Next Article in Journal
Role of Alcohol Drinking in Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
A Mild Method for Preparation of Highly Selective Magnetic Biochar Microspheres
Previous Article in Journal
miR-216a Acts as a Negative Regulator of Breast Cancer by Modulating Stemness Properties and Tumor Microenvironment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solvent Dependence of the Rheological Properties in Hydrogel Magnetorheological Plastomer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement of Biomimetic Enzymatic Mineralization of Gellan Gum Polysaccharide Hydrogels by Plant-Derived Gallotannins

1
Nano-Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Engineering Department., Lancaster University, Gillow Avenue, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
3
Materials Science Institute (MSI), Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
4
Division of Food Technology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
5
Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University & Research AFSG, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
6
Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 00 Prague, Czech Republic
7
Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Charles University in Prague, 116 36 Prague, Czech Republic
8
Department of Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, D-53012 Bonn, Germany
9
FSRC “Crystallography and photonics” RAS, 119333 Moscow, Russia
10
Institute of Nanostructures and Biosystems, Saratov NG Chernyshevskii State Univ, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia
11
Omnichem NV, 9230 Wetterem, Belgium
12
Department of Chemistry, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
13
Centre for Nano- and Biophotonics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(7), 2315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072315
Submission received: 30 December 2019 / Revised: 17 March 2020 / Accepted: 21 March 2020 / Published: 27 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Composite Materials)

Abstract

:
Mineralization of hydrogel biomaterials with calcium phosphate (CaP) is considered advantageous for bone regeneration. Mineralization can be both induced by the enzyme alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and promoted by calcium-binding biomolecules, such as plant-derived polyphenols. In this study, ALP-loaded gellan gum (GG) hydrogels were enriched with gallotannins, a subclass of polyphenols. Five preparations were compared, namely three tannic acids of differing molecular weight (MW), pentagalloyl glucose (PGG), and a gallotannin-rich extract from mango kernel (Mangifera indica L.). Certain gallotannin preparations promoted mineralization to a greater degree than others. The various gallotannin preparations bound differently to ALP and influenced the size of aggregates of ALP, which may be related to ability to promote mineralization. Human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells grew in eluate from mineralized hydrogels. Gallotannin incorporation impeded cell growth on hydrogels and did not impart antibacterial activity. In conclusion, gallotannin incorporation aided mineralization but reduced cytocompatibility.

1. Introduction

To adapt hydrogels for applications in bone regeneration, they are enriched with a mineral phase, most commonly a form of calcium phosphate (CaP) (for a review, see [1]). One biomimetic mineralization method is the incorporation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), the enzyme responsible for mineralization of bone tissue, followed by incubation in a mineralization solution of calcium glycerophosphate (CaGP). For example, ALP-mediated mineralization of gellan gum (GG) hydrogels with CaP reinforced the hydrogel mechanically and promoted the adhesion and growth of bone-forming cells, which is a pre-requisite for new bone formation [2].
Hence, modifications of a hydrogel to increase its mineralizability are desirable. An advantage of using hydrogels is the ease of incorporation of water-soluble biomolecules inside the hydrogel polymer network. Strategies to increase mineralizability include the incorporation of calcium-binding biomolecules [2,3] or phosphate-binding biomolecules [1,4]. The result is an increase in the intrahydrogel concentrations of calcium and phosphate ions, which in turn promotes CaP precipitation. It can be noted that ALP itself has been shown to increase the local inorganic phosphate concentration [5], but its combination with CaP results in the formation of hybrid organic–inorganic materials [6] reported to promote cell growth.
The mineralization of synthetic and natural hydrogels has been studied [7,8,9,10,11]. Synthetic hydrogels generally have better defined chemical structures, but often lack the functional groups with natural affinity for calcium (or phosphate) ions shown by natural polymers, such as alginate and GG. For the mineralization, various biomolecules have been used, including polyphenols, which have been successfully used for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis due to their protective effects on the bone mineral density [12,13]. In addition, polyphenols promoted biological mineralization of Ti6Al4V alloy by deposition of hydroxyapatite by mesenchymal stem cells cultured on this implant material, which is currently used in clinical practice [14]. In our earlier studies, polyphenols promoted mineralization of chitosan and gellan gum hydrogels (i.e., other materials that are promising for bone tissue engineering [15,16]. In this regard, polyphenols—plant-derived biomolecules present in plant cell walls [17]—are good candidates. It should be noted that certain polyphenols are known to display affinities for divalent metal ions, such as calcium [16]. One class of polyphenols known to bind calcium ions are the gallotannins [18]. Gallotannins consist of a glucose core esterified with gallic acid. The number of gallic acid units can range from one to more than ten [19]. Gallotannins are commonly extracted from plant seeds, such as mango kernels [20]. Typical gallotannins include decagalloyl glucose, more commonly known as tannic acid, and pentagalloyl glucose (PGG). Tannic acid is a well-known crosslinker in the leather industry through non-covalent interactions with collagen molecules. Tannic acid and PGG have been used to crosslink protein-based biomaterials [21,22].
The ability of gallotannins to promote hydrogel mineralization remains rather unexplored. Phlorotannins, another type of tannins derived from brown algae, have been reported to enhance osteogenic differentiation of mouse MC3T3E1 preosteoblasts, including a higher calcium concentration in these cells [23]. In our earlier study, Seanol(®), a seaweed extract rich in phlorotannins, induced mineralization of GG with CaP [16]. On the other hand, procyanidins (i.e., condensed tannins) prevented the calcification of elastin scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering, which was (besides other reasons) explained by direct blocking of the mineral nucleation sites in elastin fibers by procyanidins [24].
A further beneficial property of polyphenols is their antibacterial activity [25]. Due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, endowing biomaterials for implantation with antibacterial properties is desirable. Since gallotannins have shown antibacterial activity [14,26], they are expected to be promising antibacterial materials.
In this study, ALP-loaded GG hydrogels were enriched with gallotannins in order to enhance their mineralization. Five gallotanin preparations were used. We compared three tannic acids of differing molecular weight (MW) and PGG content with the brand names ALSOK2, ALSOK4 and Brewtan F (BTF) (see Section 3.1), along with PGG and a gallotannin-rich extract from mango kernel (Mangifera indica L.), which is known to contain a mixture of different gallotannins. As mentioned above, the incorporation of seaweed-derived polyphenols (phlorotannins) promoted hydrogel mineralization and endowed antibacterial activity in our previous work [16].
The ability of gallotannins to promote hydrogel mineralization was evaluated by calculating the dry mass percentage (i.e., the mass percentage of mineralized hydrogels attributable to newly formed minerals and polymers and not water). This served as a measure of mineral formation. In addition, amounts of elemental Ca and P in hydrogels as a result of mineralization were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Further physicochemical characterization of formed CaP mineral included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
To evaluate electrostatic effects between protein and gallotannins and the addition of CaCl2, zeta-potential analyses were conducted in three interaction media (Table 1), namely water, CaCl2 solution, and GG/CaCl2 solution. To further explore the cross-linking ability of gallotannins with ALP, their interaction was followed by fluorescence analysis, and the aggregation potential of these molecules was observed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) in an interaction medium containing GG and CaCl2 (Table 2).
In addition, mineralized hydrogels were characterized by means of cell biology assays using human Saos-2 osteoblast-like cells. Growth of cells in eluates from mineralized hydrogels was analyzed using a real-time cell analyzer. Direct cell growth on mineralized hydrogels was evaluated using the standard 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) assay. Microbiological assays using Escheria coli (E. coli) were conducted by incubating mineralized hydrogels in bacterial suspensions followed by cultivation of the suspensions on agar to assess bacterial growth.
It was hypothesized that gallotannins would enhance hydrogel mineralization and endow antibacterial properties to mineralized hydrogels. It was also hypothesized that different gallotannins would interact differently with ALP.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Materials

SEM images of mineralized hydrogels (Figure 1A–E) demonstrated the presence of inorganic deposits, which strongly suggested that mineral formation had taken place. Calculation of dry mass percentage (Figure 1F) demonstrated that values were clearly higher in the presence of the enzyme ALP. All gallotannin preparations increased dry mass percentage values, indicating that the presence of gallotannin promoted the mineral formation. Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) measurements of elemental Ca and P in mineralized hydrogels (Figure 1G) largely confirmed the results of dry mass percentage measurements and the presence of mineral deposits suggested by SEM results. Differences were observed between sample groups. Mango extract, PGG, and Brewtan were the most successful at promoting mineralization, whereas ALSOK2, and in particular ALSOK4, promoted mineralization to a markedly lower extent.
XRD spectra (Figure 2A) demonstrated the presence of both calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) and amorphous CaP. Peaks characteristic for hydroxyapatite were observed at 2θ values of 26 and 32. Clearly, the mineral formed was not highly crystalline. In the case of samples containing mango extract, the CaP formed was markedly less crystalline. The reasons for this remain unclear. FTIR (Figure 2B) demonstrated the presence of CDHA in all samples.

2.2. Interactions between ALP and Gallotannins

The interactions between ALP and gallotannins were analyzed in the three different environments (Table 1) and in the concentrations used for the hydrogels. Non-covalent interactions between gallotannins and ALP were followed by fluorescence quenching analysis (Figure 3 and Figure 4), while protein cross-linking was also assessed by size changes via DLS and electrostatic complexes were evaluated using zeta potential measurements before and after ligand addition (Table 2).
The fluorescence intensity of the aromatic amino acid tryptophan (Trp) in ALP was followed at 294 nm excitation to avoid a strong overlap with tyrosine (excitation maximum at 280 nm).
The Trp fluorescence of the ALP was significantly quenched after the addition of gallotannins, which hints at non-covalent interactions (Figure 3). The corresponding fluorescence emission maximum of ALP in water (interaction solution A) was continuously red-shifted from 340 nm, with rising concentration of gallotannins in the order ALSOK2 > PGG > Brewtan F > ALSOK4 (i.e., maximum shift by 19, 16, 11, and 9 nm, respectively) (Figure 3a). Similarly, for solutions of ALP with CaCl2 (interaction solution B) (Figure 3B) and ALP with CaCl2 and GG (interaction solution C) (Figure 3C), bathochromic shifts were observed, with ALSOK4 always showing the lowest wavelength shift. However, in interaction solution C, whose composition was most similar to that of the hydrogels, as it contained CaCl2 and GG, the red shift was in the order Brewtan F ≈ PGG > ALSOK2 > ALSOK4.
The photophysical properties of Trp are influenced by changes in the polarity of its environment, for example caused by non-covalent interactions [27,28]. A bathochromic shift indicates a more hydrophilic environment and complete denatured proteins show a maximum red shift due to increased solvent accessibility to Trp and the local electrostatic distribution changes [29,30]. Since the ALP-dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) spectra showed neither an emission maximum shift nor fluorescence quenching effect, any influence of DMSO on the protein conformation can be excluded. It is more likely that the shift was caused by hydrogen binding or other non-covalent interactions of the ALP with gallotannins.
The relative quenching of the Trp fluorescence at the 340 nm emission wavelength was further corrected for inner filter effects, which are caused by the increasing addition of the tannins absorbing the excitation and emission wavelength [28]. The gallotannins ALSOK 2 and PGG reacted most strongly with pure ALP in water (Figure A1a), whereas ALSOK 4 and Brewtan F resulted in a less pronounced fluorescence quenching effect. It is evident that the addition of CaCl2 (Figure A1B) increased the fluorescence quenching effect of these two gallotannins. Similarly, the addition of CaCl2 combined with GG (Figure A1) also affected the gallotannin–protein interaction positively, with the exception of ALSOK 2. There was no direct correlation between the bathochromic shift and the fluorescence quenching effect. It can be assumed that the red shift is also dependent on the number of hydroxyl groups and the gallotannin structure itself [27]. It was clear that DMSO had no effect on fluorescence quenching.
The non-covalent interaction of tannins or other polyphenols is a well-known process often followed by fluorescence quenching [31,32]. The binding described effect is primarily driven by hydrophobic attraction of the aromatic polyphenol rings to hydrophobic patches on the protein. In particular, PGG was found to interact by pi-stacking of aromatic groups between proteins and gallotannins [33]. These interactions can be further stabilized by hydrogen bonds to neighboring amino acids or to the protein backbone [34,35,36]. This often results in conformational changes of the protein, activity loss of enzymes, and protein aggregation, depending on the gallotannin/protein ratio. Previous results of the interaction of ALP with phlorotannins found a less strong reaction between the phlorotannins and the ALP [16], although such a comparison is difficult, since the experiments were conducted using similar ALP/polyphenol mass ratios. Differences in molecular weight between the phlorotannins in the aforementioned study and the gallotannins used in the present study were not taken into account. Furthermore, the phlorotannins used in the aforementioned study were more poorly defined (i.e., not all phlototannins could be identified and their relative proportions in the preparation were not determined) and heterogeneous than the gallotannin preparations used in the present study.
The addition of CaGP to all solutions resulted in gelling and precipitation, and therefore it was no longer possible to analyze fluorescence.
To assess electrostatic effects of the addition of CaCl2 and CaGP to ALP and tannin complexes, the zeta potential was analyzed (Figure 4). The zeta potential of ALP in water was approximately −30 mV. The addition of CaCl2 and GG decreased the zeta potential significantly to −20 mV (Figure 4A), probably due to electrostatic effects between positively charged Ca2+ and the negatively charged ALP. Generally, the addition of polyphenols to ALP in water resulted in an increased zeta potential of the complex, which is typically observed for non-covalent interactions between these two substances. This was, however, not observed for Brewtan F (Figure 4a). The addition of CaCl2 always resulted in a significant reduction of the zeta potential, with the exception of Brewtan F. This may be linked to the observation that the addition of CaCl2 increased the interaction between polyphenols and ALP (Figure 3). The reasons remain unclear. One can speculate that cross-linking effects occur, possibly because Ca2+ ions form ionic bridges between polyphenols and ALP. Zeta potential measurements indicated electrostatic interactions between Ca2+ and ALP (Figure 4). Polyphenols have been reported to show affinity for Ca2+ [18]. CaGP had no further significant effect on the charge.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to assess the aggregation effect of the non-covalent complexation. The z-average (intensity based harmonic mean of the particle size distribution) is a reliable measure for changes in particle size distributions, although distributions with a polydispersity index (PDI) > 0.7 are probably too polydisperse for proper analysis.
The z-average of ALP in interaction solution C without DMSO was approximately 82 nm, the addition of 20 µL DMSO had no effect on the z-average, although the addition of 50 µL DMSO increased the ALP diameter to 100 nm (Table 2).
Addition of 50 µL of the different gallotannins to the ALP and CaCl2 solution led to different results. The addition of Brewtan F to ALP resulted in a significant increase of aggregate size up to 207 nm. PGG formed smaller aggregates of approximately 166 nm, whereas ALSOK2 and ALSOK 4 resulted in 148 nm and 91 nm aggregates. Generally, the addition of 50 µL gallotannin solution had a stronger effect on the aggregate size than the smaller volume of 20 µL. ALP in DMSO and ALSOK2 was extremely polydisperse, as indicated by the high PDI values of 0.9 and 0.7, respectively. However, the PDI decreased to 0.5 for ALSOK2 and PGG, and a monodisperse distribution (PDI = 0.1) was evident for Brewtan F.
It is conceivable that the differences in the abilities of the gallotannins to promote mineralization of hydrogels may be linked with interactions between ALP and gallotannins. Mango extract, PGG, and Brewtan F were the most successful at promoting mineralization, while ALSOK2, and in particular ALSOK4, promoted mineralization to a markedly lower extent (Figure 1F,G). Interaction fluorescence quenching studies in interaction solution C, whose composition was closest to that of the hydrogels (the components ALP, CaCl2, and GG were in the same mass ratios as in the hydrogels), showed that PGG and Brewtan exerted the strongest ALP effect, while ALSOK2, and in particular ALSOK4, exerted markedly lower effects (Figure 3). Furthermore, PGG and Brewtan F caused formation of significantly larger ALP aggregates, with a diameter higher by over one order of magnitude (Table 2). Previous work has shown that ALP can diffuse out of GG hydrogels [2]. Larger aggregates of ALP would diffuse out of the hydrogels more slowly, leading to higher intrahydrogel concentrations of ALP and increased mineralization. Zeta potential measurements (Figure 4) showed that calcium makes zeta potential less negative, which would be expected to promote aggregation. No marked differences in zeta potential were observed between interaction solutions containing different gallotannins. Therefore, it can be speculated that the differences in aggregate size detected by DLS (Table 1) are not due to differences in zeta potential, but due to differences in gallotannin–ALP interactions (Figure 3), which might lead to increased protein diameter for PGG and Brewtan. It is not inconceivable that PGG and Brewtan exhibit higher affinities for Ca2+, leading to increased aggregation of gallotannin-Ca2+-ALP.
The mango extract was not subjected to investigation due to the heterogeneity of its composition. It should be kept in mind that interaction solutions A, B, and C were diluted by a factor 10, so caution should be used in interpreting this data.

