Skip to main content

Inequality, Fragmentation, and Belonging: John Berger on Migrant Labour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 506 Accesses

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

Abstract

John Berger’s 1975 study of migrant labour, A Seventh Man, is an example of the enduring relevance of a Marxist approach to migration. Berger’s analysis is rooted in Marxist concepts of alienation and ideological mystification, expanded through three further concepts: the naturalization of an unequal hierarchy of labours; the fragmentation of the worker into a bundle of capacities and needs that both underpins and is reinforced by this inequality; the mystified idea of belonging, in which migrant workers do not belong where they work and exist. Berger’s Marxist approach is contrasted with the “methodological nationalism” characteristic of liberal political philosophy and Hannah Arendt’s focus on exclusion and statelessness. Approaching the migrant as worker provides a necessary corrective to these approaches, but comparison with Arendt helps clarify Berger’s ideas about how to adequately challenge and overcome inequality by politicizing the status of migrant workers and asserting a radical principle of equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While the book is co-authored by Berger and Mohr, I assume here that Berger is the primary author of the text and so refers to its ideas as his. Britain is ruled out in part by Berger’s decision to focus on migrants from within Europe “in order to define as sharply as possible the new phenomenon of millions of peasants migrating to countries with which they had no previous connection” (Berger & Mohr, 1975/2010, p. 12). Thus, he ignores migrants from former colonies (who constituted the majority in Britain), acknowledging that “the distinction is an artificial one, but it helps narrow the focus” (Berger & Mohr, 1975/2010, p. 12). A further artificial narrowing is made by his decision to focus entirely on male workers, ignoring the two million women migrant workers, about whom “to write of their experience adequately would require a book itself” (Berger & Mohr, 1975/2010, p. 12).

  2. 2.

    At the same time, the migrant is even more dependent on the employer to meet their immediate needs of reproduction (food, shelter, etc.), often provided on site in barracks and canteens.

  3. 3.

    Marx’s most explicit writings on alienation appear in what have become known as the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, written largely in Paris in 1844 but not published until the 1930s.

  4. 4.

    I focus here on Arendt, but similar points can be made about Giorgio Agamben’s account of “bare life” (see Schaap, 2011).

  5. 5.

    For example, Gündogdu suggests that the concept of stateless covers “not only those who formally lost their nationality but also those who could no longer benefit from their citizenship rights: refugees, asylum seekers, economic immigrants, even naturalized citizens who faced the threat of denaturalization in times of emergency” (2015, p. 2), while Astra Taylor suggests extending it to “citizens, of individuals who are being financially dispossessed through the denial of fundamental rights by an emerging global oligarchy” (DeGooyer et al., 2018, p. X).

  6. 6.

    This has clear affinities with the “differential inclusion” discussed by Papadopoulos and Tsianos (2013, pp. 180–184) in the context of their “autonomy of migration” approach.

  7. 7.

    This would also suggest similarities between Berger’s understanding of equality and Rancière’s, for whom equality is “a mere assumption that needs to be discerned within the practices implementing it” (Rancière, 1999, p. 33).

References

  • Arendt, H. (1979). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt and Brace. (Original work published 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (2012). “I have to turn this prize against itself”—John Berger on accepting the Booker Prize for Fiction, 23 November 1972. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2317-i-have-to-turn-this-prize-against-itself-john-berger-on-accepting-the-booker-prize-for-fiction-23-november-1972 (Original work published 1972)

  • Berger, J., & Mohr, J. (2010). A seventh man. Verso. (Original work published 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buden, B., & Dokuzović, L. (Eds). (2018). They’ll never walk alone: The life and afterlife of Gastarbeiters. Transversal Texts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraus, T., & Paris, E. (Eds.). 2019. Migration, protest movements and the politics of resistance. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGooyer, S., Hunt, A., Maxwell, L., & Moyn, S. (2018). The right to have rights. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S. (2020). Women and work: Feminism labour and social reproduction. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S., & McNally, D. (2014). Precarious migrants: Gender, race and the social reproduction of a global working class. Socialist Register, 2015, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, L. (2020). If this isn’t racism, what is? (pp. 115–139). The politics of the philosophy of immigration. Aristotelian Society Supplementary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündogdu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an age of rights: Hannah Arendt and the contemporary struggles of migrants. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanieh, A. (2015). States of exclusion: Migrant work in the Gulf Arab states. In A. Choudry & M. Hlatshwayo (Eds.), Just work? Migrant workers’ struggles today (pp. 41–60). Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (2020). Decolonizing Anglo-American political philosophy: The case of migration justice (pp. 87–113). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karuka, M. (2019). Empire’s tracks: Indigenous nations. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1974). The civil war in France. In D. Fernbach (Ed.), The first international and after. Political writings: Vol. 3 (pp. 187–235). Penguin. (Original work published 1871)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1975). Economic and philosophical manuscripts (G. Benton, Trans.). In Early writings (pp. 279–400). Penguin. (Original work published 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital Vol. 1 (B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1867)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1988). Letter to Sigfrid Meyer and August Vogt. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Collected works Vol. 43, (pp. 471–476). International Publishers. (Original work published 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlevey, J. (2014). Raising expectations (and raising hell). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, A. (2012). John Berger. Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D., & Tsianos, V. S. (2013). After citizenship: Autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons. Citizenship Studies, 17(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreements. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, A. (2014). Methodological nationalism, migration and political theory. Political Studies, 64(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9248.12167

  • Sager, A. (2019). Reclaiming cosmopolitanism through migrant protests. In T. Caraus & E. Paris (Eds.), Migration, protest movements and the politics of resistance (pp. 171–185). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, A. (2011). Enacting the right to have rights: Jacques Ranciere's critique of Hannah Arendt. European Journal of Political Theory, 10(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1474885110386004

  • Swain, D. (2019). Alienation, or why capitalism is bad for us. In M. Vidal, T. Smith, T. Rotta, & P. Prew (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Karl Marx (pp. 360–378). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ypi, L. (2016). Taking workers as a class: The moral dilemmas of guestworker programs. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in political theory (pp. 151–174). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is an outcome of the project “Towards a New Ontology of Social Cohesion,” grant number GA19-20031S of the Czech Science Agency (GAČR), realized at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences. I am grateful to my project collaborators Petr Kouba and Petr Urban, to the editors of this volume, and also to Mark Bergfeld, Joe Grim Feinberg, and Lorna Finlayson for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Swain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Swain, D. (2022). Inequality, Fragmentation, and Belonging: John Berger on Migrant Labour. In: Ritchie, G., Carpenter, S., Mojab, S. (eds) Marxism and Migration. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98839-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics