Correction to: International Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 109:1767–1810 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01872-2

The authors regret to have inadvertently supplied an erroneous version of the data table displaying recalculated titanite analyses (Electronic Supplementary Material 4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00531-020-01872-2). The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Table 1 Titanite formulae (atoms per formula unit, apfu) recalculated on the basis of 20 oxygen equivalents; FeII/FeIII allocated assuming 12 cations per formula unit (Droop 1987)

 

24/1323

25/1323

30/K0039C

Nb2O5

1.382

0.812

0.180

Ta2O5

b.d.l

0.422

b.d.l

SiO2

29.773

29.697

30.496

TiO2

35.166

36.023

36.845

Al2O3

1.271

1.427

1.728

V2O3

b.d.l

0.488

b.d.l

Fe2O3

0.445

0.650

0.265

Y2O3

0.357

0.501

La2O3

b.d.l

0.155

b.d.l

Ce2O3

0.835

0.916

0.489

Nd2O3

0.773

0.814

0.272

CaO

26.646

26.685

28.227

MnO

b.d.l

0.080

b.d.l

FeO

0.000

0.000

0.000

SnO

1.564

0.514

b.d.l

F

0.230

0.248

0.297

Σ

98.442

99.432

98.799

Nb

0.085

0.049

0.011

Ta

0.000

0.015

0.000

Si

4.060

3.984

4.019

Ti

3.607

3.635

3.653

Al

0.204

0.226

0.268

V

0.000

0.052

0.000

FeIII

0.046

0.066

0.026

Y

0.026

0.036

0.000

La

0.000

0.008

0.000

Ce

0.042

0.045

0.024

Nd

0.038

0.039

0.013

Ca

3.893

3.835

3.986

Mn

0.000

0.009

0.000

FeII

0.000

0.000

0.000

Σ_cations

12.000

12.000

12.000

Ti_Y

3.607

3.635

3.653

Al_Y

0.204

0.226

0.268

FeIII_Y

0.046

0.066

0.026

Ta_Y

0.000

0.015

0.000

Σ_Y

3.857

3.942

3.948

Ca_X

3.893

3.835

3.986

La_X

0.000

0.008

0.000

Ce_X

0.042

0.045

0.024

Nd_X

0.038

0.039

0.013

Mn_X

0.000

0.009

0.000

FeII_X

0.000

0.000

0.000

V_X

0.000

0.052

0.000

Nb_X

0.085

0.049

0.011

Y_X

0.026

0.036

0.000

Σ_X

4.083

4.074

4.033