2.3. Cell Biological Characterization and Antibacterial Testing of Mineralized Hydrogels

The compatibility of mineralized gallotanin-enriched hydrogels with bone cells was evaluated by two approaches: (1) cultivation of human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells in extracts (eluates) of the materials into the cell culture medium and (2) cultivation of Saos-2 cells directly on the materials.
The growth of Saos-2 cells in eluates was evaluated using an xCELLigence system, which enables real-time monitoring of cell growth based on impedance generated by adhering cells.
Cultivation of Saos-2 cells in eluates from mineralized hydrogels after 2 h incubation in cell culture medium (Figure 5A) revealed that samples with no extract and no enzyme displayed cytocompatibility similar to that of the control (cells grown in standard culture medium). Other samples showed poorer cytocompatibility after 150 h, with the exception of samples containing ALSOK2, which showed markedly poorer cytocompatibility from the start of the experiment.
Cultivation of Saos-2 cells in eluates from mineralized hydrogels after 3 d incubation in cell culture medium (Figure 5B) revealed that samples with no enzyme displayed the best cytocompatibility, which was, however, markedly worse than that of the control. Values for samples containing no extract were markedly lower still. All samples containing extracts displayed very poor cytocompatibility.
One explanation for the poor cell growth may be the toxic effect of DMSO [37]. However, in the mentioned study performed on Caco2/TC7 tumor cells, DMSO was used in relatively high concentrations ranging from 30% to 100%, while the 10% DMSO did not cause any cytotoxic effect, as revealed by assays of lactate dehydrogenase release and neutral red uptake. In addition, in 10% concentration, DMSO is currently used as a protective agent for cryopreservation of cells, including Saos-2 cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells, in which it preserved a high viability [38]. On the other hand, DMSO is known as an inhibitor of cell proliferation by arresting the cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, but the cell cycle was completely restored after the DMSO removal [39].
It is possible that release of calcium out of mineralized hydrogels may have killed cells. Calcium ion levels above 10 mM have been reported to be cytotoxic [40]. On the other hand, calcium-containing materials, such as calcium phosphate ceramics, can deplete calcium from the culture medium, which can significantly attenuate the cell proliferation [41,42]. This calcium depletion might also occur in our study, because self-mineralizing materials are logically active in capturing Ca ions from their surrounding environment. The growth of Saos-2 cells directly on the samples was evaluated by a MTS assay of the activity of cell mitochondrial enzymes. The MTS test (Figure 5C) revealed very poor growth on all hydrogel samples at all time points. This finding was unexpected, since previous work has shown that bone-like MC3T3-E1 and MG63 cells are able to adhere to the surfaces of enzymatically mineralized hydrogels [2,16,43].
However, in our previous work, viable MC3T3-E1 and MG-63 cells adhered and grew on enzymatically mineralized hydrogels, without the addition of tannins or other polyphenols. When phlorotannins were added to the hydrogels, these hydrogels became cytotoxic for osteoblast-like MG-63 cells [16]. Therefore, it can be supposed that the poor growth of osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells on our samples enriched with gallotannins or in extract from these samples was caused by cytotoxic effects of gallotannins. It has been also reported that gallotannins induced apoptosis, senescence, cell cycle arrest, and loss of the cell–cell adhesion in several human cell lines derived from colon cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma [44,45,46,47].
An interesting feature of tannins is certain selectivity in their cytotoxicity behavior towards tumor cells and normal cells. For this selectivity, gallic acid (specifically its carboxyl groups) is considered to be responsible [48]. Gallic acid derivatives were found to induce cell death in cancer cell lines but not in primary cultured rat hepatocytes and human keratinocytes [49]. Hydrolyzable tannins showed higher cytotoxic activity against human oral squamous cell carcinoma and salivary gland tumor cell lines than against normal human gingival fibroblasts [50]. Similarly, in our earlier study and our present study, both phlorotannins and gallotannins were cytotocxic towards MG-63 cells [16] and SaOs-2 cells (i.e., cells of osteosarcoma origin), while in a study by Karadeniz et al. [23] phlorotannins increased the growth, viability, and osteogenic cell differentiation in mouse MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, which are not of tumor origin. Thus, our further studies will focus on the effects of gallotannin-enriched hydrogels on primary human osteoblasts and human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. It may be worth considering applications for mineralized composites outside of the biomedical field, where cytocompatibility is less of an issue. For instance, the mineralization of hydrogels could possibly be useful in self-healing applications or environmental engineering applications to remove wastewater from unwanted metal ions, but detailed discussion is outside the scope of this paper.

