Skip to main content

Backtracking Based k-SAT Algorithms

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 278 Accesses

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

2005; Paturi, Pudlák, Saks, Zane

Problem Definition

Determination of the complexity of k-CNF satisfiability is a celebrated open problem: given a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form with at most k literals per clause, find an assignment to the variables that satisfies each of the clauses or declare none exists. It is well known that the decision problem of k-CNF satisfiability is NP-complete for k ≥ 3. This entry is concerned with algorithms that significantly improve the worst-case running time of the naive exhaustive search algorithm, which is poly(n)2n for a formula on n variables. Monien and Speckenmeyer [8] gave the first real improvement by giving a simple algorithm whose running time is \(O(2_{k}^{(1-\upvarepsilon )n})\), with \(\upvarepsilon _{k}> 0\) for all k. In a sequence of results [1, 3, 57, 912], algorithms with increasingly better running times (larger values of \(\upvarepsilon _{k}\)) have been proposed and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Recommended Reading

  1. Baumer S, Schuler R (2003) Improving a probabilistic 3-SAT algorithm by dynamic search and independent clause pairs. In: SAT, Santa Margherita Ligure, pp 150–161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calabro C, Impagliazzo R, Kabanets V, Paturi R (2003) The complexity of unique k-SAT: an isolation lemma for k-CNFs. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth IEEE conference on computational complexity, Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dantsin E, Goerdt A, Hirsch EA, Kannan R, Kleinberg J, Papadimitriou C, Raghavan P, Schöning U (2002) A deterministic \((2 - \frac{2} {k+1})^{n}\) algorithm for k-SAT based on local search. Theor Comp Sci 289(1):69–83

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis M, Logemann G, Loveland D (1962) A machine program for theorem proving. Commun ACM 5:394–397

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmeister T, Schöning U, Schuler R, Watanabe O (2002) A probabilistic 3-SAT algorithm further improved. In: STACS, Antibes Juan-les-Pins. LNCS, vol 2285, Springer, Berlin, pp 192–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwama K, Tamaki S (2004) Improved upper bounds for 3-SAT. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, New Orleans, pp 328–329

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kullmann O (1999) New methods for 3-SAT decision and worst-case analysis. Theor Comp Sci 223(1–2):1–72

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Monien B, Speckenmeyer E (1985) Solving satisfiability in less than 2 n steps. Discret Appl Math 10:287–295

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Paturi R, Pudlák P, Saks M, Zane F (2005) An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT. J ACM 52(3):337–364. (An earlier version presented in Proceedings of the 39th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, 1998, pp 628–637)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paturi R, Pudlák P, Zane F (1999) Satisfiability Coding Lemma. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, Miami Beach, 1997, pp. 566–574. Chicago J Theor Comput Sci. http://cjtcs.cs.uchicago.edu/

  11. Rolf D (2003) 3-SAT ∈ RTIME (1. 32971n). In: ECCC TR03-054

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schöning U (2002) A probabilistic algorithm for k-SAT based on limited local search and restart. Algorithmica 32:615–623. (An earlier version appeared in 40th annual symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS ’99), pp 410–414)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramamohan Paturi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Paturi, R., Pudlák, P., Saks, M., Zane, F. (2015). Backtracking Based k-SAT Algorithms. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8_45-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8_45-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27848-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics