Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Anticarcinogenic Activity of Surface Modified/Functionalized Nanochitosan: The Emerging Trends and Endeavors
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption of Uranium, Mercury, and Rare Earth Elements from Aqueous Solutions onto Magnetic Chitosan Adsorbents: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Three Destinies of Solution-Processable Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes under Long-Time Operation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Impedance Spectroscopy of Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/Montmorillonite Composites

by
Udit Acharya
1,2,
Patrycja Bober
1,
Muhammed Arshad Thottappali
1,2,
Zuzana Morávková
1,
Magdalena Konefał
1 and
Jiří Pfleger
1,*
1
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, 162 06 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(18), 3132; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183132
Submission received: 27 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021

Abstract

:
Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/montmorillonite (PPDA/MMT) composites were prepared by the oxidative polymerization of monomers intercalated within the MMT gallery, using ammonium peroxydisulfate as an oxidant. The intercalation process was evidenced by X-ray powder diffraction. The FT-IR and Raman spectroscopies revealed that, depending on the initial ratio between monomers and MMT in the polymerization mixture, the polymer or mainly oligomers are created during polymerization. The DC conductivity of composites was found to be higher than the conductivity of pristine polymer, reaching the highest value of 10−6 S cm−1 for the optimal MMT amount used during polymerization. Impedance spectroscopy was performed over wide frequency and temperature ranges to study the charge transport mechanism. The data analyzed in the framework of conductivity formalism suggest different conduction mechanisms for high and low temperature regions.

1. Introduction

Composite materials based on polymers and inorganic materials have attracted increasing attention recently, thanks to the possibility of achieving superior properties by a combination of physical and chemical properties of the constituting components [1,2]. Such organic–inorganic composites are often applied as electrode materials in batteries [3,4] and supercapacitors [5]. Recently, composites composed of conjugated polymers or oligomers and clay fillers gained significant research interest due to their improved electrical, optical and mechanical properties, as well as corrosion resistance [6,7]. Montmorillonite (MMT) is a 2D layered phyllosilicate clay built of two tetrahedral and one octahedral sheet, which has been widely used in the preparation of nanocomposites due to its low cost, abundance in nature, zero toxicity, high specific surface area, swelling abilities and ion-exchange properties [8,9]. Various MMT composites with polyaniline [8,10], polypyrrole [11,12], poly (3,4-ethylenediaoxythiophene) [13] and polyphenylenediamine [14,15] were prepared by chemical [8,12] or electrochemical [13] polymerization and have been used as electrode material for oxygen reduction [16], anticorrosion coatings [6,11], sensors [17,18], conducting fillers [19], adsorbents [20] and supercapacitors [7].
In recent years, growing interest in the development of polyphenylenediamine composites can be observed [14,21,22,23,24,25]. Polyphenylenediamine is a conjugated polymer with a structure closely related to polyaniline; however, it possesses a higher nitrogen content and better solubility together with good redox properties, salt–base transition and environmental stability [23,26,27]. Nascimento et al. prepared poly(p-phenylenediamine)/MMT composites via oxidative polymerization and confirmed the successful formation of the polymer within the MMT gallery by extensive structural characterizations [14]. Ramya et al. studied the nonlinear optical properties of chitosan/o- or p-phenylenediamine/MMT composites by the Z-scan technique with picosecond and femtosecond laser pulses and revealed properties that make this material suitable for optical limiters [15]. Khelifa et al. examined the electrochemical properties of poly (o-phenylenediamie)/clay composites by cyclic voltammetry [28]. However, polyphenylenediamine/clay composites have still been described in the literature to a limited extent and impedance spectroscopy of them has not been yet reported. The conductivity of these composites can be contributed by electronic and ionic contribution, differing in their sensitivity to temperature, humidity and frequency response. Impedance spectroscopy is an important tool to elucidate the charge transport mechanism and the type of charge carriers in complex systems. For this, various formalisms are offered: conductivity, dielectric loss and modulus [29,30]. Knowing the conductivity mechanism is important for the development of the next generation of electronic devices, electrorheological fluids, as well as anticorrosive coatings, and optimizing their properties [31].
In this work, a series of poly(p-phenylenediamine)/montmorillonite (PPDA/MMT) composites with various monomer to clay ratios has been prepared by in situ chemical oxidation of monomers within the MMT gallery (Scheme 1). Their structure and morphology were investigated by FT-IR and Raman spectroscopies, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The impedance was measured in a wide frequency and temperature range and the AC conductivity mechanism was elucidated. We present here a detail impedance characterization to understand the conduction mechanism at different temperature regions. For the first time, the synergic effect in electrical, thermal, dielectric, impedance and modulus properties of PPDA/MMT composites has been investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Composites

p-Phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (≥98%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland), ammonium peroxydisulfate from Lach:Ner (Neratovice, Czech Republic) and montmorillonite (Cloisite-Na+) from Southern Clay Products (Gonzales, TX, USA). All chemicals were used as received without any further purification.
In a typical process, 3.62 g of p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (PDA) was dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water. Various amounts of MMT (0 g, 2 g, 5 g, 10 g, 15 g, 25 g, 35 g and 50 g, respectively) were added into the PDA solution, and the mixture was sonicated for 5 h. The amount of 5.71 g of ammonium peroxydisulfate was dissolved in 50 mL deionized water and added to the PDA/MMT dispersion under magnetic stirring. The total concentration of monomer and oxidant in each polymerization mixture was 0.2 M and 0.25 M, respectively. After 1 h of intense stirring, the mixture was left undisturbed to polymerize for 24 h. The obtained precipitates were filtered and washed with deionized water and ethanol to remove by-products. The final products, poly(p-phenylenediamine)/montmorillonite (PPDA/MMT) composites with different amounts of MMT, were labeled as PPDA-X, where X accounts for the amount of MMT added to the reaction mixture.