2.4. Antibacterial Testing

The antibacterial activity of gallotannin-enriched hydrogels was tested using Escherichia coli, a model microorganism currently used for various experimental studies. The results of antibacterial testing (Figure A2) revealed no antibacterial effect after 4 h and 24 h. One explanation may be that gallotannins diffused out of the hydrogel during the mineralization process, and as a consequence, the amount of gallotannin remaining was too low to impede bacterial growth. Another explanation may be that the presence of mineral in the mineralized hydrogels or the non-covalent interaction with the ALP impedes diffusion of gallotannins to the surface, so insufficient amounts of gallotannin reach the bacteria. Another reason could be that the gallotannins show different antibacterial activities towards different bacterial species. In a study by Engels et al. [51], gallotannins did not inhibit the growth of lactic acid bacteria but only reduced the growth of Gram-negative Escherichia coli, and fully prevented the growth of Gram-positive food spoilage bacteria.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All materials, including GG (Gelzan™ CM, Product no. G1910, “low-acyl”, molecular weight 200–300 kD), ALP (bovine intestinal mucosa-derived, product no. P7640), and CaGP (50043), were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, unless stated otherwise. PGG and three tannic acids (ALSOK2 (1040 D, 20% PGG), ALSOK4 (850 D), and Brewtan F (1450 D, 5% PGG)) were obtained from Aji OmniChem NV, Wetteren, Belgium. Extract from mango kernel was obtained as described previously [20,51].

3.2. GG hydrogel Production, Extract, and Enzyme Incorporation and Mineralization

GG hydrogels were prepared according to the method described previously [2]. GG powder (0.42 g) was sterilized under ultraviolet (UV) light for 2 h. A stock solution of GG was prepared by dissolving the sterilized GG powder in sterile distilled water (48 mL) preheated to 70 °C. A stock solution of CaCl2 (113.65 mg in 50 mL H2O) was sterilized by autoclaving (121 °C) and preheated to 70 °C. This CaCl2 stock solution was used as a crosslinking solution. ALP stock solution (250 mg in 10 mL H2O) was sterilized by filtration (0.2 µm, Cellulose filter) and stored at 4 °C in the dark. Gallotannin stock solutions were prepared by dissolving each gallotannin preparation or extract in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 25 mg/mL and sterilizing by filtration. These 4 stock solutions (GG, CaCl2, ALP, gallotannin) were mixed in 6-well plates under sterile conditions (3 mL GG, 0.66 mL CaCl2, 0.66 mL ALP, 0.66 mL gallotannin). After solidification, sterile hole punches were used to cut out disc-shaped samples. “No extract” hydrogels (containing pure DMSO with no gallotannins) and “no enzyme” hydrogels (containing pure DMSO without gallotannins and distilled water instead of ALP solution) served as controls. For mineralization studies, hydrogel disc samples of diameter 6 mm were cut out and immersed in 10 mL mineralization medium (CaGP, 4.2 g in 200 mL H2O, sterilized in autoclave) for 4 days.

3.3. Physicochemical Characterization of Mineralized hydrogels: Dry Mass Percentage, ICP-OES, SEM, XRD, FTIR

Hydrogels were dried at 60 °C for 72 h before physicochemical characterization to remove water. Dry mass percentage (i.e., the mass percentage of mineralized hydrogels attributable to polymer and mineral and not water) served as a measure of the extent of mineralization and was calculated as weight after mineralization before drying/weight after mineralization after drying x 100%. ICP-OES was performed as described before [52]. SEM was performed with a MIRA II LMU (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) at 20 kV in secondary electron mode. Prior to analysis, a drop of an aqueous suspension of the powder was air-dried on a silicon wafer at 22 °C. Powder XRD analysis of the polycrystalline samples was performed with a Rigaku Miniflex-600 diffract meter (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The XRD data were recorded using Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 15 mA, Ni-Kβ filter) in the 2θ range of 5–60° at a scan speed 1°/min. The crystalline phases were identified with the use of integrated X-ray powder diffraction software (PDXL: Rigaku Diffraction Software) and The International Centre for Diffraction Data Powder Diffraction File (ICDD PDF)-2 datasets (Release 2014 RDB). The XRD data obtained were compared with the literature-based crystallographic data for hydroxyapatite (ref: 01-084-1998) [53]. FTIR was performed as described previously [54].

3.4. Interactions between Gallotannins and ALP

The interaction of different gallotannins with ALP was observed by using similar concentration ratios of the single compounds as those in the hydrogels. Stock solutions of GG, CaCl2, and ALP were prepared as described above but without sterilization. Here, 1 mg/mL of the gallotannins were dissolved in DMSO. Three different interaction solutions were prepared according to Table 1.
In the first interaction solution A the ALP was dissolved in water, in the second interaction solution B the ALP was dissolved with CaCl2 in water, and the third interaction solution C ALP was dissolved with CaCl2 and GG in water.
Non-covalent interactions between gallotannins and ALP were followed by fluorescence quenching analysis. Here, 1 mL of each interaction solution A, B, or C was further diluted by a factor of 10 to achieve an ideal fluorescence signal of the ALP. Here, 2 mL of each solution was filled in a quartz cuvette with four polished sides and the fluorescence emission at 340 nm was recorded at the excitation wavelength of 294 nm (using a Varian Cary Eclipse spectrometer, Varian Australia PTY. Ltd.). In addition, fluorescence spectra were recorded between 300 and 500 nm wavelengths at 294 nm emission against pure water as the reference. The same cuvettes were then placed in a UV-spectrometer (Beckmann Spectrophotometer DU530, Life Science UV/VIS) and the absorption at 294 and 340 nm wavelengths was measured against water for inner filter corrections. Following this, 10 µL of DMSO or gallotannins in DMSO (1 mg/mL) were added to the cuvette, stirred, incubated for 5 min, and fluorescence as well as UV absorption were recorded. Afterwards, a further 10 µL of the respective solutions were added and fluorescence and UV-absorption were measured until a maximum of 50 µL was reached. In this way, by adding 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 µL gallotanin solution, ALP/gallotannin mass ratios of 76:1 38:1, 25.3:1, 19:1, and 15.3:1 were achieved (This corresponds to approximate ALP/gallotannin molecular weight ratios between 0.5:1 and 0.1:1). The saturation of ALP with bound gallotannins was achieved within this range.
Protein cross-linking was also assessed by size changes via dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electrostatic complexes were evaluated using zeta-potential measurements before and after ligand addition (Table 2).
At the beginning and end of the measurement, the zeta potential and size were recorded using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments GmbH, Herrenberg, Germany). The refractive index for proteins was 1.45, while that of water was taken to be 1.33. The viscosity of water at room temperature was taken to be 0.8872 cps (centipoise) for the samples.
A solution of 1 mL CaGP (210 mg/10 mL) was added to the final solutions of the ALP with gallotannins to assess the effect on the zeta potential.

3.5. Cell Biological Characterization

3.5.1. Preparation of Hydrogels for Direct Cell Seeding and Production of Eluates

After the mineralization, hydrogels were transferred into 10 mL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 3 days to optimize pH. Hydrogels were then immersed in 10 mL of full cultivation medium (McCoy’ 5A). Three ml of the medium was taken as eluate after 2 h and another 3 mL was taken as eluate after 3 days. Eluates were used for real-time monitoring of cell growth in the xCellingence® system; hydrogels were used for the direct cell seeding.

3.5.2. Real-Time Monitoring of Cell Adhesion and Proliferation in Eluates

Cellular response of osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells (purchased from European Collection of Cell Cultures, Salisbury, UK) to different tannin acid eluates were studied at 37 °C in a humidified air atmosphere containing 5% of CO2 for 192 h. Cells were cultured in McCoy 5A medium containing fetal bovine serum (15%) and gentamicin (40 μg/mL). A real-time cell analyzer (xCelligence, Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) was used to evaluate the growth of cells in the prepared solutions continuously during an 8-day time span. The cells were seeded into 96-well sensory E plates (E-Plate 96, BioTech a.s., Prague, CR, Cat. No. 05232368001), and the background impedance was measured in each well. The cell density was 3500 cells/well (approximately 10 300 cells/cm2). The final volume of the medium with suspended cells was 200 μL. After 24 h, when the cells were attached to the well bottoms, the cultivation medium was exchanged for eluates taken after 2 h and 3 days. Each sample was added to the wells in quadruplicates. Cell on tissue culture plastic served as controls. The medium and eluates without cells served as negative controls. Cell index values (reflecting cell attachment, spreading, and proliferation) were calculated automatically by the instrument according to the formula: cell index = (impedance at individual time interval—background impedance)/15Ω).
As the primary goal of this study was to evaluate the cytocompatibility of mineralized gellan gum hydrogels loaded with different types of polyphenols, only loaded hydrogels were tested. The comparison of the hydrogel extracts with pure polyphenols extracts would have had limited value, as the extracts were solutions in pure DMSO, while the hydrogels contained a much smaller amount of DMSO and were incubated in mineralization solution for several days, lowering the DMSO concentration further.

3.5.3. Evaluation of Cellular Growth on Hydrogels after Direct Seeding by MTS Test

Hydrogels (6 mm in diameter) were placed into 48-well plates and seeded with Saos-2 cells. Tissue culture plastic served as a control. Cells (density 18 620 cells/well, approximately 19 600 cells/cm2) were cultured in McCoy 5A medium containing fetal bovine serum (15%) and gentamicin (40 μg/mL). On days 1, 3, and 7, the cell viability was estimated by a test based on MTS tetrazolium (K300-500, BioVision) conversion. Briefly, a stock solution of MTS reagent (0.1 mL) was added to the medium (1 mL). Then, 1 mL of the solution was added to the cells washed with PBS in order to remove the former medium. After 2.5 h incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the absorbance was measured (490 and 650 nm) and was corrected to the background control (a solvent mixture without cells) on a Synergy™ HT Multi-Mode Microplate reader (BioTek, USA).

3.6. Antibacterial Testing

E. coli K12 was grown in LB medium (37 °C) to achieve an optical density (O.D.) at 450 nm of 0.5, which corresponded to approximately 108 bacteria/mL, and then diluted in PBS buffer by a factor of 100 to obtain a concentration of approximately 106 bacteria/mL. Hydrogels of 12 mm diameter were incubated with 3 mL of bacterial suspension at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm. Specific volumes of suspension were taken, properly diluted, applied on agar plates, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. A drop test was conducted, involving application of 5 µL from each dilution onto agar and comparison of the density of the spots between the negative control and the sample. This served as a pilot test. This was followed by a plate count, involving application of 100 µL of appropriately diluted suspension onto an agar plate. The colonies that grew were counted and counts were compared to the negative control. Experiments were performed once.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

If not stated otherwise, all sample solutions were prepared in triplicate. Statistical significance at a level of 5% was tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey´s post-hoc test with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.07, GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).

4. Conclusions

Incorporation of a gallotannin-rich mango extract and preparations of PGG and tannic acid into GG hydrogels promoted enzymatic mineralization. Hence, gallotannins and ALP had synergistic effects on gellan gum mineralization, which could be exploited to produce composite biomaterials to replace irreversibly damaged bone tissue and also actively promote bone regeneration. The increase in mineralization was highly dependent on the gallotannin preparation. It was found in our studies that gallotannin–ALP interactions are dependent on the medium in which the interactions take place. Mineralized hydrogels containing gallotannins displayed reduced cytocompatibility and did not exhibit antibacterial activity towards E. coli.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, design, planning, T.E.L.D. and A.G.S.; methodology, T.E.L.D., J.K.K., M.V., M.P., J.B., M.F., B.V.P., Y.S., V.A., A.I., L.B. (Lieve Balcaen), F.V.; investigation, J.K.K., M.V., M.P., J.B., M.F., B.V.P., Y.S., V.A., A.I., P.R., L.B. (Lieve Balcaen); resources, P.R., F.V., A.S.; data curation, J.K.K., M.V., M.P., J.B., M.F., B.V.P., Y.S., V.A., A.I., P.R., L.B. (Lieve Balcaen); writing—original draft preparation, T.E.L.D., J.K.K., M.V., B.V.P.; writing—review and editing, L.B. (Lucie Bačáková), A.G.S.; supervision, F.V., A.S., L.B. (Lucie Bačáková), A.G.S.; project administration, T.E.L.D.; funding acquisition, T.E.L.D., J.K.K., B.V.B., L.B. (Lucie Bačáková), A.G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), postdoctoral fellowships (T.E.L.D., B.V.P.), fellowship in the framework of the agreement with the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS) (M.V.), the Special Research Fund Bijzonder Onzderzoeksfonds (BOF) of Ghent University, Belgium (grant No.: 01IO3618, BAS094-18, and BOF14/IOP/00, A.G.S.), Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (G043219, G0D7115N, A.G.S.), the German Research Foundation (DFG) (J.K.K.), and the Czech Science Foundation (grant No. 17-00885S) (L.B.).

