New cross-section data for proton-induced reactions on natTi and natCu with special regard to the beam monitoring

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2020.08.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Excitation functions of the reactions natTi(p,x)48V, 43Sc, 44gSc, 44mSc, 46m+gSc, 47Sc, 48Sc and natCu(p,x)62Zn, 63Zn, 65Zn, 61Cu, 58m+gCo were measured in the energy interval of 6.4–36.0 MeV (titanium) and 7.3–35.9 MeV (copper) with use of stacked-foil technique and off-line γ-ray spectrometry. The results were compared with previously published experimental data and with prediction of the nuclear reaction model code TALYS adopted from the TENDL-2019 online library. Thick target yields were calculated from the obtained cross-sections. Finally, we fit the selected experimental data sets for the natTi(p,x)48V and natCu(p,x)62,63,65Zn reactions and compare the results with the IAEA recommended cross-sections.

Introduction

Nuclear reactions of charged particles on metals easily available as thin foils of even thickness and forming well measurable radionuclides are suitable for cyclotron beam monitoring. Among them, proton-induced reactions on aluminium, titanium and copper resulting in sodium, vanadium, scandium, zinc and cobalt isotopes are the most widespread. For such a purpose, precise knowledge of their excitation functions is inevitable. Reasonable amount of sound experimental data is required for construction of recommended cross-sections for the beam monitoring [1], and more independent measurements contribute to their reliability and gradual improvement.

We have, therefore, carefully re-measured excitation functions of proton-induced reactions on titanium and copper. Part of these unpublished data was already provided in a private communication for deducing recommended cross-sections [1]. In this work, we present complete experimental material.

Section snippets

Target and irradiation

The cross-sections were measured using well-established stacked foil method followed by off-line γ-ray spectrometry. Two stacks of metal foils were irradiated on the external proton beam of cyclotron U-120 M in the Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS. Both stacks contained ten natMo foils (99.9%, 19.3 μm thick, Goodfellow, GB), ten natCu foils (99.9%, 10.6 μm thick, Goodfellow, GB), eleven natTi foils (99.6%, 11.0 μm thick, Alfa Aesar, USA) and some natCu foils (55.9 μm thick) acting as energy

Beam energy and current

Proton beam energy deduced from the precisely measured beam orbit position was 36.00 ± 0.30 MeV and 21.35 ± 0.30 MeV respectively for the 1st and 2nd stack of foils. The beam current obtained from continuous recording of the proton beam was 1.230 μA for the 1st stack and 0.5078 μA for the 2nd stack of foils. These values were used for calculation of cross-sections without any further correction and their estimated uncertainty was 6%. The data obtained from both irradiations are well consistent

Conclusion

In this paper, we present new measurement of excitation functions for the natTi(p,x)48V, 43Sc, 44gSc, 44mSc, 46m+gSc, 47Sc, 48Sc reactions in the energy range 6.4–36.0 MeV, and for the natCu(p,x)62Zn, 63Zn, 65Zn, 61Cu, 58m+gCo reactions in the energy range of 7.3–35.9 MeV. Our cross-sections were compared with previously published experimental data and with prediction of the nuclear reaction model code TALYS adopted from the TENDL-2019 online library. We calculated thick target yields for all

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jaroslav Červenák: Methodology, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Ondřej Lebeda: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the crew of the U-120M cyclotron for the irradiations and to Dr. Petr Hanč and Anton Cvíčela for the help with the γ-ray spectra measurements. The work was supported by the IAEA Coordinated Research Project “Nuclear Data for Charged-Particle Monitor Reactions and Medical Isotope Production” under the contract no. 17461, by the Czech Academy of Sciences under the NPI research plan AV0Z10480505 and the irradiations were carried out at the CANAM infrastructure of the

References (54)

  • M.E. Bennett et al.

    Measurement of the natLu(p,x)175Hf excitation function

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B

    (2012)
  • E. Garrido et al.

    New excitation functions for proton induced reactions on natural titanium, nickel and copper up to 70 MeV

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B

    (2016)
  • A. Hermanne et al.

    Excitation functions for production of 46Sc by deuteron and proton beams in natTi: A basis for additional monitor reactions

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B

    (2014)
  • S.J. Mills et al.

    Experimental and Theoretical excitation functions of radionuclides produced in proton bombardment of copper up to 200 MeV

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1992)
  • M.S. Uddin et al.

    Experimental studies on the proton-induced activation reactions of molybdenum in the energy range 22–67 MeV

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2004)
  • E.Z. Buthelezi et al.

    Excitation functions for the production of 82Sr by proton bombardment of natRb at energies up to 100 MeV

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2006)
  • M.U. Khandaker et al.

    Measurement of cross-sections for the (p, xn) reactions in natural molybdenum

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B

    (2007)
  • T. Siiskonen et al.

    Excitation functions of proton-induced reactions in natCu in the energy range 7–17 MeV

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2009)
  • M. Shahid et al.

    Measurement of excitation functions in proton induced reactions on natural copper from their threshold to 43 MeV

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B

    (2015)
  • Y. Yoshizawa et al.

    Isotope separator on-line at INS FM cyclotron

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res.

    (1976)
  • P. Kopecky

    Proton beam monitoring via the Cu(p,x)58Co, 63Cu(p,2n)62Zn and 65Cu(p,n)65Zn reactions in copper

    Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1985)
  • S.A. Graves et al.

    Nuclear excitation functions of proton-induced reactions (Ep=35-90 MeV) from Fe, Cu and Al

    Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res.B

    (2016)
  • M. Čihák, O. Lebeda, J. Štursa, Beam dynamic simulation in the isochronous cyclotron U-120M, in: Proceedings of the...
  • J.F. Ziegler, M.D. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack: SRIM2010 Code. Available at URL...
  • J. Frána

    Program DEIMOS32 for gamma-ray spectra evaluation

    J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.

    (2003)
  • NuDat 2.6. National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2012. Available at URL...
  • B. Pritychenko, A. Sonzogni: Q-value calculator, NNDC, Brookhaven National Laboratory. Available from URL...
  • Cited by (12)

    • Preliminary investigation of <sup>48</sup>V-labeled VO(acac)<inf>2</inf> for cancer imaging: An initial proof-of-concept study

      2022, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anticipated reactions are shown in Table 1; only those with a cross section larger than 1 mB are included in the yield estimation. The cross sections for these reactions were taken from Cervenak and Lebeda (2020). Thin, natural titanium foils (Grade 1 - ASTM B265, Goodfellow) of 99.6% purity and 0.012 mm (for target 1, see below) or 0.0125 mm (for target 2, also see later) thickness were purchased from Goodfellow Cambridge, Ltd. (Huntington, England).

    • Measurement of the <sup>nat</sup>Dy(p,x) nuclear reactions cross-sections

      2022, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
      Citation Excerpt :

      The beam currents recorded by the beam integrator were 0.734 μA and 0.769 μA for the 1st and 2nd stack of foils, respectively. The entrance beam energies were slightly corrected within their uncertainties to 36.00 MeV and 20.15 MeV using reconstructed natTi(p,x)48V monitoring reaction excitation function in comparison with the IAEA recommended cross-sections [13] as well as our recommended data [14], see Fig. 1. Beam currents were not corrected at all.

    • Experimental cross-sections for proton induced reactions on natural molybdenum

      2022, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text