Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T12:41:38.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polytypism of Cronstedtite from Ouedi Beht, El Hammam, Morocco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jiří Hybler*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Slovance 2, CZ-182 21 Praha 8, Czech Republic
Zdeněk Dolníček
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic
Jiří Sejkora
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic
Martin Števko
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-840 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: hybler@fzu.cz

Abstract

The present study deals with accurate identification of polytypes, twins, and allotwins – oriented crystal associations of more than one polytype. The trioctahedral 1:1 layered silicate cronstedtite was studied using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data collected with a four-circle diffractometer equipped with a CCD detector. The sample from the skarn occurrence, Ouedi Beht, El Hammam, Morocco, was explored. It contains cronstedtite in fibrous massive aggregates in the central part, and euhedral crystals in surrounding veinlets and druses. The reciprocal space (RS) sections created by the diffractometer software and presented here were used to determine the OD (ordered-disordered) subfamilies (Bailey’s group A, B, C, D) and to identify polytypes. The chemical compositions of some crystals were determined thereafter by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA-WDS). Some crystals studied are more or less complicated allotwins. Polytypes were thus separated by cleaving crystals into smaller parts in many cases. All polytypes found belong to subfamilies A or D. The following polytypes of the subfamily A were identified: 2M1 (a = 5.49, b = 9.51, c = 14.40 Å, β = 97.30°, space group Cc), 1M (a = 5.51, b = 9.54, c = 7.33 Å, β = 104.5°, Cm), 3T (a = 5.51, c = 21.32 Å, P31), 6T2 (a = 5.50, c = 42.60 Å, P31). 2M1 and 3T were present as isolated crystals or separated by cleaving, otherwise all these polytypes are parts of allotwins. The 2M1 polytype is sometimes twinned by reticular pseudo merohedry with twin index n = 3 and 120° rotation about the chex axis as the twin operation. Allotwins of 1M + twinned 2M1 polytypes are also present. Another kind of twinning, with rotation by (2n+1)×60° about chex is rare. The subfamily D is represented mostly by 2H1 and 2H2 polytypes, a = 5.50, c = 14.25 Å, space groups P63cm (2H1), P63 (2H2). In addition, several six-layer (a = 5.49, c = 42.80 Å), mostly non-MDO polytypes were separated from allotwins by cleaving. In order to identify them, 24 possible stacking sequences were modeled, diffraction patterns calculated, graphical identification diagrams constructed, and comparisons made with actual RS sections. This simulation revealed that five pairs of sequences provided identical diffraction patterns. Polytypes actually found correspond to the following sequences: 1 (6T1), 5 (proposed Ramsdell’s symbol 6T3), 8+10 (6T5), 11+12 (6T4), 24 (6T6, trigonal polytypes, space group type P3), 22 (6R1), and 23 (6R2, rhombohedral polytypes, space group type R3c and R3, respectively). The RS section corresponding to the hexagonal polytype 6H2 (sequence 14) was also found. However, diffraction patterns geometrically indistinguishable can be produced by the twin with rotation by 180° about chex as a twin operation of the rhombohedral polytype 6R2 (sequence 23). Several aggregates with fiber texture of polytype 2H2 were separated from the central part. Use of EPMA-WDS revealed Fe and Si along with significant amounts of Mn and Mg. Crystals from veins were more Mn- and Mg-rich than these from the central part. Traces of Cl, S, and Al are present also.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agard, J. (1966). Données nouvelles sur le district fluorifère d'El Hammam-Berkamène (Maroc Central). Rapport Service d'Etude des Gîtes Minéraux, no 843, Rabat.Google Scholar
Aissa, M. (1997). Etude des interactions fluides minéraux des skarns à Sn, W, B d'El Hammam (Maroc central). Facteurs physicochimiques contrôlant le développement du stade stannifère. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat, Université Moulay Ismail, Meknès.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. W. (1969). Polytypism of trioctahedral 1: 1 layer silicates. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17, 355371. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1969.0170605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S.W. (1988). Polytypism of 1: 1 layer silicates. In: Bailey, S.W. (ed.) Hydrous Phyllosilicates (Exclusive of Micas) (pp. 127). Reviews in Mineralogy, 19, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Banfield, J. F., Bailey, S. W., Barker, W. W., & Smith II, R. C. (1995). Complex polytypism: Relations between serpentine structural characteristic and deformations. American Mineralogist, 80, 11161131. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1995-11-1203Google Scholar
Chbihi, A., & Gmira, A. (1998). La fluorine au Maroc: cas de la mine d'El Hammam Chronique de la recherche minière, 531–532, 117126.Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, K. (1964). Grundzüge einer Theorie der OD-Strukturen aus Schichten. Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissechschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Chemie, Geologie und Biologie, 3, 107 (in German).Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, K. (1982). Geometrical properties of MDO polytypes and procedures for their derivations. I. General concept and application to polytype families consisting of OD layers all of the same kind. Acta Crystallographica, A38, 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739482001041Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, K., & Ďurovič, S. (1975a). OD-interpretation of kaolinite-type structures – I: Symmetry of kaolinite packets and their stacking possibilities. Clays and Clay Minerals, 23, 219229. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230310Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, K., & Ďurovič, S. (1975b). OD-interpretation of kaolinite-type structures – II: The regular polytypes (MDO-polytypes) and their derivation. Clays and Clay Minerals, 23, 231246. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230311Google Scholar
Ďurovič, S. (1981). OD-Charakter, Polytypie und Identifikation von Schichtsilikaten. Fortschritte der Mineralogie, 59, 191226 (in German).Google Scholar
Ďurovič, S. (1997a). Fundamentals of the OD theory. In Merlino, S. (ed.) Modular Aspects of Minerals (pp. 128). EMU Notes in Mineralogy, Vol. 1. Eötvös University PressGoogle Scholar
Ďurovič, S. (1997b). Cronstedtite-1Mand coexistence of 1M and 3T polytypes. Ceramics-Silikáty, 41, 98104.Google Scholar
Ferraris, G., Makovicky, E., & Merlino, S. (2008). Crystallography of Modular Materials (370 pp). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frondel, C. (1962). Polytypism in cronstedtite. American Mineralogist, 47, 781783.Google Scholar
Geiger, C. A., Henry, D. L., Bailey, S. W., & Maj, J. J. (1983). Crystal structure of cronstedtite-2H 2. Clays and Clay Minerals, 31, 97108. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1983.0310203Google Scholar
Grell, H., & Dornberger-Schiff, K. (1982). Symbols for OD groupoid families referring to OD structures (polytypes) consisting of more than one kind of layer. Acta Crystallographica, A38, 4954.10.1107/S0567739482000096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. H., & Bailey, S. W. (1976). Amesite from Antarctica. American Mineralogist, 61, 497499.Google Scholar
Hall, S. H., Guggenheim, S., Moore, P., & Bailey, S. W. (1976). The structure of Unst-type 6-layer polytype. The Canadian Mineralogist, 14, 314321.Google Scholar
Hybler, J. (2014). Refinement of cronstedtite-1M. Acta Crystallographica, B70, 963972. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520614020897Google Scholar
Hybler, J. (2016). Crystal structure of cronstedtite-6T 2, a non-MDO polytype. European Journal of Mineralogy, 28, 777788. https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2016/0028-2541Google Scholar
Hybler, J., & Sejkora, J. (2017). Polytypism of cronstedtite from Chyňava, Czech Republic. Journal of Geosciences, 62, 137146. https://doi.org/10.3190/jgeosci.239Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Petříček, V., Ďurovič, S., & Smrčok, L. (2000). Refinement of the crystal structure of cronstedtite-1T. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 331338. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2000.0480304Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Petříček, V., Fábry, J., & Ďurovič, S. (2002). Refinement of the crystal structure of cronstedtite-2H2. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 601613. https://doi.org/10.1346/000986002320679332Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Sejkora, J., & Venclík, V. (2016). Polytypism of cronstedtite from Pohled, Czech Republic. European Journal of Mineralogy, 28, 765775. https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2016/0028-2532Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Števko, M., & Sejkora, J. (2017). Polytypism of cronstedtite from Nižná Slaná, Slovakia. European Journal of Mineralogy, 29, 9199. https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2017/0029-2582Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Klementová, M., Jarošová, M., Pignatelli, I., Mosser-Ruck, R., & Ďurovič, S. (2018). Polytypes identification in trioctahedral layer silicates by electron diffraction and application to cronstedtite mineral synthetized by iron-clay interaction. Clays and Clay Minerals, 66, 379402. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2018.064106Google Scholar
Hybler, J., Dolnícek, Z., Sejkora, J., & Števko, M. (2020). Polytypism of cronstedtite from Nagybörzsöny, Hungary. Clays and Clay Minerals, 68, 632645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42860-020-00102-9Google Scholar
International tables for crystallography Vol. E, 2-nd edition, Subperiodic groups (2010). Kopský, V., & Litvin, D. B. (ed.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 576 pp.Google Scholar
Izart, A., Chevremont, P., Tahiri, A., El Boursoumi, A., & Thieblemont, D. (2001). Carte Géologique du Maroc au 1/50.000: Feuille de Bouqachmir. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc, 411 bis, Rabat.Google Scholar
Jébrak, M. (1985). Contribution à l'histoire naturelle des filons F-Ba du domaine varisque. Essai de caractérisation structurale et géochimique des filons en extension et en décrochements. Massifs centraux français et marocains. Documents BRGM, Orléans 99.Google Scholar
Kogure, T., Hybler, J., & Ďurovič, S. (2001). A HRTEM study of cronstedtite: Determination of polytypes and layer polarity in trioctahedral 1: 1 phyllosilicates. Clays and Clay Minerals, 49, 310317. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490405Google Scholar
Mahjoubi, E. M., Chauvet, A., Badra, L., Sizaret, S., Barbanson, L., El Maz, A., Chen, Y., & Amann, M. (2015). Structural, mineralogical, and paleoflow velocity constraints on Hercynian tin mineralization: the Achmmach prospect of the Moroccan Central Massif Mineralium Deposita, 51, 431451.Google Scholar
Mikloš, D. (1975). Symmetry and polytypism of trioctahedral kaolin-type minerals. Ph.D. thesis. Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia 144 pp. (in Slovak).Google Scholar
Nespolo, M., Kogure, T., & Ferraris, G. (1999). Allotwinning: oriented crystal association of polytypes – some warnings on consequences. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 214, 58.Google Scholar
Pignatelli, I., Mugnaioli, E., Hybler, J., Mosser-Ruck, R., Cathelineau, M., & Michau, N. (2013). A multi-technique characterization of cronstedtite synthesized by iron-clay interaction in a step-by-step cooling procedure. Clays and Clay Minerals, 61, 277289. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610408Google Scholar
Pignatelli, I., Marrochi, Y., Vacher, L. G., Delon, R., & Gounelle, M. (2016). Multiple precursors of secondary mineralogical assemblages in CM chondrites. Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 51-4, 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignatelli, I., Marrocchi, Y., Mugnaioli, E., Bourdelle, F., & Gounelle, M. (2017). Mineralogical, crystallographic and redox features of the earliest stages of fluid alteration in CM chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 209, 106122.10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignatelli, I., Mugnaioli, E., & Marrocchi, Y. (2018). Cronstedtite polytypes in the Paris meteorite. European Journal of Mineralogy, 30, 349354. https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2018/0030-2713Google Scholar
Pignatelli, I., Mosser-Ruck, R., Mugnaioli, E., Sterpenich, J., & Gemmi, M. (2020). The effect of the starting mineralogical mixture on the nature of Fe serpentines obtained during hydrothermal syntheses at 90°C. Clays and Clay Minerals, 68, 394412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42860-020-00080-yGoogle Scholar
Pouchou, J. L., & Pichoir, F. (1985). ‘PAP’ (φρZ) procedure for improved quantitative microanalysis. In Armstrong, J. T. (Ed.), Microbeam Analysis (pp. 104106). San Francisco Press.Google Scholar
Rigaku Oxford Diffraction (2018). CrysAlisPro, version 171.40.35a, Data collection and data reduction GUI.Google Scholar
Smrčok, L., & Weiss, Z. (1993). DIFK91: a program for the modelling of powder diffraction patterns on a PC. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 26, 140141. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892008070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smrčok, L., Ďurovič, S., Petříček, V., & Weiss, Z. (1994). Refinement of the crystal structure of cronstedtite-3T. Clays and Clay Minerals, 42, 544551. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1994.0420505Google Scholar
Sonnet, P. M. (1981). Burtite, calcium hexahydrostannate, a new mineral from El Hamman, central Morocco. The Canadian Mineralogist, 19, 397401.Google Scholar
Steadman, R. (1964). The structure of trioctahedral kaolin-type silicates. Acta Crystallographica, 17, 924927. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X64002390Google Scholar
Steadman, R., & Nuttall, P. M. (1962). The crystal structure of amesite. Acta Crystallographica, 15, 510511. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X62001267Google Scholar
Steadman, R., & Nuttall, P. M. (1963). Polymorphism in cronstedtite. Acta Crystallographica, 16, 18. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X63000013Google Scholar
Steadman, R., & Nuttall, P. M. (1964). Further polymorphism in cronstedtite. Acta Crystallographica, 17, 404406. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X64000913Google Scholar
Steinmann, J. J. (1820). Chemische Untersuchung des Cronstedtit's, eines neuen Fossils von Príbram in Böhmen (p. 47). Gottlieb Haase (in German).Google Scholar
Steinmann, J. J. (1821). Chemische Untersuchung des Cronstedtit's, eines neuen Fossils von Příbram in Böhmen. Journal für Chemie und Physik, 32, 69100 (in German).Google Scholar
Vrba, K. (1886). Vorläufige Notiz über den Cronstedtit von Kuttenberg. Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Böhmischen Gesselschaft der Wissenschaften, 3, 1319 (in German).Google Scholar
Wahle, M. W., Bujnowski, T. J., Guggenheim, S., & Kogure, T. (2010). Guidottiite, the Mn-analogue of cronstedtite: A new serpentine-group mineral from South Africa. Clays and Clay Minerals, 58, 364376. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2010.0580307Google Scholar
Weiss, Z., & Kužvart, M. (2005). Clay minerals, their nanostructure and use. (p. 281). Karolinum publishing house (in Czech).Google Scholar
Wicks, F. J., & Whittaker, E. J. W. (1975). A reappraisal of the structures of the serpentine minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 13, 227243.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hybler et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 560.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hybler et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 455 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hybler et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 765.3 KB