Elsevier

Fisheries Research

Volume 230, October 2020, 105673
Fisheries Research

Ontogenetic and interpopulation differences in otolith shape of the European perch (Perca fluviatilis)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105673Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is a clear interpopulation difference in Perca fluviatilis otolith shapes.

  • Perca fluviatilis otolith shapes vary ontogenetically.

  • Fish-otolith length relationship is better described by a logistic curve.

Abstract

Fish otoliths are conservative structures that are widely used on fishery science for multiple purposes. Despite its relevance in the research field, little is known about the ontogeny and inter-population effects on the otolith of freshwater fish. In this study we used otoliths from 1800 European perch (Perca fluviatilis) individuals from 9 different populations to analyze the ontogenetic and inter-population differences on the otolith shape using six morphometric indices. The relationship between fish and otolith length was fitted using three different regression models (linear, power and logistic) to identify the best allometric relationship. Our results show that there are strong ontogenetic and interpopulation differences in P. fluviatilis otolith shapes. We also show that the relationship between the fish and otolith length follows a logistic curve. The ontogenetic differences on otolith shape might be related to extrinsic factors (diet shift and intra and interspecific competition) in each ecosystem, given that the reservoirs are different and no clear pattern on the otolith shapes can be distinguished among populations. Our results imply that the available back-calculation models may not always provide accurate estimates of P. fluviatilis length and that a model that takes into account the real allometric relationship for the species can improve the fish length estimations of back-calculated fish lengths for the European perch.

Introduction

The discovery of otolith growth increments (Pannella, 1971) paved the way for the use of these calcified structures in life-history and evolutionary studies of fishes (Begg et al., 2005; Campana, 2005; Campana and Neilson, 1985; Campana and Thorrold, 2001; Enberg et al., 2012). Otoliths have been extensively used in recent years for many different aims, which include stock discrimination, habitat use, migration and growth patterns (Campana and Casselman, 1993; Campana and Thorrold, 2001; Secor et al., 1995). Among other applications, otoliths can be used to back-calculate individual size at age to ascertain individual growth patterns at daily and yearly scales and their relationship with the environment. This makes them a perfect tool to study fish growth, which is a key component of many fisheries management and fish ecology studies.

The classical back-calculation and growth studies on fish were developed using fish scales (Fraser, 1916; Lea, 1910; Lee, 1920), but this structure is less precise than otoliths (Robillard and Ellen Marsden, 1996) and they have a poor comparability with otoliths (Muir et al., 2008). New and more precise back-calculation models based on otoliths have emerged in the last decades (Campana, 1990; Morita and Matsuishi, 2001), using different equations to describe the relationship between fish and otolith length. This relationship is crucial to any back-calculation model because it directly affects the model outputs, and consequently the information on fish growth (Ashworth et al., 2017; Günther et al., 2012; Li et al., 2008; Wilson et al., 2009).

The somatic growth patterns in fish are well documented, but the growth patterns of otoliths are poorly known. The shape ontogeny of these calcified structures depends on genetics (Cardinale et al., 2004; Lombarte and Lleonart, 1993; Reichenbacher et al., 2009; Vignon and Morat, 2010), individual sex, age, year class, diet, water depth, temperature and substrate type (Begg and Brown, 2000; Cardinale et al., 2004; Castonguay et al., 1991; Gagliano and McCormick, 2004; Hüssy, 2008; Li et al., 2008; Lombarte and Lleonart, 1993; Mérigot et al., 2007; Vignon, 2018). Given that otolith shape and structure can vary through fish ontogeny (Hare and Cowen, 1995), it is important to account for any changes in the underlying allometries when applying back-calculation models (Günther et al., 2012). Mismatch between the assumptions of the back-calculation models and the ‘true’ fish length-otolith length relationship can result in wrong conclusions about the determination of fish age, growth and the timing of critical reproductive events, which can have important repercussions for the management of fish stocks (Francis, 1990; Hare and Cowen, 1995; Moyano et al., 2020; Thorrold and Hare, 2002).

Complex relationships between individual fish length and otolith size and shape can be particularly important for a species that undergo a conspicuous ontogenetic habitat and diet shift that is dependent on environmental triggers, such as the European perch (Perca fluviatilis) (Allen, 1935; Byström et al., 2012; Dörner et al., 2001; Kratochvil et al., 2008; Persson et al., 2004). Given the environmental conditions heterogeneity among populations and their influence on otolith shape (Vignon, 2012), ontogenetic shifts in the shape of P. fluviatilis otoliths are likely to occur. Despite the knowledge on these processes (Butler, 1989; Hobbs et al., 2007; Laidig et al., 1991; Vigliola et al., 2000), little is known about the inter-population variation on otolith shapes. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to describe how the otolith allometry varies among populations using the European perch as a model species. Specifically we aim I) to describe how the P. fluviatilis otolith shape varies through ontogeny and how this process differs among non-related populations; and II) to compare the fitting of fish-otolith allometry models that are commonly used for the fish length back-calculations.

Section snippets

Studied populations, fish sampling and processing

European perch individuals were captured using the European standard multimesh gillnets (CEN 2005) in 9 different freshwater waterbodies in Czechia (Chabarovice, Lipno, Medard, Most, Římov, Rozkoš, Želivka and Žlutice) and the Netherlands (Honderd en Dertig) from 2010 to 2016 (Fig. 1).

Sagittal otoliths of 1800 individuals were extracted from the cranial cavity after the fish had their standard length (SL) measured to the nearest millimeter (fish < 100 mm of SL) or to the nearest 5 mm (fish >

Results

Individual fish sampled for otoliths (n = 1800) ranged from 78 to 375 mm of SL (mean ± SD = 173.7 ± 61.7 mm) and their mean ± SD age was 2.42 ± 1.63 years (Table 2).

Discussion

Our results show that there are clear ontogenetic and interpopulation differences on the otolith shape of P. fluviatilis. This is probably due to the ontogeny in P. fluviatilis otolith growth. P. fluviatilis otoliths tend to be elongated when fishes are young and old, and more rounded at intermediate ages (3 to 6 years). As a result, allometry models that use a linear or a power relationship between the fish and its otolith length fail to capture fully the ontogeny of P. fluviatilis otoliths.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

A.T. Souza: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. K. Soukalová: Data curation, Investigation. V. Děd: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing - review & editing. M. Šmejkal: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. P. Blabolil: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. M. Říha: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. T. Jůza: Investigation, Writing -

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ivan Jaric and Martina Ilarri for their valuable help in the discussion of the statistical methods and results interpretation. This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 677039 project CLIMEFISH and from ERDF/ESF project “Biomanipulation as a tool for improving water quality of dam reservoirs” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007417). This research was also supported by project

References (104)

  • M. Ali et al.

    Compensatory growth in fishes: a response to growth depression

    Fish Fish.

    (2003)
  • K.R. Allen

    The food and migration of the perch (Perca fluviatilis) in Windermere

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (1935)
  • M.J. Anderson

    A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance

    Austral Ecol.

    (2001)
  • E.C. Ashworth et al.

    Age and growth rate variation influence the functional relationship between somatic and otolith size

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2017)
  • G.A. Begg et al.

    Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis

    Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.

    (2000)
  • G.A. Begg et al.

    Otolith research and application: current directions in innovation and implementation

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Bertignac et al.

    Consequences of bias in age estimation on assessment of the northern stock of European hake (Merluccius merluccius) and on management advice

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2007)
  • R. Bivand et al.

    Rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine - Open Source (’GEOS’)

    (2019)
  • N. Burke et al.

    Otolith shape analysis: its application for discriminating between stocks of Irish Sea and Celtic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2008)
  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • J.L. Butler

    Growth during the larval and juvenile stages of the northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, in the California current during 1980-84

    Fish. Bull. NOAA

    (1989)
  • P. Byström et al.

    Ontogenetic constraints and diet shifts in Perch (Perca fluviatilis): mechanisms and consequences for intra-cohort cannibalism

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2012)
  • G.M. Cailliet et al.

    Age-validated longevity of fishes: its importance for sustainable fisheries

    Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 5th World Fisheries Congress 2008

    (2008)
  • S.E. Campana

    How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths?

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1990)
  • S.E. Campana

    Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2001)
  • S.E. Campana

    Otolith science entering the 21st century

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2005)
  • S.E. Campana et al.

    Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1993)
  • S.E. Campana et al.

    Microstructure of fish otoliths

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1985)
  • S.E. Campana et al.

    Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations?

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2001)
  • M. Cardinale et al.

    Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M. Castonguay et al.

    Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1991)
  • E.L. Charnov

    Fish growth: Bertalanffy k is proportional to reproductive effort

    Environ. Biol. Fishes

    (2008)
  • E.L. Charnov et al.

    Evolutionary assembly rules for fish life histories

    Fish Fish.

    (2013)
  • P. Chauvelon et al.

    Modelling the otolith shape as an ellipse: an attempt for back-calculation purposes

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J. Claude

    Morphometrics with R, Use R!

    (2008)
  • A. Cruz et al.

    Otolith size and its relationship with colour patterns and sound production

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2004)
  • K.W. Duncan

    On the back-calculation of fish lengths; modifications and extensions to the Fraser-Lee equation

    J. Fish Biol.

    (1980)
  • K. Enberg et al.

    Fishing-induced evolution of growth: concepts, mechanisms and the empirical evidence

    Mar. Ecol.

    (2012)
  • D.P. Fey

    The effect of temperature and somatic growth on otolith growth: the discrepancy between two clupeid species from a similar environment

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2006)
  • C.J. Fox et al.

    Otolith micro-increment formation in herring Clupea harengus larvae in relation to growth rate

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2003)
  • R.I.C.C. Francis

    Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review

    J. Fish Biol.

    (1990)
  • C.M. Fraser

    Growth of the spring salmon

    Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.

    (1916)
  • M. Gagliano et al.

    Feeding history influences otolith shape in tropical fish

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2004)
  • C.C. Günther et al.

    A novel length back-calculation approach accounting for ontogenetic changes in the fish length – otolith size relationship during the early life of sprat (Sprattus sprattus)

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2012)
  • J. Hare et al.

    Effect of age, growth-rate, and ontogeny on the otolith size - fish sire relationship in bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, and the implications for back-calculation of sire in fish early-life history stages

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1995)
  • J.A. Hobbs et al.

    Modification of the biological intercept model to account for ontogenetic effects in laboratory-reared delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus)

    Fish. Bull. NOAA

    (2007)
  • K.E.F. Hokanson

    Temperature requirements of some percids and adaptations to the seasonal temperature cycle

    J. Fish Res. Board Can.

    (1977)
  • T. Hothorn et al.

    lmtest: Testing Linear Regression Models

    (2019)
  • D.J. Jellyman

    Age, growth, and reproduction of perch, Perca fluviatilis L., in Lake Pounui

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (1980)
  • E. Jeppesen et al.

    Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading – an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Shape and ontogenetic changes in otolith of the ocellated icefish (Chionodraco rastrospinosus) from the Bransfield Strait, Antarctic

      2022, Zoology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The sagittal otoliths are also easily accessible and resist digestion in the alimentary canal of predators (Tuset et al., 2003a, 2003b), providing a good opportunity to use these calcified structures to elucidate the life history and evolutionary studies of fish (Campana and Thorrold, 2001; Campana, 2005; Zhu et al., 2018; Duan et al., 2021) and to discriminate between local fish stocks and populations (Tuset et al., 2006). Otoliths can also be used to calculate the individual sizes at a particular age to explore the individual growth patterns (Souza et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020), type of swimming activity (Lychakov and Rebane, 2000), and their relationship with the environment (Hüssy, 2008; Vignon, 2012; Zhu et al., 2018; Duan et al., 2021). The information generated from these processes related to morphological hypotheses about the shape of fish otoliths can be useful for fisheries management and fish ecology studies.

    • Varying relationships between fish length and scale size under changing environmental conditions – Multidecadal perspective in Atlantic herring

      2022, Ecological Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are also certain modeling issues that should be considered when interpreting the results. While the relationships between fish length and size of calcified structures can be asymptotic (Casselman, 1990; Souza et al., 2020), we assumed that this effect is negligible, and for simplicity, we applied a linear model. At first, we tested also generalized additive quantile regression, but the model fit was better with the currently used linear quantile regression.

    • Otolith shape analysis of the Brazilian silverside in two northeastern Brazilian estuaries with distinct salinity ranges

      2021, Fisheries Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The variability in otolith morphology and morphometry in fishes is a useful tool to determine the factors associated with aspects of ontogenetic shifts in habitat use (Biolé et al., 2019), spatial and temporal migrations (Souza et al., 2020; Aschenbrenner et al., 2016), and this variability can provide possible contributions to understanding some aspects of life history as well as stock structure (Gonzalez-Naya et al., 2012).

    • Otolith shape variations between artificially stocked and autochthonous pikeperch (Sander lucioperca)

      2020, Fisheries Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      SICO and SISO were computed using the functions coo_convexity and coo_solidity from the Momocs package respectively (Bonhomme et al., 2014). The use of different shape indices in the same otolith provides numerical evidence to describe spatial format of the structure (Souza et al., 2020; Tuset et al., 2003), and hence is essential to a robust analysis on the 2D format of the calcified structures. The mean values, standard error and confidence intervals of the otolith descriptors and shape indices were obtained after data bootstrapping with 1000 bootstrap replicates of indices using the functions boot and boot.ci from the package boot (Canty, 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text