Acknowledgments

Jesco Reimers is thanked for assistance in the lab. X-ray measurements were performed using the equipment of the Shared Research Center of Federal Research Centre (FSRC) “Crystallography and Photonics” RAS (Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia) and was supported by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (project RFMEFI62119X0035).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ALPAlkaline phosphatase
BTFBrewtan F
CaGPCalcium glycerophosphate
CaPCalcium phosphate
CDHACalcium-deficient hydroxyapatite
DLSDynamic light scattering
DMSODimethyl sulfoxide
FTIRFourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy
GGGellan gum
ICP-OESInductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy
O.D.optical density
PBSphosphate buffer saline
PDIpolydispersity index
PGGPentagalloyl glucose
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
Trptryptophan
UVultraviolet
XRDX-Ray Diffraction

Appendix A

Figure A1. Relative fluorescence intensity of (A) ALP in water, (B) ALP + CaCl2 in water, and (C) ALP + CaCl2 + GG in water with increasing concentrations of gallotannins dissolved in DMSO after correction for inner-filtering effects. In all cases, n = 3.
Figure A1. Relative fluorescence intensity of (A) ALP in water, (B) ALP + CaCl2 in water, and (C) ALP + CaCl2 + GG in water with increasing concentrations of gallotannins dissolved in DMSO after correction for inner-filtering effects. In all cases, n = 3.
Ijms 21 02315 g0a1
Figure A2. Survival of E. coli in the presence of growth of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations after 4 (blue) and 24 h (red). In all cases, n = 1.
Figure A2. Survival of E. coli in the presence of growth of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations after 4 (blue) and 24 h (red). In all cases, n = 1.
Ijms 21 02315 g0a2

