Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022; 89(2):121-128 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2022/018

Repeated Sterilization of Articular Components of Joint Replacements with Ethylene Oxide Does Not Affect the Structure and Properties of UHMWPEOriginal papers

P. FULÍN1,*, M. ©LOUF2, V. GAJDO©OVÁ2, P. NĚMEČEK2, S. KREJČÍKOVÁ2, D. POKORNÝ1
1 l. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
2 Ústav makromolekulární chemie Akademie věd České republiky, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
In clinical practice UHMWPE is the most commonly used material for manufacturing articular components of joint replacements. The purpose of this study is to find out whether repeated ethylene oxide sterilization results in oxidative degradation of UHMWPE or not and also whether the oxidative degradation of various types of ethylene oxide-sterilized UHMWPE depends on storage time or not.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The set included 12 samples of UHMWPE (three samples with different modifications (virgin PE, with E vitamin and cross-linked with thermal treatment) and different number of sterilizations (0×-3×)). The set also included 8 samples of commercial components of hip or knee replacements sterilized with ethylene oxide and stored for different storage periods. The oxidative degradation was assessed by infrared microspectroscopy, based on which the oxidation index (OI), trans-vinylene index (VI), crystallinity index (CI) and E vitamin index (EI) were calculated. Mechanical properties of UHMWPE were obtained through microhardness measurements. Statistical processing of the results was performed.

RESULTS:
In all the samples, very low oxidative degradation values were reported (most OI values < 0.1). All radiation crosslinked UHMWPE samples showed an increased VI index and a slightly lower crystallinity index. All unmodified samples (irrespective of whether or not and how many times or how long ago the samples were sterilized with EtO) had almost zero value of VI. Changes in crystallinity were negligible (in the rage of 0.56-0.63), which required very accurate measurements of micromechanical properties. Yet, linear correlation was established between microhardness and crystallinity.

DISCUSSION:
All the mentioned indices changed as anticipated: OIs were very low and slightly increased with time of storage, VIs of radiation crosslinked samples grew in proportion to the total gama radiation dose, CIs decreased in samples thermally treated by remelting, and EIs were very low due to negligible concentration of stabiliser (0.1%) in the samples of medical grade UHMWPE.

CONCLUSIONS:
All samples showed zero or minimum oxidative degradation. This confirmed that neither ethylene oxide sterilization, nor multiple EtO sterilization or longer storage of polymer after ethylene oxide sterilization result in major oxidative degradation.

Keywords: UHMWPE, ethylene oxide, sterilization, oxidation, infrared spectroscopy, microhardness

Published: April 15, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
FULÍN P, ©LOUF M, GAJDO©OVÁ V, NĚMEČEK P, KREJČÍKOVÁ S, POKORNÝ D. Repeated Sterilization of Articular Components of Joint Replacements with Ethylene Oxide Does Not Affect the Structure and Properties of UHMWPE. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech.. 2022;89(2):121-128. doi: 10.55095/achot2022/018. PubMed PMID: 35621402.
Download citation

References

  1. AOANJRR 2018. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2018. Annual report, dostupné z https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/576950/Hip%2C%20Knee%20%26%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty.
  2. Alhassan S, Goswani T. Wear rate model for UHMWPE in total joint application. Wear. 2008;265:8-13. Go to original source...
  3. Baltá Calleja FJ, Fakirov S. Microhardness of polymers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. Go to original source...
  4. Bracco P, Bellare A, Bistolfi A, Affafato S. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: influence of the chemical, physical and mechanical properties on the wear behavior. A review. Materials. 2017;10:791, doi:10.3390/ma10070791 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Flores A, Ania F, Balta-Calleja FJ. From the glassy state to ordered polymer structures: a microhardness study. Polymer. 2009;50:729-746. Go to original source...
  6. Fulín P, Pokorný D, ©louf M, Nevoralová M, Vacková T, Dybal J, Kaspříková N, Landor I. Analýza oxidačního poąkození explantovaných komponenet náhrady kyčelního kloubu Beznoska/Poldi. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83:155-162. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fulín P, Pokorný D, ©louf M, Nevoralová M, Vacková T, Dybal J, Sosna A. Effect of sterilisation with formaldehyde, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide on the properties of polyethylene joint replacement components. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81:33-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Charnley J, Halley DK. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1975;112: 170-179. Go to original source...
  9. Kurtz SM. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook, 3rd ed. Elsevier Inc., New York, 2016.
  10. Lednicky F, Slouf M, Kratochvil J, Baldrian J, Novotna D. Crystalline character and microhardness of gamma-irradiated and thermally treated UHMWPE. J Macromol Sci Phys B. 2007;46:521-531. Go to original source...
  11. Medel FJ, Rimnac CM, Kurtz SM. On the assessment of oxidative and microstructural changes after in vivo degradation of historical UHMWPE knee components by means of vibrational spectroscopies and nanoindentation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;9:530-538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Nevoralova M, Slouf M, Dybal J, Kredatusova J, Fulin P, Pokorny D. Mikroskopická analýza oxidativní degradace polyethylenových komponent kloubních náhrad. Chem Listy. 2015;109:395-400.
  13. Slouf M, Arevalo S, Vlkova H, Gajdosova V, Kralik V, Pruitt L. Comparison of macro-, micro- and nanomechanical properties of clinically-relevant UHMWPE formulations. J Mech Behav iomed Mater. 2021;120:104205. doi: j.jmbbm.2020.104205 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Slouf M, Krejcikova S, Hromadkova J. Relationship among molecular structure, supermolecular structure and micromechanical properties of semicrystalline polymers. Chem Listy. 2017;111:239-245.
  15. Slouf M, Mikesova J. Fencl J, Synkova H, Baldrian J, Horak Z. Impact of dose-rate on rheology, structure and wear of irradiated UHMWPE. J Macromol Sci Phys B. 2009;48:587-603. Go to original source...
  16. Slouf M, Pavlova E, Krejcikova S, Ostafinska A, Zhigunov A, Krzyzanek V, Sowinski P, Piorkowska E. Relationship between morphology and micromechanical properties of alpha, beta and gamma phases of iPP. Polym Test. 2018;67:522-532. Go to original source...
  17. Slouf M, Synkova H, Baldrian J, Marek A, Kovarova J, Schmidt P, Dorschner H, Stephan M, Gohs U. Structural changes of UHMWPE after e-beam irradiation and thermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85:240-251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Slouf M, Vackova T, Nevoralova M, Pokorny D. Micromechanical properties of one-step and sequentially crosslinked UHMWPEs for total joint replacements. Polym Test. 2015;41:191-197. Go to original source...
  19. Urdan TC. Statistics in plain English. 4th ed. Taylor & Francis, New York, 2017.
  20. VanderPlas J. Python data science handbook. O' Reilly, Boston, 2017.