. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Novák, J.; Škríba, A.; Havlíček, V. CycloBranch 2: Molecular Formula Annotations Applied to imzML Data Sets in Bimodal Fusion and LC-MS Data Files. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 6844–6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dagenais, T.R.T.; Keller, N.P. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus Fumigatus Invasive Aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Guarner, J.; Brandt, M.E. Histopathologic Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in the 21st Century. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 247–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kradin, R.L.; Mark, E.J. The pathology of pulmonary disorders due to Aspergillus Spp. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008, 132, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Novák, J.; Škríba, A.; Zápal, J.; Kuzma, M.; Havlíček, V. CycloBranch: An open tool for fine isotope structures in conventional and product ion mass spectra. J. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 53, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pluháček, T.; Petřík, M.; Luptáková, D.; Benada, O.; Palyzová, A.; Lemr, K.; Havlíček, V. Aspergillus infection monitored by multimodal imaging in a rat model. Proteomics 2016, 16, 1785–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lanni, E.J.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Sweedler, J.V. Mass spectrometry imaging and profiling of single cells. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 5036–5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Passarelli, M.K.; Ewing, A.G. Single-cell imaging mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2013, 17, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R.; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Inagawa, R.; Okada, H.; Takemura, G.; Suzuki, K.; Takada, C.; Yano, H.; Ando, Y.; Usui, T.; Hotta, Y.; Miyazaki, N.; et al. Ultrastructural Alteration of Pulmonary Capillary Endothelial Glycocalyx during Endotoxemia. Chest 2018, 154, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. An overview of lung sample processing for SEM and MSI. The individual steps of the float-fixation/washing procedure are shown in green. MALDI-MSI samples directly prepared for SEM are enhanced in red. Additionally, parallel processing of frozen vacuum-dried lung tissue sections for MALDI-MSI analysis is shown in black in the left part of the panel. Color coding was selected according to AAAS color palette [34]. LN 2 , liquid nitrogen; R.T., room temperature.
Figure 1. An overview of lung sample processing for SEM and MSI. The individual steps of the float-fixation/washing procedure are shown in green. MALDI-MSI samples directly prepared for SEM are enhanced in red. Additionally, parallel processing of frozen vacuum-dried lung tissue sections for MALDI-MSI analysis is shown in black in the left part of the panel. Color coding was selected according to AAAS color palette [34]. LN 2 , liquid nitrogen; R.T., room temperature.
Jof 06 00257 g001
Figure 2. Histological examination of GMS-stained rat lungs infected with A. fumigatus hyphae (A,C) and Gram-stained P. aeruginosa cells (B,D). (A) Spreading of the fungus into the alveolar space. (B) Bacterial infection, 40× objective. (C) Septate (arrows) and branching hyphae. (D) Individual bacterial cells (arrows), single or in distinct clusters imaged with a 100× immersion objective. (A) A Leica built-in white balance compensation and (D) a custom white balance compensation were used. (B,C) The camera’s built-in white balance correction was used. Scale bars: 30 μ m (A,B) and 10 μ m (C,D).
Figure 2. Histological examination of GMS-stained rat lungs infected with A. fumigatus hyphae (A,C) and Gram-stained P. aeruginosa cells (B,D). (A) Spreading of the fungus into the alveolar space. (B) Bacterial infection, 40× objective. (C) Septate (arrows) and branching hyphae. (D) Individual bacterial cells (arrows), single or in distinct clusters imaged with a 100× immersion objective. (A) A Leica built-in white balance compensation and (D) a custom white balance compensation were used. (B,C) The camera’s built-in white balance correction was used. Scale bars: 30 μ m (A,B) and 10 μ m (C,D).
Jof 06 00257 g002
Figure 3. SEM backscattered electron imaging of float-fixed cryosections from rat lung lobes. (AD) Lung tissue infected with A. fumigatus, 100 μ m -thick cryosections. (A,B) Fungal hyphae invading the pulmonary parenchyma. The arrow points to the hyphae tip. (C,D) Cross-sectioned hyphae (arrows) in the alveolar space. (EH) Lung tissue infected with P. aeruginosa, 50 μ m -thick cryosections. (E,F) Overview images of alveolar space with bacteria. (G,H) Bacteria in damaged tissue. Arrows point to individual bacterial cells. Primary magnification of SEM images were: (A) 1000×; (B,C) 3500×; (D) 10,000×; (E) 6500×; (F) 12,000×; (G) 20,000×; and (H) 25,000×. Scale bars: 100 μ m (A); 20 μ m (B,C,E); 10 μ m (D,F); and 5 μ m (G,H).
Figure 3. SEM backscattered electron imaging of float-fixed cryosections from rat lung lobes. (AD) Lung tissue infected with A. fumigatus, 100 μ m -thick cryosections. (A,B) Fungal hyphae invading the pulmonary parenchyma. The arrow points to the hyphae tip. (C,D) Cross-sectioned hyphae (arrows) in the alveolar space. (EH) Lung tissue infected with P. aeruginosa, 50 μ m -thick cryosections. (E,F) Overview images of alveolar space with bacteria. (G,H) Bacteria in damaged tissue. Arrows point to individual bacterial cells. Primary magnification of SEM images were: (A) 1000×; (B,C) 3500×; (D) 10,000×; (E) 6500×; (F) 12,000×; (G) 20,000×; and (H) 25,000×. Scale bars: 100 μ m (A); 20 μ m (B,C,E); 10 μ m (D,F); and 5 μ m (G,H).
Jof 06 00257 g003
Figure 4. The fusion of MALDI-MSI and SEM imaging of rat lung tissue infected with P. aeruginosa: (A) optical scan of the ITO glass slide with the vacuum-dried section; (B) optical scan image with MALDI-MSI pyoverdine molecular map in the overlay; (C,B) fusion with the SEM navigation image; and (D) zoomed-in part of the fused images showing rod-shaped bacteria on the alveolar surface (white arrow, also demonstrated in (K,L)). Image fusion was generated from an SEM image (J) with a lateral resolution of 100 nm per pixel and a part of the pyoverdine molecular map. The size of the transparent blue squares in the overlay corresponds to the lateral resolution of 50 µm per pixel. (EL) A set of the original SEM images used for detailed characterization of the area with a positive pyoverdine signal. Primary magnifications of the SEM images were: (E) 85×; (F) 170×; (G) 340×; (H) 680×; (I) 1360×; (J) 2720×; (K) 5440× and (L) 10,880×. Scalebars: (AC) 2 mm; (D) 20 μ m ; (E) 1 mm; (F) 500 μ m ; (G) 250 μ m ; (H) 100 μ m ; (I) 50 μ m ; (J) 25 μ m ; (K) 10 μ m ; and (L) 5 μ m .
Figure 4. The fusion of MALDI-MSI and SEM imaging of rat lung tissue infected with P. aeruginosa: (A) optical scan of the ITO glass slide with the vacuum-dried section; (B) optical scan image with MALDI-MSI pyoverdine molecular map in the overlay; (C,B) fusion with the SEM navigation image; and (D) zoomed-in part of the fused images showing rod-shaped bacteria on the alveolar surface (white arrow, also demonstrated in (K,L)). Image fusion was generated from an SEM image (J) with a lateral resolution of 100 nm per pixel and a part of the pyoverdine molecular map. The size of the transparent blue squares in the overlay corresponds to the lateral resolution of 50 µm per pixel. (EL) A set of the original SEM images used for detailed characterization of the area with a positive pyoverdine signal. Primary magnifications of the SEM images were: (E) 85×; (F) 170×; (G) 340×; (H) 680×; (I) 1360×; (J) 2720×; (K) 5440× and (L) 10,880×. Scalebars: (AC) 2 mm; (D) 20 μ m ; (E) 1 mm; (F) 500 μ m ; (G) 250 μ m ; (H) 100 μ m ; (I) 50 μ m ; (J) 25 μ m ; (K) 10 μ m ; and (L) 5 μ m .
Jof 06 00257 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Juříková, T.; Luptáková, D.; Kofroňová, O.; Škríba, A.; Novák, J.; Marešová, H.; Palyzová, A.; Petřík, M.; Havlíček, V.; Benada, O. Bringing SEM and MSI Closer Than Ever Before: Visualizing Aspergillus and Pseudomonas Infection in the Rat Lungs. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040257

AMA Style

Juříková T, Luptáková D, Kofroňová O, Škríba A, Novák J, Marešová H, Palyzová A, Petřík M, Havlíček V, Benada O. Bringing SEM and MSI Closer Than Ever Before: Visualizing Aspergillus and Pseudomonas Infection in the Rat Lungs. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(4):257. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Juříková, Tereza, Dominika Luptáková, Olga Kofroňová, Anton Škríba, Jiří Novák, Helena Marešová, Andrea Palyzová, Miloš Petřík, Vladimír Havlíček, and Oldřich Benada. 2020. "Bringing SEM and MSI Closer Than Ever Before: Visualizing Aspergillus and Pseudomonas Infection in the Rat Lungs" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 4: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop