Correction to: International Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 109:1767–1810 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01872-2
The authors regret to have inadvertently supplied an erroneous version of the data table displaying recalculated titanite analyses (Electronic Supplementary Material 4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00531-020-01872-2). The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 1 Titanite formulae (atoms per formula unit, apfu) recalculated on the basis of 20 oxygen equivalents; FeII/FeIII allocated assuming 12 cations per formula unit (Droop 1987)
24/1323 | 25/1323 | 30/K0039C | |
---|---|---|---|
Nb2O5 | 1.382 | 0.812 | 0.180 |
Ta2O5 | b.d.l | 0.422 | b.d.l |
SiO2 | 29.773 | 29.697 | 30.496 |
TiO2 | 35.166 | 36.023 | 36.845 |
Al2O3 | 1.271 | 1.427 | 1.728 |
V2O3 | b.d.l | 0.488 | b.d.l |
Fe2O3 | 0.445 | 0.650 | 0.265 |
Y2O3 | 0.357 | 0.501 | – |
La2O3 | b.d.l | 0.155 | b.d.l |
Ce2O3 | 0.835 | 0.916 | 0.489 |
Nd2O3 | 0.773 | 0.814 | 0.272 |
CaO | 26.646 | 26.685 | 28.227 |
MnO | b.d.l | 0.080 | b.d.l |
FeO | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
SnO | 1.564 | 0.514 | b.d.l |
F | 0.230 | 0.248 | 0.297 |
Σ | 98.442 | 99.432 | 98.799 |
---|---|---|---|
Nb | 0.085 | 0.049 | 0.011 |
Ta | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Si | 4.060 | 3.984 | 4.019 |
Ti | 3.607 | 3.635 | 3.653 |
Al | 0.204 | 0.226 | 0.268 |
V | 0.000 | 0.052 | 0.000 |
FeIII | 0.046 | 0.066 | 0.026 |
Y | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.000 |
La | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Ce | 0.042 | 0.045 | 0.024 |
Nd | 0.038 | 0.039 | 0.013 |
Ca | 3.893 | 3.835 | 3.986 |
Mn | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 |
FeII | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Σ_cations | 12.000 | 12.000 | 12.000 |
---|---|---|---|
Ti_Y | 3.607 | 3.635 | 3.653 |
Al_Y | 0.204 | 0.226 | 0.268 |
FeIII_Y | 0.046 | 0.066 | 0.026 |
Ta_Y | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Σ_Y | 3.857 | 3.942 | 3.948 |
---|---|---|---|
Ca_X | 3.893 | 3.835 | 3.986 |
La_X | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Ce_X | 0.042 | 0.045 | 0.024 |
Nd_X | 0.038 | 0.039 | 0.013 |
Mn_X | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 |
FeII_X | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
V_X | 0.000 | 0.052 | 0.000 |
Nb_X | 0.085 | 0.049 | 0.011 |
Y_X | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.000 |
Σ_X | 4.083 | 4.074 | 4.033 |
Reference
Droop GTR (1987) A general equation for estimating Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian silicates using stoichiometric criteria. Mineral Mag 51:431–435
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janoušek, V., Hanžl, P., Svojtka, M. et al. Correction to: Ultrapotassic magmatism in the heyday of the Variscan Orogeny: the story of the Třebíč Pluton, the largest durbachitic body in the Bohemian Massif. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 110, 1137–1138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-01993-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-01993-2