2.2. Characterization

Morphology of composites was assessed using MAIA3 Tescan scanning electron microscope (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic).
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the composites was performed on a Perkin Elmer Pyris 1 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Thermogravimetric Analyzer in a temperature range 35–800 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 with fixed air flow rate at 25 mL min−1.
FTIR spectra in the wavenumber range from 400 to 4000 cm−1 were obtained on the composites admixed in KBr pellets using a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 870 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a DTGS detector. The instrument was purged with dry air. All spectra were corrected for the presence of water vapor and carbon dioxide in the optical path.
Raman spectra were measured with a Renishaw InVia Reflex Raman microspectrometer using 514 nm excitation provided by an Ar-ion laser. The scattered light was registered with a Peltier-cooled CCD detector (576 × 384 pixels) and analyzed by the spectrograph with holographic grating 2400 lines mm−1.
XRD measurements were performed using a pinhole camera (MolMet, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan, upgraded by SAXSLAB/Xenocs) attached to a micro-focused X-ray beam generator (Rigaku MicroMax 003) operating at 0.6 mA and 50 kV. The camera was equipped with a vacuum version of the Pilatus 300K detector. The sample to detector distance, which was calibrated using a silver behenate powder sample, was 0.190 m. The scattering vector q, defined as q = 4π/λ·sinΘ, where λ is the wavelength and 2Θ is the scattering angle, covered the range 0.145–1.41 Å−1 (2θ = 2–20°).
The DC conductivity values were obtained on compressed pellets (diameter 13 mm and thickness 1.0 ± 0.2 mm) using van der Pauw method. A Keithley 230 Programmable Voltage Source in serial connection with a Keithley 196 System DMM was used as a current source. The potential difference was measured using a Keithley 617 Programmable electrometer or Keithley 181 nanovoltmeter, respectively, depending on the resistance of the sample. The DC conductivity measurements were carried out at stable ambient conditions at temperature 23 ± 1 °C and relative humidity 35 ± 5%. The frequency and temperature dependences of the impedance were measured in a quasi-steady-state regime using an Alpha-A Analyzer (Novocontrol Technologies, Montabaur, Germany) under applied AC voltage 1 Vrms in the frequency range 107 to 10−2 Hz and temperature range 115 to 435 K with 20 K step in nitrogen atmosphere. For clarity, only curves for selected representative temperatures are shown in the figures. The pellets were placed in the sample holder between the gold-plated brass disk electrodes 13 mm in diameter.

3. Results and Discussion

In the first step of preparation, the p-phenylenediamine was intercalated into the MMT gallery, replacing Na+ cations of Na+-MMT with p-phenylenediamine cations. After the oxidative polymerization with APS, the amount of MMT in the resulting composites, listed in Table 1, was evaluated from TGA analysis (Figure 1). The results clearly demonstrate that even with a significant excess of monomers in the polymerization mixture, just around 7–8 wt% of PDA (Table 1) was intercalated into MMT and the rest remained in the surrounding aqueous medium and was removed later as a by-product during the purification procedure. This can be explained by the limited amount of PPDA that can be formed within the MMT gallery, based on limitations imposed by cation exchange in MMT. Additionally, when an excess of PDA was used, the MMT surface became coated with PPDA film, and the amount of PPDA in the composite reached 18–19 wt% (Table 1). These results are also in good agreement with the previously demonstrated synthesis of polyaniline/MMT composites [8]. The amount of MMT in the composites reached a plateau of ~93 wt% when less than ~25 wt% of PDA was used in the polymerization mixture; however, the properties and nature of such composites differ and are discussed below.
The morphology of both pristine components, MMT and PPDA, and their composites was investigated by SEM (Figure 2). Pristine MMT consists of flake-like particles of irregular shape (Figure 2a), while PPDA possesses globular morphology (Figure 2b), as already described in the literature [24]. After composite preparation, the morphology of MMT did not show considerable changes even at an excess of monomers (Figure 2c,d). No globular particles of PDPA were observed either. This confirms that the PPDA/MMT composites contain only PDPA embedded within the MMT galleries, or as a thin film covering MMT flakes, which cannot be seen in SEM. Free PPDA precipitate was evidently removed during the washing procedure.
The DC conductivity (Table 1) of all composites was found to be higher than for pristine PPDA (7 × 10−11 S cm−1), reaching ~10−6 S cm−1, the value close to pure MMT, refs.[32,33] for PPDA-35, where a higher amount of MMT was used in the polymerization mixture.

3.1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

XRD patterns of pristine MMT and PPDA and their composites with different amounts of MMT are presented in Figure 3. For pristine MMT, a well-defined (001) Bragg reflection at 2θ = 8.41° was observed, corresponding to a basal spacing d of 10.5 Ǻ. For the composites, the reflection peaks of the (001) plane were displaced towards the lower 2θ values, which denotes the basal spacing expansion with respect to the pure MMT. The biggest change in basal spacing was observed for samples containing the lowest amount of MMT (PPDA-2 and PPDA-5), for which d = 12.5 Ǻ. The basal spacing expresses the sum of the thickness of one aluminosilicate layer and interlayer spacing, which can be affected by the size and orientation of interlayer ions. Assuming the thickness of the aluminosilicate layer of 9.8 Ǻ [34], the interlayer spacing for PPDA-2 and PPDA-5 composites expanded from 0.7 Ǻ (for pure MMT) to 2.7 Ǻ. This is a consequence of the intercalation process of PPDA chains in between the clay layers. The (001) reflections were in these cases sharp and narrow, indicating that the distribution of PPDA chains in the MMT galleries was uniform. A smaller increase in basal spacing was observed for samples containing a bigger amount of clay, reaching d = 11.7 Ǻ for the PPDA-50 sample. Moreover, the (001) diffraction peaks became much broader and less intense, which may suggest an inhomogeneous distribution of the polymer chains in the interlayers of MMT and possible partial exfoliation of MMT. These results suggest that the swelling of the MMT is related to the amount of PDA able to penetrate into MMT layers. A small signal around 2θ = 8.7°, visible in composite patterns, probably came from a small amount of MMT that was not intercalated during the synthesis of PPDA. The shift from 8.41° to 8.7° can be related to a decrease in basal spacing d, caused by the leaching of the interlayer cations [35]. The lack of this peak in the PPDA-50 pattern also suggests the possible partial exfoliation of MMT.

3.2. Infrared and Raman Spectroscopies

The FTIR spectra of the PPDA/MMT composites (Figure 4) mainly display the features of the MMT component: 1440 cm−1 (CO3 stretching of calcite impurity), 1035 cm−1 (Si–O stretching) with shoulders at 1120 cm−1 (Si–O stretching) and 915 cm−1 (Al–Al–OH bending), 520 cm−1 (Al–O–Si bending) with a shoulder at 625 cm−1, 465 cm−1 (Si–O–Si bending) and 1635 cm−1 (bending vibrations of water molecules hydrogen bonded to MMT or residual moisture in KBr) [36]. The bands associated with the PPDA component are well resolved only in the spectrum of the composite with the lowest amount of MMT (PPDA-5), and therefore the molecular structure of the PDA oxidation products will be discussed in detail based on Raman spectroscopy. However, let us mention the peak at 1656 cm−1 in the spectrum of PPDA-50. We suspect this band can be related to C=O stretching of the benzoquinone structure [37,38,39].
For the Raman spectroscopy (Figure 5), excitation at 514 nm was chosen to minimize the background caused by MMT fluorescence. The spectrum of the neat PPDA resembles the PANI-like structure reported many times in previous literature. The main bands are observed at 1595 cm−1 (C=C stretching in a quinonoid ring), 1530 cm−1 (N–H stretching), 1330 cm−1 (C~N+● stretching vibration related to a delocalized polaron structure), 1180 cm−1 (C–H deformation), 570 cm−1, 500 cm−1, 455 cm−1 and 410 cm−1 (ring deformations) [8,23,40,41]. The spectra of all composites mainly show peaks related to MMT, but there are also some peaks, visible particularly in the PPDA-50 composite with the highest amount of MMT, which occur neither in PPDA nor in MMT. Namely, the relatively strong and sharp peak at 1686 cm−1 observed for the PPDA-50 composite has not yet been observed for any PANI of PPDA-related material. This band can be related to the NH2 end-groups [42]. The strong peak at 1637 cm−1 dominates the spectrum. It was formerly assigned to ring stretching in phenazine-like [43] or oxazine-like structures [44]; however, in detailed spectroscopy studies of phenazine structures [43,45], this peak was only observed in neutral N-phenyl phenazine. However, due to the expected high local acidity in the MMT interlayer area, N-phenyl phenazine should occur there only in protonated form. The strong peak at 1637 cm−1 could also originate in NH deformation vibrations [46] or benzenoid ring stretching [47,48], which seems to be a more likely assignment. The band at 1515 cm−1 is assigned to the N–H deformation of the PANI-like structure [49,50,51,52]. The bands at 1485 and 1457 cm−1 belong to C=N stretching in quinonoid units [53], and N=N stretching in an azobenzene structure can contribute to the latter [54]. The bands at 1393, 1370 and 1345 cm−1 can be attributed to C~N+● stretching in polaron structures with varying delocalization lengths [40,55]. The bands at 1265 and 1200 cm−1 belong to C–H deformation in quinonoid and benzenoid rings, respectively. The band at 455 cm−1 is due to out-of-plane ring deformations [40]. In conclusion, a generally PANI-like structure was observed in the PPDA-50 composite, but given the strong signal of NH2 groups and the contribution of highly localized polarons, the material intercalated in MMT seems to be of oligomer nature. The Raman spectra of PPDA-35 and PPDA-5 composites reflect both features of the oligomer observed in PPDA-50 and of the PPDA polymer, with the intensity of the above discussed peaks at 1393, 1370, 1686 and 1637 cm−1 increasing with the MMT content.

3.3. Impedance Spectroscopy

The real part (ε′) and imaginary part (ε″) of complex permittivity ε* (ε* = ε′ − ″) measured as a function of frequency (10−2 Hz to 107 Hz) at different temperatures (113 K ≤ T ≤ 433 K) are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. When interpreting these data, we should consider conductivity being contributed by both the electronic and ionic parts. At lower frequencies, an increase in the dielectric constant with decreasing frequency is typical for electrode polarization due to the presence of mobile ions. In lower frequency regions, different values of slopes in ε″ vs. f curves imply ion transport if slope~ −1, whereas slope > −1 means the polarization effect. The decreasing value of slope at a higher frequency represents the caged movement of ions, i.e., ion–ion interactions and short time regime correlations [56]. The Maxwell–Wagner model can be utilized to understand the dielectric response of these materials [57]. These polarizations are also temperature-dependent, as shown in Figure 7. As the temperature increases, ion dissociation takes place, which ultimately results in an increase in dielectric polarization. Moreover, interfacial polarization also occurs because of the buildup of charges at the grain boundaries. At a lower temperature, dissociated ions are not available, and a small value of permittivity is assigned to polarons dominant in PPDA, which are almost in frozen condition. With the gradual increase in temperature, these polarons inside grains separated by grain boundaries result in the Maxwell–Wagner effect at lower frequencies. In the case of PPDA-5, the value of ε′ and ε″ is small due to the smaller content of MMT, which is directly proportional to water content since water molecules are captured in between MMT layers and form ionic dipoles [57]. This is also evidenced in Figure 6c,d, where the ε′ value decreases after exceeding 353 K since water starts to evaporate [58]. The variation in the dissipation factor (tan δ = ε″/ε′) with temperature at different frequencies decreases with increasing frequency at all temperatures, which is in a good agreement with Koop’s phenomenological model [59]. The composites PPDA-35 and PPDA-50 attain a low value of tan δ, which is due to the partial exfoliation of the MMT gallery as evidenced by XRD.
To better discuss relaxation processes of the impedance spectra and suppress the electrode polarization effects, the complex dielectric modulus was obtained from the real and imaginary part of the permittivity.
M = 1 ε = 1 ( ε j ε ) = M + j M = ε ( ε ) 2 + ( ε ) 2 + j ε ( ε ) 2 + ( ε ) 2
where M′ and M″ are the real part and imaginary part of the complex dielectric modulus (M*), respectively [60]. Figure 8 shows the frequency dependence of the imaginary part of the modulus at different temperatures. In fact, the low frequency peak corresponds to the long-range migration of ions, whereas the high frequency peak represents spatially confined ions within potential wells and localized short distance motion within the domains [56].
The values of relaxation time τ = 1 w m a x corresponding to the frequency of the low-frequency maximum fmax of the M″ frequency spectrum are plotted in Figure 9 as a function of temperature. This follows an Arrhenius law with the activation energy Ea being 0.56, 0.69, 0.44 and 0.53 eV for pristine poly(p-phenylenediamine), PPDA-5, PPDA-35 and PPDA-50, respectively.
The frequency dependences of the real part of conductivity at different temperatures are shown in Figure 10 for the polymer and composites and Figure 11 for montmorillonite. The real part of the conductivity obeys a power law known as Jonscher’s law given by Equation (2) within the considered frequency and temperature ranges:
σ = σ d c + A w s
where σdc is the DC conductivity obtained by extrapolating σ′ to the low frequency limit. The term Aws is the dispersive component of AC conductivity, which represents the degree of interaction between mobile ions and the lattices. Here, A is the pre-exponential factor describing the strength of the polarizability, and s, which is a power law exponent, within 0 < s < 1, is a measure of the correlation degree. The behavior of s on temperature provides an insight into the conduction mechanism. The power law dependences point to inhomogeneity in the composites and that the ion transport plays the crucial role. At room temperature and lower frequencies, the composites PPDA-35 and PPDA-50 show a higher value of conductivity than pristine materials. The same is observed in the case of DC conductivity measured with the four-probe van der Pauw method (Table 1). This increase in conductivity is related to the intercalation of PPDA chains between the layers of MMT, which leads to higher ordering in polymer chains causing more a compact structure compared to pristine PPDA. The higher DC conductivity values obtained from the DC four-probe method compared to impedance spectroscopy can be explained by the elimination of the contact resistance in the former case. Figure 12 shows the Arrhenius plots of σdc against 1/T for all the samples according to Equation (3):
σ d c = σ 0   exp   ( E d c k B T )
The calculated values of activation energy (Edc) are listed in Table 1. It is seen that different activation energies exist at high and low temperatures, which indicates the dissociation of ions with an increase in temperature, hence increasing the conductivity at high temperatures, but at a low temperature, the ions do not have enough energy to hop to neighboring sites and remain caged. For the sample PPDA-35 and PPDA-50, the change in the slope of the curve occurs at 200 K, which is attributed to the motion of the water–polymer complex in the amorphous region [61], whereas for pristine PPDA and PPDA-5 it is at 273 K, revealing the existence of phase transition that might be associated with alternation in local structures. The lowest activation energy is found for the sample PPDA-35, which means less energy is required to migrate the ions from the binding coordinating site to another site. The decrease in conductivity for PPDA-35 and PPDA-50 above 353 K is again associated with the evaporation of intercalated water. For the low temperature region where the mobile charge carriers are mainly polarons but not ions, the activation energies are sufficiently low and following the opposite trend compared to that in the higher temperature region. Pristine PPDA has the lowest and the composites with more MMT content have higher values of activation energy since the movements of polarons inherited in the polymer are hindered with the addition of MMT, and DC conductivity is thus not only a function of temperature as expressed by the Arrhenius equation [62]. Additionally, pristine PPDA shows intermediate activation energy, which is attributed to the contribution of polymer segmental motion.
From Figure 12, it is clearly seen that two different activation energies exist at different temperature regions. This suggests that two conduction mechanisms prevail, one at lower temperature (polaronic) and another at high temperature (ionic). The temperature dependences of s values obtained from the linear fit of the σac frequency dependencies at the linear region are plotted in Figure 13 for the lower temperature region. To study the conduction mechanism at lower temperatures, various models have been proposed in the literature to explain the predominant conduction mechanisms according to the shape of the temperature dependence of exponent s. For the case of s increasing with increasing temperature, a small polaron conduction mechanism has been suggested, whereas if s decreases with increasing temperature then the mechanism is called correlated barrier hopping. If s is independent with temperature, then quantum mechanical tunneling is expected [63]. In our case, the exponent s decreases as the temperature increases, which is attributed to correlated barrier hopping (CBH) of polarons. The frequency dependence according to the CBH model can be expressed by Equation (2), with s given by Equation (4) [64].
s = 1 6 k B T [ W M k B T l n ( 1 ω τ 0 ) ]
where WM is the polaron binding energy, τ0 is the characteristic relaxation time and kB is the Boltzmann’s constant. For large WM/KBT, Equation (4) can be deduced as:
W M = 6 k B T 1 s
The values of WM calculated at the low temperature region are shown in the inset of Figure 13 using the experimental values of s. The values obtained indicate that single polarons are the major charge carriers but not bipolarons since for bipolaronic transport values of WM must be almost four times higher [64]. It is seen that at the lowest measured temperature, these single polarons have a higher binding energy for pristine PPDA and PPDA-5 than in the composites PPDA-35 and PPDA-50, but after the gradual increase in temperature similar values are attained.
As seen in Figure 11, the dependence of the real part of conductivity shows the plateau that allows the determination of DC conductivity of ~10−6 S/cm, which is in a good agreement with values reported in the literature [32,33]. The conductivity decreases above 353 K due to the evaporation of intercalated water. This is similar to the behavior described above for the composites with a higher content of MMT. The conductivity decreases drastically after heating to 433 K, referring to the humidity dependence of montmorillonite and ions playing a dominant role in the conduction mechanism [65,66].

4. Conclusions

PPDA/MMT composites were successfully synthesized by a two-step procedure, viz., the intercalation of monomers, followed by oxidative polymerization. Even though, contrary to the initial expectations, the introduction of various amounts of MMT into the polymerization mixture led to similar amounts of the MMT in obtained composites, the variation in the initial monomer-to-MMT ratio allowed us to obtain series of composites with diverse conductivity. Spectroscopy characterization revealed that such composites differ in the polymeric or oligomeric nature of the organic part. Both AC and DC conductivities of composites were found to be higher than the corresponding polymer. Impedance spectroscopy studied over a wide range of frequency and temperature points to the change in the conduction mechanism from polaronic conduction arising from the polymer in low temperatures to ionic conduction in higher temperatures inherited in MMT. Such composites can be applied as anticorrosion coatings, sensors, electromagnetic shielding or in electrorheology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.A., P.B. and J.P.; methodology, U.A. and J.P.; formal analysis, U.A. and M.A.T.; investigation, U.A., Z.M. and M.K.; resources, P.B. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, U.A.; writing—review and editing, U.A., P.B. and J.P.; visualization, U.A. and M.A.T.; supervision, J.P.; funding acquisition, P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors wish to thank the Czech Science Foundation (21-01401S) for the financial support.

Data Availability Statement

We have no depository of publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study. Data are available on request; please contact authors on their e-mail addresses.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Wei Lyu and Markéta Karbusická for sample preparation and TGA measurement, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faustini, M.; Nicole, L.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Sanchez, C. History of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Materials: Prehistory, Art, Science, and Advanced Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kenane, A.; Galca, A.-C.; Matei, E.; Yahiaoui, A.; Hachemaoui, A.; Benkouider, A.M.; Bartha, C.; Istrate, M.C.; Galatanu, M.; Rasoga, O.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Conducting Aniline and O-Anisidine Nanocomposites Based on Montmorillonite Modified Clay. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 184, 105395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, S.; Fan, Z. Encapsulation Methods of Sulfur Particles for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: A Review. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 34, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Leng, D.; Li, W.; Qie, L.; Dong, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Fan, Z. Recent Progress in Developing Li2S Cathodes for Li–S Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 27, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, S.; Fan, Z. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Mesh from Pyrolysis of Cotton in Ammonia as Binder-Free Electrodes of Supercapacitors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 274, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hosseini, M.G.; Raghibi-Boroujeni, M.; Ahadzadeh, I.; Najjar, R.; Seyed Dorraji, M.S. Effect of Polypyrrole–Montmorillonite Nanocomposites Powder Addition on Corrosion Performance of Epoxy Coatings on Al 5000. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 66, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oraon, R.; De Adhikari, A.; Tiwari, S.K.; Nayak, G.C. Enhanced Specific Capacitance of Self-Assembled Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube/Layered Silicate/Polyaniline Hybrid Sandwiched Nanocomposite for Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1392–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bober, P.; Stejskal, J.; Špírková, M.; Trchová, M.; Varga, M.; Prokeš, J. Conducting Polyaniline–Montmorillonite Composites. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 2596–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De León-Almazán, C.M.; Estrada-Moreno, I.A.; Olmedo-Martínez, J.L.; Rivera-Armenta, J.L. Semiconducting Elastomers Based on Polyaniline/Clay Nanocomposites and SEBS Obtained by an Alternative Processing Technique. Synth. Met. 2020, 268, 116460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kazim, S.; Ahmad, S.; Pfleger, J.; Plestil, J.; Joshi, Y.M. Polyaniline–Sodium Montmorillonite Clay Nanocomposites: Effect of Clay Concentration on Thermal, Structural, and Electrical Properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Contri, G.; Barra, G.M.O.; Ramoa, S.D.A.S.; Merlini, C.; Ecco, L.G.; Souza, F.S.; Spinelli, A. Epoxy Coating Based on Montmorillonite-Polypyrrole: Electrical Properties and Prospective Application on Corrosion Protection of Steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 114, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vilímová, P.; Kulhánková, L.; Peikertová, P.; Mamulová Kutláková, K.; Vallová, S.; Koníčková, H.; Plaček, T.; Tokarský, J. Effect of Montmorillonite/Polypyrrole Ratio and Oxidizing Agent on Structure and Electrical Conductivity of Intercalated Nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aradilla, D.; Estrany, F.; Azambuja, D.S.; Casas, M.T.; Puiggali, J.; Ferreira, C.A.; Alemán, C. Conducting Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene)-Montmorillonite Exfoliated Nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Do Nascimento, G.M.; Sestrem, R.H.; Temperini, M.L.A. Structural Characterization of Poly-Para-Phenylenediamine–Montmorillonite Clay Nanocomposites. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 2397–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramya, E.; Rajashree, C.; Nayak, P.L.; Narayana Rao, D. New Hybrid Organic Polymer Montmorillonite/Chitosan/Polyphenylenediamine Composites for Nonlinear Optical Studies. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 150, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajapakse, R.M.G.; Murakami, K.; Bandara, H.M.N.; Rajapakse, R.M.M.Y.; Velauthamurti, K.; Wijeratne, S. Preparation and Characterization of Electronically Conducting Polypyrrole-Montmorillonite Nanocomposite and Its Potential Application as a Cathode Material for Oxygen Reduction. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 2490–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. de Barros, A.; Constantino, C.J.L.; da Cruz, N.C.; Bortoleto, J.R.R.; Ferreira, M. High Performance of Electrochemical Sensors Based on LbL Films of Gold Nanoparticles, Polyaniline and Sodium Montmorillonite Clay Mineral for Simultaneous Detection of Metal Ions. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 235, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zheng, H.; Liu, M.; Yan, Z.; Chen, J. Highly Selective and Stable Glucose Biosensor Based on Incorporation of Platinum Nanoparticles into Polyaniline-Montmorillonite Hybrid Composites. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Špírková, M.; Bober, P.; Kotek, J.; Stejskal, J. Bi-Hybrid Coatings: Polyaniline-Montmorillonite Filler in Organic-Inorganic Polymer Matrix. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 1020–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ben Ali, M.; Wang, F.; Boukherroub, R.; Lei, W.; Xia, M. Phytic Acid-Doped Polyaniline Nanofibers-Clay Mineral for Efficient Adsorption of Copper (II) Ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 553, 688–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pham, Q.L.; Haldorai, Y.; Nguyen, V.H.; Tuma, D.; Shim, J.-J. Facile Synthesis of Poly(p-Phenylenediamine)/MWCNT Nanocomposites and Characterization for Investigation of Structural Effects of Carbon Nanotubes. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lakouraj, M.M.; Zare, E.N.; Moghadam, P.N. Synthesis of Novel Conductive Poly(p-Phenylenediamine)/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite via Emulsion Polymerization and Investigation of Antioxidant Activity. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2014, 33, 21385:1–21385:7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Magdziarz, P.; Bober, P.; Trchová, M.; Morávková, Z.; Bláha, M.; Prokeš, J.; Stejskal, J. Conducting Composites Prepared by the Reduction of Silver Ions with Poly(p-Phenylenediamine). Polym. Int. 2015, 64, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Minisy, I.M.; Zasońska, B.A.; Petrovský, E.; Veverka, P.; Šeděnková, I.; Hromádková, J.; Bober, P. Poly(p-Phenylenediamine)/Maghemite Composite as Highly Effective Adsorbent for Anionic Dye Removal. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 146, 104436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, T.C.; Yuan, S.; Liang, B. N-Doped Porous Carbon Derived from RGO-Incorporated Polyphenylenediamine Composites for CO2 Adsorption and Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2020, 472, 228610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stejskal, J. Polymers of Phenylenediamines. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 41, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bláha, M.; Trchová, M.; Morávková, Z.; Humpolíček, P.; Stejskal, J. Semiconducting Materials from Oxidative Coupling of Phenylenediamines under Various Acidic Conditions. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 205, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khelifa, I.; Belmokhtar, A.; Berenguer, R.; Benyoucef, A.; Morallon, E. New Poly(o-Phenylenediamine)/Modified-Clay Nanocomposites: A Study on Spectral, Thermal, Morphological and Electrochemical Characteristics. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1178, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nath, A.K.; Kumar, A. Scaling of AC Conductivity, Electrochemical and Thermal Properties of Ionic Liquid Based Polymer Nanocomposite Electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 129, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, Y.Z.; Kim, H.M.; Choi, H.J. Conducting polymer-based electro-responsive smart suspensions. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 5009–5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ates, M. A Review on Conducting Polymer Coatings for Corrosion Protection. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 1510–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Slade, R.C.T.; Barker, J.; Hirst, P.R.; Halstead, T.K.; Reid, P.I. Conduction and Diffusion in Exchanged Montmorillonite Clays. Solid State Ion. 1987, 24, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nj, G.; Jc, B. Conductivity in Na+-Montmorillonite and Li+-Montmorillonite as a Function of Equilibration Humidity. Solid State Ion. 1996, 92, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu, L.; Cao, S.; Lv, G. Influence of Energy State of Montmorillonite Interlayer Cations on Organic Intercalation. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 3489720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Krupskaya, V.V.; Zakusin, S.V.; Tyupina, E.A.; Dorzhieva, O.V.; Zhukhlistov, A.P.; Belousov, P.E.; Timofeeva, M.N. Experimental Study of Montmorillonite Structure and Transformation of Its Properties under Treatment with Inorganic Acid Solutions. Minerals 2017, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hayati-Ashtiani, M. Use of FTIR Spectroscopy in the Characterization of Natural and Treated Nanostructured Bentonites (Montmorillonites). Part. Sci. Technol. 2012, 30, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Becker, E.D. Raman Spectra of Isotopic Derivatives of p-Benzoquinone: Revised Vibrational Assignments. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2818–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stammreich, H.; Sans, T.T. Molecular Vibrations of Quinones. IV. Raman Spectra of P-Benzoquinone and Its Centrosymmetrically Substituted Isotopic Derivatives and Assignment of Observed Frequencies. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 42, 920–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bláha, M.; Marek, F.; Morávková, Z.; Svoboda, J.; Brus, J.; Dybal, J.; Prokeš, J.; Varga, M.; Stejskal, J. Role of P-Benzoquinone in the Synthesis of a Conducting Polymer, Polyaniline. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 7128–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Trchová, M.; Morávková, Z.; Šeděnková, I.; Stejskal, J. Spectroscopy of Thin Polyaniline Films Deposited during Chemical Oxidation of Aniline. Chem. Pap. 2012, 66, 415–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. do Nascimento, G.M.; Constantino, V.R.L.; Landers, R.; Temperini, M.L.A. Spectroscopic Characterization of Polyaniline Formed in the Presence of Montmorillonite Clay. Polymer 2006, 47, 6131–6139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baibarac, M.; Baltog, I.; Scocioreanu, M.; Ballesteros, B.; Mevellec, J.Y.; Lefrant, S. One-Dimensional Composites Based on Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Poly(o-Phenylenediamine). Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 2344–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sestrem, R.H.; Ferreira, D.C.; Landers, R.; Temperini, M.L.A.; do Nascimento, G.M. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Polymer and Oligomers of Ortho-Phenylenediamine. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brolo, A.G.; Sanderson, A.C. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) from a Silver Electrode Modified with Oxazine 720. Can. J. Chem. 2011, 82, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trchová, M.; Morávková, Z.; Dybal, J.; Stejskal, J. Detection of Aniline Oligomers on Polyaniline–Gold Interface Using Resonance Raman Scattering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Anto, P.L.; Panicker, C.Y.; Varghese, H.T.; Philip, D. Potential-Dependent SERS Profile of Orthanilic Acid on Silver Electrode. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Santana, H.; Quillard, S.; Fayad, E.; Louarn, G. In Situ UV–Vis and Raman Spectroscopic Studies of the Electrochemical Behavior of N,N′-Diphenyl-1,4-Phenylenediamine. Synth. Met. 2006, 156, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boyer, M.I.; Quillard, S.; Louarn, G.; Froyer, G.; Lefrant, S. Vibrational Study of the FeCl3-Doped Dimer of Polyaniline; A Good Model Compound of Emeraldine Salt. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 8952–8961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cochet, M.; Louarn, G.; Quillard, S.; Boyer, M.I.; Buisson, J.P.; Lefrant, S. Theoretical and Experimental Vibrational Study of Polyaniline in Base Forms: Non-Planar Analysis. Part I. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cochet, M.; Louarn, G.; Quillard, S.; Buisson, J.P.; Lefrant, S. Theoretical and Experimental Vibrational Study of Emeraldine in Salt Form. Part II. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Quillard, S.; Louam, G.; Buisson, J.P.; Boyer, M.; Lapkowski, M.; Pron, A.; Lefrant, S. Vibrational Spectroscopic Studies of the Isotope Effects in Polyaniline. Synth. Met. 1997, 84, 805–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Louarn, G.; Lapkowski, M.; Quillard, S.; Pron, A.; Buisson, J.P.; Lefrant, S. Vibrational Properties of PolyanilineIsotope Effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 6998–7006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. do Nascimento, G.M.; Kobata, P.Y.G.; Millen, R.P.; Temperini, M.L.A. Raman Dispersion in Polyaniline Base Forms. Synth. Met. 2007, 157, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Do Nascimento, G.M.; Constantino, V.R.L.; Landers, R.; Temperini, M.L.A. Aniline Polymerization into Montmorillonite Clay:  A Spectroscopic Investigation of the Intercalated Conducting Polymer. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 9373–9385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Morávková, Z.; Dmitrieva, E. The First Products of Aniline Oxidation—SERS Spectroelectrochemistry. Chem. Sel. 2019, 4, 8847–8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kumar, M.; Tiwari, T.; Chauhan, J.K.; Srivastava, N. Understanding the Ion Dynamics and Relaxation Behavior from Impedance Spectroscopy of NaI Doped Zwitterionic Polymer System. Mater. Res. Express 2014, 1, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Soltane, L.; Sediri, F. Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization and Electrical Investigation of Poly(Para-Phenylenediamine)/Vanadium Oxide Nanocomposite Nanosheets. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2013, 178, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ali, A.; Mohamed, N.S.; Sani, N.A.M.; Abdullah, M.A.A. Preparation and Properties of Alkylphosphonium Modified Montmorillonites. Int. J. Appl. Chem. 2016, 12, 6. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chand, J.; Kumar, G.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, S.K.; Knobel, M.; Singh, M. Effect of Gd3+ Doping on Magnetic, Electric and Dielectric Properties of MgGdxFe2−xO4 Ferrites Processed by Solid State Reaction Technique. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 9638–9644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lvovich, V.F. Impedance Spectroscopy: Applications to Electrochemical and Dielectric Phenomena, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  61. Einfeldt, J.; Meißner, D.; Kwasniewski, A. Polymerdynamics of Cellulose and Other Polysaccharides in Solid State-Secondary Dielectric Relaxation Processes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1419–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aziz, S.B.; Abidin, Z.H.Z. Electrical Conduction Mechanism in Solid Polymer Electrolytes: New Concepts to Arrhenius Equation. J. Soft Matter. 2013, 2013, 323868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Megdiche, M.; Perrin-pellegrino, C.; Gargouri, M. Conduction Mechanism Study by Overlapping Large-Polaron Tunnelling Model in SrNiP2O7 Ceramic Compound. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 584, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Elliott, S.R. A.c. Conduction in Amorphous Chalcogenide and Pnictide Semiconductors. Adv. Phys. 1987, 36, 135–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Salles, F.; Devautour-Vinot, S.; Bildstein, O.; Jullien, M.; Maurin, G.; Giuntini, J.-C.; Douillard, J.-M.; Van Damme, H. Ionic Mobility and Hydration Energies in Montmorillonite Clay. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 14001–14009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Su, P.-G.; Chen, C.-Y. Humidity Sensing and Electrical Properties of Na- and K-Montmorillonite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 129, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of PPDA/MMT composites.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of PPDA/MMT composites.
Polymers 13 03132 sch001
Figure 1. TGA curves of pristine MMT, PPDA and their composites.
Figure 1. TGA curves of pristine MMT, PPDA and their composites.
Polymers 13 03132 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of pristine (a) MMT and (b) PPDA, and their composites prepared with various amounts of MMT: (c) PPDA-5 and (d) PPDA-50.
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of pristine (a) MMT and (b) PPDA, and their composites prepared with various amounts of MMT: (c) PPDA-5 and (d) PPDA-50.
Polymers 13 03132 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of pristine MMT, PPDA and their composites.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of pristine MMT, PPDA and their composites.
Polymers 13 03132 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of selected MMT, PPDA and their composites. The spectra were baseline corrected, normalized and shifted for clarity.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of selected MMT, PPDA and their composites. The spectra were baseline corrected, normalized and shifted for clarity.
Polymers 13 03132 g004
Figure 5. Raman spectra of selected MMT, PPDA and their composites excited with the 514 nm laser line. The spectra were baseline corrected, normalized and shifted for clarity.
Figure 5. Raman spectra of selected MMT, PPDA and their composites excited with the 514 nm laser line. The spectra were baseline corrected, normalized and shifted for clarity.
Polymers 13 03132 g005
Figure 6. Variations in real part of permittivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Figure 6. Variations in real part of permittivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Polymers 13 03132 g006
Figure 7. Variations in imaginary part of permittivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Figure 7. Variations in imaginary part of permittivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Polymers 13 03132 g007aPolymers 13 03132 g007b
Figure 8. Variations in imaginary part of modulus with frequency with temperature for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Figure 8. Variations in imaginary part of modulus with frequency with temperature for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Polymers 13 03132 g008aPolymers 13 03132 g008b
Figure 9. Plot of relaxation time vs. reciprocal temperature for PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites.
Figure 9. Plot of relaxation time vs. reciprocal temperature for PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites.
Polymers 13 03132 g009
Figure 10. Variations in real part of AC conductivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Figure 10. Variations in real part of AC conductivity with frequency at different temperatures for (a) PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites: (b) PPDA-5, (c) PPDA-35 and (d) PPDA-50.
Polymers 13 03132 g010
Figure 11. Variations in real part of AC conductivity with frequency at different temperatures for the pure montmorillonite. Inset shows the variation in conductivity at 293 K before and after heating to 433 K.
Figure 11. Variations in real part of AC conductivity with frequency at different temperatures for the pure montmorillonite. Inset shows the variation in conductivity at 293 K before and after heating to 433 K.
Polymers 13 03132 g011
Figure 12. Variation in DC conductivity with reciprocal temperature. The solid lines represent fitting according to Arrhenius equation.
Figure 12. Variation in DC conductivity with reciprocal temperature. The solid lines represent fitting according to Arrhenius equation.
Polymers 13 03132 g012
Figure 13. Variation in exponent parameter s with temperature for PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites. The solid lines are drawn for clarity. Inset shows the variation in WM with temperature.
Figure 13. Variation in exponent parameter s with temperature for PPDA and PPDA/MMT composites. The solid lines are drawn for clarity. Inset shows the variation in WM with temperature.
Polymers 13 03132 g013
Table 1. The montmorillonite content and DC conductivity of PPDA/MMT composites.
Table 1. The montmorillonite content and DC conductivity of PPDA/MMT composites.
Sample CodePDA Content in Polymerization Mixture,
wt%
MMT Content in Polymerization Mixture, wt%PPDA Content in Composites,
wt%
MMT Content
in Composites, wt%
Conductivity,
S cm−1
(Measured by Van der Pauw Method)
Activation Energy (Ea) (eV)
Evaluated from M″ vs. fEvaluated from DC Conductivity vs. 1/T
High Temperature RegionLow Temperature Region
PPDA100010007 × 10−110.570.640.02
PPDA-2643619813 × 10−11---
PPDA-5425818821 × 10−110.690.580.05
PPDA-1026748922.5 × 10−8---
PPDA-1519818923.4 × 10−8---
PPDA-2513877932.2 × 10−7---
PPDA-359916941 × 10−60.440.340.06
PPDA-507937939.2 × 10−70.540.420.12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acharya, U.; Bober, P.; Thottappali, M.A.; Morávková, Z.; Konefał, M.; Pfleger, J. Synthesis and Impedance Spectroscopy of Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/Montmorillonite Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183132

AMA Style

Acharya U, Bober P, Thottappali MA, Morávková Z, Konefał M, Pfleger J. Synthesis and Impedance Spectroscopy of Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/Montmorillonite Composites. Polymers. 2021; 13(18):3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acharya, Udit, Patrycja Bober, Muhammed Arshad Thottappali, Zuzana Morávková, Magdalena Konefał, and Jiří Pfleger. 2021. "Synthesis and Impedance Spectroscopy of Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/Montmorillonite Composites" Polymers 13, no. 18: 3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop