Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing geophysical signature of a hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using geoelectrical surveys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In February 1994, a major oil blow-out occurred as a consequence of an accident at an exploration drill-hole at Trecate (North-West, Italy). More than 15 years after the incident, a series of geophysical and hydrogeological surveys were conducted for investigating the hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. The hydrocarbon is still spatially distributed as residual phase in the unsaturated zone. A free phase exists between the transition zone and the vadose zone, in what is defined as a smear zone. Geoelectrical methods have shown their potential in contaminant detection, and are increasingly used for contaminated sites characterization. We carried out geoelectrical surveys over the most contaminated area of the site, in order to analyze the changes in geophysical signature due to the presence of contaminants, and furthermore to understand the role of biomass activity in degrading the hydrocarbon and altering petrophysical properties of the soil. Acquisition of time- and frequency-domain resistivity data allowed us to approach the same features with different methods, providing a better understanding of the problem. We further analyzed the role of soil properties on electrical resistivity; porosity, pore water specific resistivity and the influence of cation exchange capacity on the bulk resistivity at the site. The electrical resistivity observed at the site shows a clear relationship with water saturation, porosity and soil texture as well as with resistive hydrocarbon species. We also monitored soil polarizability in the same frequency range of electrical resistivity measures, allowing better delineation of the degrading processes underway in the contaminant, which constitutes an additional substrate for the proliferation of anaerobic degraders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel Aal GZ, Atekwana EA, Slater LD, Atekwana EA (2004) Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments. Geophys Res Lett, 31 (12)

  • Allen JP, Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA, Duris JW, Werkema DD, Rossbach S (2007) The microbial community structure in petroleum-contaminated sediments corresponds to geophysical signatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(9):2860–2870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arato A, Wehrer M, Biró B, Godio A (2013) Integration of geophysical, geochemical and microbiological data for a comprehensive small-scale characterization of an aged LNAPL-contaminated site. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2171-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA (2010) Geophysical signatures of microbial activity at hydrocarbon contaminated sites: a review. Surv Geophys 31(2):247–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atekwana EA, Sauck WA, Werkema DD Jr (2000) Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at hydrocarbon contaminated site. J Appl Geophys 44:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batayneh AT (2005) Electrical imaging of an LNAPL contamination, Al Amiriyya fuel station, Jordan. J Appl Sci 5(1):52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson AK, Payne KL, Stubben MA (1997) Mapping groundwater contamination using DC resistivity and VLF geophysical methods-A case study. Geophysics 62(1):80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binley A (2011) Changes to R2 from v2. 7

  • Blume E et al (2002) 2002 Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Appl Soil Ecol 20(3):171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiani G, Binley A, Kemna A, Wehrer M, Flores Orozco A, Deiana R, Boaga J, Rossi M, Dietrich P, Werban U, Zschornack L, Godio A, JafarGandomi A, Deidda GP (2014) Non-invasive characterization of the Trecate (Italy) crude-oil contaminated site: links between contamination and geophysical signals. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-2494-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy DP et al (2001) The effects of LNAPL biodegradation products on electrical conductivity measurements. J Environ Eng Geophys 6(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan S, Toumelin E, Torres-Verdín C, Thomas EC, Petrophysics B (2006) Pore-scale analysis of the Waxman-Smits shaly sand conductivity model. In: SPWLA 47th annual logging symposium, pp 1–9

  • Frohlich RK, Barosh PJ, Boving T (2008) Investigating changes of electrical characteristics of the saturated zone affected by hazardous organic waste. J Appl Geophys 64(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godio A, Naldi M (2003) Two-dimensional electrical imaging for detection of hydrocarbon contaminants. Near Surface Geophys 1(3):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Godio A, Naldi M (2009) Integration of electrical and electromagnetic investigation for contaminated site. Am J Environ Sci 5(4):562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godio A, Arato A, Stocco S (2010) Geophysical characterization of a nonaqueous-phase liquid–contaminated site. Environ Geosci 17(4):141–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemna A, Räkers E, Binley A (1997) Application of complex resistivity tomography to field data from a kerosene-contaminated site. In: 3rd EEGS Meeting

  • Newmark RL, Daily WL, Ramirez AL (1999) Electrical resistance tomography using steel cased boreholes as electrodes. In: 1999 SEG Annual Meeting

  • Sauck WA (1998) A conceptual model for the geoelectrical response of LNAPL plumes in granular sediments. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems. pp 805–817

  • Slater et al (2007) Porescale spectral induced polarization signatures associated with FeS biomineral transformations. Geophys Res Lett 34:L21404. doi:10.1029/2007GL031840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogade JA, Scira-Scappuzzo F, Vichabian Y, Shi Weiqun, Rodi W, Lesmes DP, Morgan FD (2006) Induced-polarization detection and mapping of contaminant plumes. Geophysics 71:B75–B84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezkan B, Georgescu P, Fauzi U (2005) A radiomagnetotelluric survey on an oil-contaminated area near the Brazi Refinery Romania. Geophys Prospect 53(3):311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman MH, Smith LJM (1968) Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands. Soc Petroleum Eng J 8:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was performed as a part of the SOILCAM project (www.soilcam.eu), funded by 7th framework program for the call ENV.2007.3.1.2.2 by the European community. The authors would like to thank Diego Franco for helping in data acquisition. Our special thanks go to the reviewers and the editor for their reviews and helping comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvester Koroma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koroma, S., Arato, A. & Godio, A. Analyzing geophysical signature of a hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using geoelectrical surveys. Environ Earth Sci 74, 2937–2948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4326-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4326-6

Keywords

Navigation