References

  1. Gkioni, K.; Leeuwenburgh, S.C.; Douglas, T.E.; Mikos, A.G.; Jansen, J.A. Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part. B Rev. 2010, 16, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Douglas, T.; Wlodarczyk, M.; Pamula, E.; Declercq, H.; de Mulder, E.; Bucko, M.; Balcaen, L.; Vanhaecke, F.; Cornelissen, R.; Dubruel, P.; et al. Enzymatic mineralization of gellan gum hydrogel for bone tissue-engineering applications and its enhancement by polydopamine. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2014, 8, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dragusin, D.M.; Giol, D.E.; Vasile, E.; Zecheru, T.; Stancu, I.C. Caesin – phema: In vitro formation of nanometric ca-p nuclei. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 2011, 6, 1909–1918. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shkilnyy, A.; Graf, R.; Hiebl, B.; Neffe, A.T.; Friedrich, A.; Hartmann, J.; Taubert, A. Unprecedented, low cytotoxicity of spongelike calcium phosphate/poly(ethylene imine) hydrogel composites. Macromol Biosci. 2009, 9, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Jonge, L.T.; Leeuwenburgh, S.C.G.; van den Beucken, J.J.J.P.; Wolke, J.G.C.; Jansen, J.A. Electrosprayed Enzyme Coatings as Bioinspired Alternatives to Bioceramic Coatings for Orthopedic and Oral Implants. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saveleva, M.S.; Eftekhari, K.; Abalymov, A.; Douglas, T.E.L.; Volodkin, D.; Parakhonskiy, B.V.; Skirtach, A.G. Hierarchy of Hybrid Materials-The Place of Inorganics-in-Organics in it, Their Composition and Applications. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asenath-Smith, E.; Li, H.; Keene, E.C.; Seh, Z.W.; Estroff, L.A. Crystal Growth of Calcium Carbonate in Hydrogels as a Model of Biomineralization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2891–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kong, H.J.; Kaigler, D.; Kim, K.; Mooney, D.J. Controlling Rigidity and Degradation of Alginate Hydrogels via Molecular Weight Distribution. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 1720–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jerca, F.A.; Anghelache, A.M.; Ghibu, E.; Cecoltan, S.; Stancu, I.-C.; Trusca, R.; Vasile, E.; Teodorescu, M.; Vuluga, D.M.; Hoogenboom, R.; et al. Poly(2-isopropenyl-2-oxazoline) Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 7938–7949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xu, X.; Jerca, F.A.; Jerca, V.V.; Hoogenboom, R. Covalent Poly(2-Isopropenyl-2-Oxazoline) Hydrogels with Ultrahigh Mechanical Strength and Toughness through Secondary Terpyridine Metal-Coordination Crosslinks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, X.; Jerca, F.A.; Van Hecke, K.; Jerca, V.V.; Hoogenboom, R. High compression strength single network hydrogels with pillar[5]arene junction points. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chin, K.Y.; Ima-Nirwana, S. Olives and Bone: A Green Osteoporosis Prevention Option. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arjmandi, B.H.; Johnson, S.A.; Pourafshar, S.; Navaei, N.; George, K.S.; Hooshmand, S.; Chai, S.C.; Akhavan, N.S. Bone-Protective Effects of Dried Plum in Postmenopausal Women: Efficacy and Possible Mechanisms. Nutrients 2017, 9, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cazzola, M.; Ferraris, S.; Prenesti, E.; Casalegno, V.; Spriano, S. Grafting of Gallic Acid onto a Bioactive Ti6Al4V Alloy: A Physico-Chemical Characterization. Coatings 2019, 9, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lišková, J.; Douglas, T.E.; Beranová, J.; Skwarczyńska, A.; Božič, M.; Samal, S.K.; Modrzejewska, Z.; Gorgieva, S.; Kokol, V.; Bačáková, L. Chitosan hydrogels enriched with polyphenols: Antibacterial activity, cell adhesion and growth and mineralization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 129, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Douglas, T.E.; Dokupil, A.; Reczynska, K.; Brackman, G.; Krok-Borkowicz, M.; Keppler, J.K.; Bozic, M.; Van Der Voort, P.; Pietryga, K.; Samal, S.K.; et al. Enrichment of enzymatically mineralized gellan gum hydrogels with phlorotannin-rich ecklonia cava extract seanol((r)) to endow antibacterial properties and promote mineralization. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 045015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheynier, V.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A.; Yoshida, K. Polyphenols: From plants to a variety of food and nonfood uses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7589–7594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Murdiati, T.B.; Mcsweeney, C.S.; Lowry, J.B. Complexing of toxic hydrolyzable tannins of yellow-wood (terminalia-oblongata) and harendong (clidemia-hirta) with reactive substances—An approach to preventing toxicity. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1991, 11, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niemetz, R.; Gross, G.G. Enzymology of gallotannin and ellagitannin biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2001–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Engels, C.; Ganzle, M.G.; Schieber, A. Fractionation of gallotannins from mango (mangifera indica l.) kernels by high-speed counter-current chromatography and determination of their antibacterial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Isenburg, J.C.; Simionescu, D.T.; Starcher, B.C.; Vyavahare, N.R. Elastin stabilization for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 2007, 115, 1729–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Isenburg, J.C.; Simionescu, D.T.; Vyavahare, N.R. Elastin stabilization in cardiovascular implants: Improved resistance to enzymatic degradation by treatment with tannic acid. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 3293–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Karadeniz, F.; Ahn, B.N.; Kim, J.A.; Seo, Y.; Jang, M.S.; Nam, K.H.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.H.; Kong, C.S. Phlorotannins suppress adipogenesis in pre-adipocytes while enhancing osteoblastogenesis in pre-osteoblasts. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2015, 38, 2172–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, X.; Zhai, W.; Wu, C.; Ma, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, Z.; Chang, J. Procyanidins-crosslinked aortic elastin scaffolds with distinctive anti-calcification and biological properties. Acta Biomater. 2015, 16, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Carson, M.; Keppler, J.K.; Brackman, G.; Dawood, D.; Vandrovcova, M.; Fawzy El-Sayed, K.; Coenye, T.; Schwarz, K.; Clarke, S.A.; Skirtach, A.G.; et al. Whey Protein Complexes with Green Tea Polyphenols: Antimicrobial, Osteoblast-Stimulatory, and Antioxidant Activities. Cells Tissues Organs. 2018, 206, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Coppo, E.; Marchese, A. Antibacterial activity of polyphenols. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2014, 15, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghisaidoobe, A.B.; Chung, S.J. Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence in the detection and analysis of proteins: A focus on forster resonance energy transfer techniques. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22518–22538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Keppler, J.K.; Stuhldreier, M.C.; Temps, F.; Schwarz, K. Influence of mathematical models and correction factors on binding results of polyphenols and retinol with beta-lactoglobulin measured with fluorescence quenching. Food Biophys. 2014, 9, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Andrews, J.J.; Forster, L.S. Protein difference spectra. Effect of solvent and charge on tryptophan. Biochemistry 1972, 11, 1875–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vivian, J.T.; Callis, P.R. Mechanisms of tryptophan fluorescence shifts in proteins. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2093–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Keppler, J.K.; Sonnichsen, F.D.; Lorenzen, P.C.; Schwarz, K. Differences in heat stability and ligand binding among beta-lactoglobulin genetic variants a, b and c using h-1 h-nmr and fluorescence quenching. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta-Proteins Proteom. 2014, 1844, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Keppler, J.K.; Martin, D.; Garamus, V.M.; Schwarz, K. Differences in binding behavior of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate to -lactoglobulin heterodimers (ab) compared to homodimers (a) and (b). J. Mol. Recognit. 2015, 28, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dobreva, M.A.; Frazier, R.A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Clifton, L.A.; Gea, A.; Green, R.J. Binding of pentagalloyl glucose to two globular proteins occurs via multiple surface sites. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Frazier, R.A.; Deaville, E.R.; Green, R.J.; Stringano, E.; Willoughby, I.; Plant, J.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Interactions of tea tannins and condensed tannins with proteins. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, H.R.; Covington, A.D.; Hancock, R.A. Structure-activity relationships in the hydrophobic interactions of polyphenols with cellulose and collagen. Biopolymers 2003, 70, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goncalves, R.; Mateus, N.; Pianet, I.; Laguerre, M.; de Freitas, V. Mechanisms of tannin-induced trypsin inhibition: A molecular approach. Langmuir 2011, 27, 13122–13129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Da Violante, G.; Zerrouk, N.; Richard, I.; Provot, G.; Chaumeil, J.C.; Arnaud, P. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity effect of dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso) on caco2/tc7 colon tumor cell cultures. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 1600–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Verdanova, M.; Pytlik, R.; Kalbacova, M.H. Evaluation of sericin as a fetal bovine serum-replacing cryoprotectant during freezing of human mesenchymal stromal cells and human osteoblast-like cells. Biopreserv. Biobank 2014, 12, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sawai, M.; Takase, K.; Teraoka, H.; Tsukada, K. Reversible G1 arrest in the cell cycle of human lymphoid cell lines by dimethyl sulfoxide. Exp. Cell Res. 1990, 187, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maeno, S.; Niki, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Morioka, H.; Yatabe, T.; Funayama, A.; Toyama, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Tanaka, J. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3d culture. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4847–4855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guth, K.; Campion, C.; Buckland, T.; Hing, K.A. Effects of serum protein on ionic exchange between culture medium and microporous hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 2155–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schumacher, M.; Lode, A.; Helth, A.; Gelinsky, M. A novel strontium(II)-modified calcium phosphate bone cement stimulates human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 9547–9557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Douglas, T.E.; Krawczyk, G.; Pamula, E.; Declercq, H.A.; Schaubroeck, D.; Bucko, M.M.; Balcaen, L.; Van Der Voort, P.; Bliznuk, V.; van den Vreken, N.M.; et al. Generation of composites for bone tissue-engineering applications consisting of gellan gum hydrogels mineralized with calcium and magnesium phosphate phases by enzymatic means. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2016, 10, 938–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gonzalez-Sarrias, A.; Yuan, T.; Seeram, N.P. Cytotoxicity and structure activity relationship studies of maplexins a-i, gallotannins from red maple (acer rubrum). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Han, H.J.; Kwon, H.Y.; Sohn, E.J.; Ko, H.; Kim, B.; Jung, K.; Lew, J.H.; Kim, S.H. Suppression of e-cadherin mediates gallotannin induced apoptosis in hep g2 hepatocelluar carcinoma cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Park, E.; Kwon, H.Y.; Jung, J.H.; Jung, D.B.; Jeong, A.; Cheon, J.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.H. Inhibition of myeloid cell leukemia 1 and activation of caspases are critically involved in gallotannin-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Phytother Res. 2015, 29, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kwon, H.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, B.; Srivastava, S.K.; Kim, S.H. Regulation of sirt1/ampk axis is critically involved in gallotannin-induced senescence and impaired autophagy leading to cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 92, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Inoue, M.; Suzuki, R.; Sakaguchi, N.; Li, Z.; Takeda, T.; Ogihara, Y.; Jiang, B.Y.; Chen, Y. Selective induction of cell death in cancer cells by gallic acid. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 18, 1526–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sakaguchi, N.; Inoue, M.; Isuzugawa, K.; Ogihara, Y.; Hosaka, K. Cell death-inducing activity by gallic acid derivatives. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 22, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sakagami, H.; Jiang, Y.; Kusama, K.; Atsumi, T.; Ueha, T.; Toguchi, M.; Iwakura, I.; Satoh, K.; Ito, H.; Hatano, T.; et al. Cytotoxic activity of hydrolyzable tannins against human oral tumor cell lines—A possible mechanism. Phytomedicine 2000, 7, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Engels, C.; Knodler, M.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Carle, R.; Ganzle, M.G.; Schieber, A. Antimicrobial activity of gallotannins isolated from mango (mangifera indica l.) kernels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7712–7718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gassling, V.; Douglas, T.E.; Purcz, N.; Schaubroeck, D.; Balcaen, L.; Bliznuk, V.; Declercq, H.A.; Vanhaecke, F.; Dubruel, P. Magnesium-enhanced enzymatically mineralized platelet-rich fibrin for bone regeneration applications. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 8, 055001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hughes, J.M.; Cameron, M.; Crowley, K.D. Structural variations in natural f, oh, and cl apatites. Am. Mineral. 1989, 74, 870–876. [Google Scholar]
  54. Douglas, T.E.; Lapa, A.; Reczynska, K.; Krok-Borkowicz, M.; Pietryga, K.; Samal, S.K.; Declercq, H.A.; Schaubroeck, D.; Boone, M.; Van der Voort, P.; et al. Novel injectable, self-gelling hydrogel-microparticle composites for bone regeneration consisting of gellan gum and calcium and magnesium carbonate microparticles. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 065011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (AE) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations, (F) Dry mass percentage of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations (n = 3). (G) Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) determination of amounts of elemental Ca (blue) and P (red) in mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations (n = 3).
Figure 1. (AE) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations, (F) Dry mass percentage of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations (n = 3). (G) Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) determination of amounts of elemental Ca (blue) and P (red) in mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations (n = 3).
Ijms 21 02315 g001
Figure 2. (A) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations. Peaks indicated with red squares correspond to the hydroxyapatite phase. The Miller indices of each peak are highlighted on top. (B) FTIR analysis of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations.
Figure 2. (A) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations. Peaks indicated with red squares correspond to the hydroxyapatite phase. The Miller indices of each peak are highlighted on top. (B) FTIR analysis of mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations.
Ijms 21 02315 g002
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence emission spectra between 300 and 460 nm at 294 nm extinction of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in water with increasing concentrations of gallotannins dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (B) Spectra between 300 and 460 nm with excitation at 294 nm of ALP + CaCl2, with increasing concentrations of tannins. (C) Spectra between 300 and 40 nm with excitation at 294 nm of ALP + CaCl2 + gellan gum (GG), with increasing concentrations of gallotannins. The vertical line at 340 nm was added to facilitate optical comparison of the different spectra.
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence emission spectra between 300 and 460 nm at 294 nm extinction of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in water with increasing concentrations of gallotannins dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (B) Spectra between 300 and 460 nm with excitation at 294 nm of ALP + CaCl2, with increasing concentrations of tannins. (C) Spectra between 300 and 40 nm with excitation at 294 nm of ALP + CaCl2 + gellan gum (GG), with increasing concentrations of gallotannins. The vertical line at 340 nm was added to facilitate optical comparison of the different spectra.
Ijms 21 02315 g003aIjms 21 02315 g003b
Figure 4. Zeta potential (mV) of ALP in water, ALP with CaCl2, and ALP with CaCl2 and GG with 20 or 50 µL of gallotannins in DMSO and with CaGP: (A) without gallotannins; (B) ALSOK2; (C) ALSOK4; (D) PGG; (E) Brewtan F. In all cases, n = 3.
Figure 4. Zeta potential (mV) of ALP in water, ALP with CaCl2, and ALP with CaCl2 and GG with 20 or 50 µL of gallotannins in DMSO and with CaGP: (A) without gallotannins; (B) ALSOK2; (C) ALSOK4; (D) PGG; (E) Brewtan F. In all cases, n = 3.
Ijms 21 02315 g004
Figure 5. Cell biological and antibacterial testing. (A) Growth of Saos-2 cells in eluate from mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations incubated for 2 h in cell culture medium. Tissue culture plastic served as a control. (B) Growth of Saos-2 cells in eluate from mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations incubated for 3 d in cell culture medium. Tissue culture plastic served as a control. (C) Growth of Saos-2 cells on mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations. Tissue culture plastic served as a control.
Figure 5. Cell biological and antibacterial testing. (A) Growth of Saos-2 cells in eluate from mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations incubated for 2 h in cell culture medium. Tissue culture plastic served as a control. (B) Growth of Saos-2 cells in eluate from mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations incubated for 3 d in cell culture medium. Tissue culture plastic served as a control. (C) Growth of Saos-2 cells on mineralized hydrogels containing different gallotannin preparations. Tissue culture plastic served as a control.
Ijms 21 02315 g005
Table 1. Composition of interaction solutions used to study interactions between gallotannins and ALP.
Table 1. Composition of interaction solutions used to study interactions between gallotannins and ALP.
Interaction Solution NameALP Stock Solution (mL)Water (mL)CaCl2 Stock Solution (mL)GG Stock Solution (mL)Final Volume (mL)
A0.663.66004.32
B0.6630.6604.32
C0.6600.6634.32
Table 2. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (z-average and polydispersity index (PDI)) of ALP aggregates in interaction solution C (see Table 2). In all cases, n = 3.
Table 2. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (z-average and polydispersity index (PDI)) of ALP aggregates in interaction solution C (see Table 2). In all cases, n = 3.
Interaction Solution20 µL Interaction Solution *50 µL Interaction Solution *
z-average (nm)PDIz-average (nm)PDI
C (ALP/GG):DMSO (no gallotannins)82 ± 15 a,b0.9100 ± 32 10.9
C (ALP/GG):ALSOK 480 ± 13 a0.991 ± 02 10.7
C (ALP/GG):ALSOK 2127 ± 08 a,b0.6148 ± 19 1,20.5
C (ALP/GG):PGG118 ± 16 a,b0.6166 ± 56 20.5
C (ALP/GG):Brewtan F150 ± 08 b0.2207 ± 03 2,30.1
Note: * 20 or 50 µL gallotannin solution (1 mg/mL) or pure DMSO (0 mg gallotannins/mL) was added to each interaction solution. All measurements were conducted in triplicate. The values are listed as mean ± standard deviation. Values with different superscripted letters or numbers are significantly different (<0.05). Values with the same number or letter are not significantly different.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Douglas, T.E.L.; Keppler, J.K.; Vandrovcová, M.; Plencner, M.; Beranová, J.; Feuereisen, M.; Parakhonskiy, B.V.; Svenskaya, Y.; Atkin, V.; Ivanova, A.; et al. Enhancement of Biomimetic Enzymatic Mineralization of Gellan Gum Polysaccharide Hydrogels by Plant-Derived Gallotannins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072315

AMA Style

Douglas TEL, Keppler JK, Vandrovcová M, Plencner M, Beranová J, Feuereisen M, Parakhonskiy BV, Svenskaya Y, Atkin V, Ivanova A, et al. Enhancement of Biomimetic Enzymatic Mineralization of Gellan Gum Polysaccharide Hydrogels by Plant-Derived Gallotannins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(7):2315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Douglas, Timothy E. L., Julia K. Keppler, Marta Vandrovcová, Martin Plencner, Jana Beranová, Michelle Feuereisen, Bogdan V. Parakhonskiy, Yulia Svenskaya, Vsevolod Atkin, Anna Ivanova, and et al. 2020. "Enhancement of Biomimetic Enzymatic Mineralization of Gellan Gum Polysaccharide Hydrogels by Plant-Derived Gallotannins" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 7: 2315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop