A publishing partnership

Hot Subdwarf Stars Identified in Gaia DR2 with Spectra of LAMOST DR6 and DR7. I. Single-lined Spectra

, , , and

Published 2020 January 30 © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Zhenxin Lei et al 2020 ApJ 889 117 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab660a

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/889/2/117

Abstract

182 single-lined hot subdwarf stars are identified by using spectra from the sixth and seventh data releases (DR6 and DR7) of the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fibre Spectroscopic Telescope survey. We classified all the hot subdwarf stars using a canonical classification scheme, and got 89 sdB, 37 sdOB, 26 sdO, 24 He-sdOB, 3 He-sdO, and 3 He-sdB stars, respectively. Among these stars, 108 hot subdwarfs are newly discovered, while 74 stars were reported by previous catalogs. The atmospheric parameters of these stars were obtained by fitting the hydrogen (H) and helium (He) lines with non-local thermodynamic equilibrium model atmospheres. The atmospheric parameters confirm the two He sequences and the two subgroups of He-sdOB stars in our samples, which were found by previous studies in the Teff$\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ diagram. Our results demonstrate different origins of field hot subdwarf stars and extreme horizontal branch stars in globular clusters, and provide strict observational limits on the formation and evolution models of the different sub-types of these evolved objects. Based on the results, we evaluated the completeness of the Geier et al. catalog. We found the fraction of hot subwarf stars is between 10% and 60%, depending on the brightness of the sample. A more accurate estimation for the hot subdwarf fraction can be obtained when similar results from composite spectra will become available.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Hot subdwarf stars (i.e., sdO/B) are evolved low-mass stars around 0.5 ${M}_{\odot }$. They show similar spectra to main-sequence (MS) stars of O/B type, but at lower luminosity and with broader spectral features. These hot stars occupy the extreme blue region of horizontal branch (HB) in the Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram and burn He in their cores, therefore, they are also known as extreme horizontal branch (EHB) stars (Heber 1986).

The formation and evolution of hot subdwarf stars are still not clear. To end up on the EHB, the progenitors of these hot stars have to lose nearly the whole envelope mass by the end of their red giant branch stages. Therefore, binary evolution is thought to be the main formation mechanism for hot subdwarf stars (Han et al. 2002, 2003). On the observational side, about half of the hot subdwarfs are found in close binaries (Maxted et al. 2001; Napiwotzki et al. 2004; Copperwheat et al. 2011), and their companions could be brown dwarfs, MS stars, white dwarfs (WDs), and even neutron stars or black holes (Kawka et al. 2015; Kupfer et al. 2015). Studies on hot subdwarf stars therefore can shed light on the details of binary evolution processes, such as Roche lobe overflow, common envelope ejection, and the merger of two He WDs (Han et al. 2002, 2003; Zhang & Jeffery 2012; Chen et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2017; Vos et al. 2019). Moreover, close hot subdwarf binaries with compact companions (e.g., WDs, neutron stars, or black holes) are potential verification sources (Kupfer et al. 2018) for the future space-based gravitational wave detectors, such as LISA (Amaro-Seoane et al. 2017) and TianQin (Luo et al. 2016a). Close hot subdwarf + massive WD binaries are possible progenitor systems for SNe Ia, in which the hot subdwarf companion may survive the explosion as a hypervelocity remnant (Wang et al. 2009; Vennes et al. 2017; Li et al. 2018; Raddi et al. 2019).

Pulsating sdO/B stars allow the accurate determination of mass and internal structure by using asteroseismic methods, which provide excellent tests for the formation and evolution models (Kawaler et al. 2010; Charpinet et al. 2011; Baran et al. 2012; Battich et al. 2018; Zong et al. 2018). The diversity of atmospheres in hot subdwarf stars makes them good samples to study atomic diffusion processes (Naslim et al. 2013, 2020; Moehler et al. 2014; Jeffery et al. 2017; Németh 2017; Byrne et al. 2018). In addition, hot subdwarf stars in globular clusters provide useful information to understand the formation and evolution of the oldest populations in our galaxy (Latour et al. 2014, 2018; Lei et al. 2015, 2016). For recent reviews on these special stars see Heber (2009, 2016).

Since Kilkenny et al. (1988) published the first catalog of 1225 spectroscopically identified hot subdwarf stars, the number of these special blue objects exploded with the data release of many spectroscopic surveys, such as the Hamburg Quasar Survey (HS; Hagen et al. 1995), the Hamburg ESO survey (HE; Wisotzki et al. 1996), the Edinburgh-Cape Survey (EC; Kilkenny et al. 1997), the Byurakan surveys (FBS, SBS; Mickaelian et al. 2007; Mickaelian 2008), the Galaxy Evolution Explorer all sky survey (Vennes et al. 2011; Németh et al. 2012), the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Geier et al. 2015; Kepler et al. 2015, 2016) and the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fibre Spectroscopic Telescope survey (LAMOST; Luo et al. 2016b, 2019; Bu et al. 2017, 2019; Lei et al. 2018, 2019a, 2019b).

By retrieving known hot subdwarfs and candidates from the literature and unpublished databases, Geier et al. (2017) compiled a hot subdwarf catalog with 5613 objects. This catalog provides much useful stellar information, such as multi-band photometry, proper motions, classifications, atmospheric parameters, etc. The second data release of the Gaia mission (Gaia DR2; Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018) brought us excellent opportunities to discover new hot subdwarf stars, because it provides accurate positions, photometry, parallax, and proper motions. With this information, one can easily compile a large sample of hot subdwarf candidates with high confidence in the HR diagram. Using this method, Geier et al. (2019) compiled a list of 39,800 hot subdwarf candidates selected from Gaia DR2, which is the largest collection ever published. This catalog can be used as a good input target list for follow-up spectroscopic analyses.

In this paper, we analyzed the single-lined spectra that were selected by cross-matching the catalog of Geier et al. (2019) with the latest data release of the LAMOST survey, i.e., DR6 and DR7. By employing non-Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (non-LTE) model atmospheres, we obtained their atmospheric parameters (e.g., effective temperatures, surface gravity values, and He abundance). We also found many composite spectra in the sample, and will report the analysis and results in a forthcoming paper. The structure of this paper is the following: in Section 2, we introduced the hot subdwarf candidates catalog and the databases of LAMOST DR6 and DR7, and how the candidate spectra were selected. The method of spectral analysis and classification for hot subdwarf stars are described in Section 3. We give our results in Section 4. We finish the paper with a brief discussion and summary in Section 5.

2. Target selection

2.1. The Hot Subdwarf Candidate Catalog

Geier et al. (2019) compiled a catalog of hot subdwarf candidates from Gaia DR2, in which 39,800 candidates were selected by means of color, absolute magnitude, and reduced proper motion cuts. Figure 1 shows the selected candidates (red dots) by Geier et al. (2019) in the Gaia DR2 HR diagram (the figure is taken from Figure 3 of Geier et al. 2019, for the detailed candidate selection filter please see Section 3 in their study). The majority of the candidates are expected to be hot subdwarf stars of spectral type B and O, followed by blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars, hot post-AGB stars, and central stars of planetary nebulae.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Hot subdwarf candidates (red dots) in the Gaia DR2 HR diagram. The figure is taken from Geier et al. (2019).

Standard image High-resolution image

2.2. The LAMOST DR6 and DR7 Database

LAMOST is a Chinese national scientific research facility operated by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences. It has a specially designed Schmidt telescope with 4000 fibers in a field of view of 20 deg2 in the sky (Zhao et al. 2006, 2012; Cui et al. 2012). LAMOST finished its pilot survey in June 2012 and the first-six-years regular survey in 2018 July, respectively. The data from both surveys make up the sixth data release (DR6) of LAMOST, in which 9919,106 spectra have been obtained in the optical band (e.g., 3690–9100 $\mathring{\rm A} $) with a resolution of 1800 at 5500 $\mathring{\rm A} $. LAMOST DR6 contains 8966,416 stellar spectra, 172,866 galaxy spectra, 60,173 quasar spectra, and 719,651 spectra of unknown objects, respectively. The data obtained in the pilot survey and the first-five-years regular survey (ended in 2017 July) make up the LAMOST DR5 database. The LAMOST DR6 database contains the whole LAMOST DR5 database and new observational data from the sixth year survey (i.e., 889,947 spectra, observed from 2017 September to 2018 July).

The LAMOST seventh year survey has also been completed (e.g., from 2018 September to 2019 July). The 558,412 low resolution (e.g., $\lambda /\delta \lambda =1800$) spectra observed during this period are released as LAMOST DR7_v0 database. Though the final version of the LAMOST DR7 database, which consists of the whole DR6 database and the new spectra observed during the seventh year survey, will be publicly available on March 2020; all the new spectra observed during this period are already included in the LAMOST DR7_v0 database.

2.3. Hot Subdwarf Candidates Selected by Cross-matching the Geier et al. (2019) Catalog with LAMOST DR6 and DR7

In our previous work, we have already identified 682 hot subdwarf stars by combining the Gaia DR2 database and the LAMOST DR5 database (Lei et al. 2018, 2019b), among which 241 stars were newly discovered. In this study, we analyzed hot subdwarf candidates selected from the LAMOST DR6 and DR7_v0 database. We selected the candidates by the following steps. First, we cross-matched the Geier et al. (2019) catalog with the LAMOST DR6 and DR7_v0 database separately, and obtained 2513 common objects in total. Then, we downloaded all the spectra of the common stars from the LAMOST website (www.lamost.org) and selected 1348 spectra with a signal-to-noise ratio larger than 10 in the u band (S/N-u), which guaranties a sufficient quality for spectral analysis. After removing the spectra that have been analyzed in our previous studies (Lei et al. 2018, 2019a, 2019b), composite spectra,5 and duplicate sources, we finally got 607 spectra that are suitable for spectral analysis.

3. Spectroscopy and Spectral Classification

As in Lei et al. (2018, 2019b), we employed the spectral analysis tool, XTgrid (Németh et al. 2012, 2014) to analyze the selected 607 spectra. XTgrid fits the observed data with synthetic spectra (Synspec version 49; Lanz & Hubeny 2007) calculated from non-LTE model atmospheres (Tlusty version 204; Hubeny & Lanz 2017). The best-fitting model is searched for iteratively with a successive approximation method along the steepest-gradient of the ${\chi }^{2}$ field. Parameter uncertainties have been estimated by mapping the ${\rm{\Delta }}{\chi }^{2}$ field until the 60% confidence level at the given number of free parameters was reached. For the detailed information to obtain the parameter error bars, the readers are suggested to see Figure 2 in Lei et al. (2019b) and the text therein.

The atmospheric parameters of all candidates, such as effective temperature (Teff), surface gravity (log g), and He abundance ($\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$), are obtained by the method described above. Some of the best-fit models for sdOB and sdO stars are shown in Figure 2. As in our previous studies (Lei et al. 2018, 2019b), we identified stars with Teff hotter than 20,000 K and log g larger than 5.0 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$ as hot subdwarf stars. On the other hand, the stars with Teff lower than 20,000 K or log g lower than 5.0 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$ are considered as BHB stars or B type MS (B-MS) stars, while for a few stars with very high Teff and log g (e.g., ${T}_{\mathrm{eff}}\gt 80,000$ K and $\mathrm{log}g\,\gt $ 7 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$), we classified them as WDs. We focus only on hot subdwarf stars in the rest of this paper.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Best-fit models reached by XTgrid for some sdOB (left) and sdO stars (right). The red dashed curves are the best-fitting synthetic spectra, while the black solid curves are the observed spectra. Some important H and He lines in the wavelength range of 3900–5200 $\mathring{\rm A} $ are marked by short vertical lines at the bottom of the panels. The long integers at the right of the panels are the LAMOST ObsID for each observed spectrum. The S/N in the u band for observed spectra increase from bottom to top.

Standard image High-resolution image

We used the spectral classification scheme of Moehler et al. (1990) and Geier et al. (2017) to classify the identified hot subdwarf stars in this study. Stars with dominant H Balmer lines, but weak or absent He lines, are classified as sdB stars. Stars with dominant H Balmer lines and an obvious He ii 4686 $\mathring{\rm A} $ line, but without obvious He i lines are considered as sdO stars. Stars having dominant H Balmer lines, and both weak He i and He ii lines are identified as sdOB stars. Stars with dominant He i lines, but weak or absent H Balmers and He ii lines, we classified as He-sdB stars. Stars presenting strong He ii lines, but with weak or absent H Balmer lines and He i lines are He-sdO stars, while the stars presenting both strong He i and He ii line, but with weak or absent H Balmer lines are classified as He-sdOB stars.

4. Results

From the 607 selected candidates, we identified 182 single-lined hot subdwarf stars, including 89 sdB stars, 37 sdOB stars, 26 sdO stars, 24 He-sdOB stars, 3 He-sdO stars, and 3 He-sdB stars. By cross-matching with the hot subdwarf stars cataloged by Geier et al. (2017), we found 74 common objects. That means we have found 108 new, previously uncataloged hot subdwarf stars and obtained their atmospheric parameters by detailed spectral analysis for the first time.

Table 1 gives the parameters and information for the 182 hot subdwarf stars with single-lined spectra. Columns 1–4 give the R.A., decl., LAMOST_ObsID, and Gaia source_id. Columns 5–7 give the atmospheric parameters fitted by XTgrid, e.g., Teff, log g, and $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$, while columns 8–10 give the S/N in the u band, the apparent Gaia G band magnitudes, and spectral classification. The 74 stars common with the hot subdwarf catalog of Geier et al. (2017) are marked by *.

Table 1.  Information on the 182 Hot Subdwarf Stars Identified in This Study

R.A.a Decl. ObsID source_id Teff $\mathrm{log}\ g$ $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ b S/N-u G spclass
LAMOST LAMOST LAMOST Gaia (K) ($\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$)     Gaia(mag)  
1.8907183* 13.5993244 619614193 2767874292175410560 29560 ± 120 5.41 ± 0.01 −1.90 ± 0.04 103 13.07 sdB
2.1021972 49.083822 593009050 393589879591384576 26640 ± 700 5.53 ± 0.08 −2.61 ± 0.11 17 15.91 sdB
2.7184872 26.5002178 689110148 2850670743266825600 28380 ± 190 5.27 ± 0.02 −2.34 ± 0.09 13 16.98 sdB
2.9364712 46.801838 593007055 392942881419391872 45110 ± 420 5.34 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.23 56 14.37 He-sdOB
4.2165006 52.146517 615603055 395157267782903808 29170 ± 350 5.46 ± 0.06 −2.56 ± 0.15 11 16.81 sdB
4.23055 51.230486 615605186 394991241522199040 32770 ± 460 5.48 ± 0.07 −3.04 ± 0.58 14 16.36 sdB
4.6252262 48.805384 593013047 392840562417338112 24740 ± 140 5.02 ± 0.03 −1.57 ± 0.06 11 15.30 sdB
4.7865313 52.511876 615603207 419143904215897728 51870 ± 5990 5.19 ± 0.30 −1.46 ± 0.14 10 17.16 sdO
5.8632988 51.130463 615605166 394843322846749824 26610 ± 170 5.42 ± 0.03 −2.43 ± 0.06 21 15.95 sdB
6.0352547 56.027472 605908160 421328839978415616 35020 ± 560 5.76 ± 0.13 −1.34 ± 0.10 21 16.18 sdOB
6.1375712 26.8194824 689109217 2856144494402348544 47370 ± 710 5.82 ± 0.11 0.30 ± 0.09 30 16.90 He-sdOB
6.51063* 31.1057 679407014 2862194144817359872 30150 ± 110 5.52 ± 0.08 −2.98> 83 14.87 sdB
7.329288 52.97546 615609066 416403783797286784 36080 ± 490 5.66 ± 0.58 −2.82> 12 16.80 sdB
15.599966 48.879263 353516071 402544091832710272 57260 ± 9490 6.22 ± 0.78 0.66 ± 1.04 28 16.67 He-sdOB
15.866097 32.675987 96304147 314344331362996736 37490 ± 1030 5.43 ± 0.08 −1.69 ± 0.14 14 14.37 sdOB
16.358834 49.928952 686402134 404204083809859584 53250 ± 6940 5.75 ± 0.06 −2.41 ± 0.18 23 16.88 sdO
17.418584 52.819013 686415207 404958378847936000 35330 ± 250 5.90 ± 0.08 −1.47 ± 0.06 14 17.52 sdOB
18.320503 47.191618 603604248 401413450281523584 48680 ± 820 6.06 ± 0.04 −3.21 ± 0.33 114 14.36 sdO
18.553344 52.280484 686415105 404172060533177344 59320 ± 1870 6.05 ± 0.06 −2.97 ± 0.22 31 16.44 sdO
25.858836 32.577683 159006176 305426398708664832 43220 ± 890 5.61 ± 0.15 2.81 ± 0.15 37 15.27 He-sdB
26.668712 41.307165 698114154 347453684494319104 26660 ± 230 5.08 ± 0.03 −0.90 ± 0.04 22 15.83 sdB
28.4816071 18.7996719 613914250 92226691740846080 31800 ± 610 5.85 ± 0.07 −1.62 ± 0.08 10 17.26 sdB
28.953962 41.548932 631015191 345949758745792000 37560 ± 180 5.69 ± 0.03 −3.18> 39 15.74 sdO
31.447815 40.610996 631006045 344794339527216000 33200 ± 420 5.50 ± 0.10 −2.44 ± 0.18 10 17.66 sdB
31.6278862 54.5190312 380704124 456417279675979008 34470 ± 1560 5.13 ± 0.07 −1.56 ± 0.04 105 14.32 sdOB
33.894867 49.427094 618611098 355574058902192768 37420 ± 470 5.91 ± 0.04 −1.47 ± 0.09 16 16.81 sdOB
34.28615 43.681405 615712124 351536441749571200 35940 ± 1350 5.71 ± 0.03 −1.50 ± 0.04 29 15.58 sdOB
35.423212 54.114846 678102180 455558286215251840 27580 ± 330 5.54 ± 0.09 −2.78 ± 0.54 13 16.74 sdB
36.372432* 28.80514 698702181 130950357400044800 36240 ± 710 5.87 ± 0.03 −1.13 ± 0.07 13 17.35 sdOB
37.757164* 27.718067 627301227 127674641678296704 47650 ± 1400 5.71 ± 0.02 −2.78 ± 0.29 79 15.15 sdO
38.001041* 33.576702 632206097 134510477267997952 23720 ± 270 5.62 ± 0.03 −2.80> 22 15.42 sdB
42.586847 49.209444 714701194 438686001110484352 31040 ± 160 5.56 ± 0.04 −3.01 ± 0.79 26 15.76 sdB
48.922807 46.869773 606506145 434851149371030272 39550 ± 530 5.31 ± 0.04 −2.81 ± 0.23 21 15.77 sdO
49.744528 43.927658 616805109 242105008671742976 28450 ± 170 5.94 ± 0.02 −3.16 ± 0.14 27 16.51 sdB
54.117831 46.137875 587807246 247823740446444416 35190 ± 210 5.67 ± 0.04 −1.44 ± 0.05 16 16.41 sdOB
57.996529* 9.640213 587107104 3302502234815943296 23510 ± 170 5.41 ± 0.01 −3.00> 35 15.59 sdB
59.862336 27.08573 1405078 163565999746075264 33210 ± 840 5.22 ± 0.14 −2.84 ± 0.49 11 15.10 sdB
63.957018* 30.587572 504615117 165787700429000064 22230 ± 320 5.12 ± 0.04 −2.64 ± 0.16 13 16.46 sdB
70.810624 23.217639 184707246 146588028382865280 36390 ± 860 5.40 ± 0.28 −3.00> 17 15.91 sdO
72.124161* 15.127739 402714066 3308929464395407104 43920 ± 350 5.62 ± 0.04 −0.18 ± 0.04 29 15.59 He-sdOB
73.16829 17.529048 283501028 3406444218653682560 23550 ± 270 5.16 ± 0.02 −2.39 ± 0.08 19 16.20 sdB
74.772662 39.631731 302704157 199210757970191744 32890 ± 220 5.30 ± 0.04 −1.59 ± 0.06 32 15.94 sdB
76.710748 19.515218 202201036 3407876749162251648 50610 ± 1040 5.82 ± 0.09 −0.21 ± 0.12 33 16.07 He-sdO
88.877241 61.028656 707916071 282512988705189888 33890 ± 260 5.71 ± 0.05 −3.49> 20 15.58 sdB
88.918311* 19.073818 330903053 3398598348493762944 63830 ± 920 5.67 ± 0.39 −0.21 ± 0.09 39 14.63 He-sdO
89.559068 46.673715 604410009 197796403761616256 49310 ± 870 5.75 ± 0.11 −0.16 ± 0.06 21 17.12 He-sdOB
91.999515 13.6144053 679505089 3344334627867111168 30580 ± 1510 5.09 ± 0.01 −1.57 ± 0.12 162 12.19 sdB
92.025035 46.167062 604403022 963326637253435904 48220 ± 480 5.52 ± 0.13 −0.14 ± 0.12 18 17.47 He-sdOB
93.23016 57.847462 679716210 999261490450160512 29270 ± 270 5.43 ± 0.03 −2.28 ± 0.04 29 15.81 sdB
95.662806 46.542454 601111213 968469534172491648 27570 ± 240 5.45 ± 0.02 −2.72 ± 0.14 35 14.77 sdB
97.001902 20.849289 274315180 3376012799112785408 76560 ± 10740 5.10 ± 0.21 −0.10 ± 0.14 17 15.81 He-sdO
103.24919 52.713839 545808061 993265067567138432 31770 ± 1220 5.04 ± 0.14 −2.35 ± 0.19 17 15.46 sdB
105.67208 34.633185 604903156 939579041518246272 34060 ± 500 5.84 ± 0.22 −1.54 ± 0.09 24 17.09 sdOB
106.03268 24.199745 188107221 3380673418444759936 36990 ± 1180 5.80 ± 0.05 −1.73 ± 0.11 14 17.34 sdOB
107.27312 22.595127 616616046 3368172319132367104 48480 ± 2570 5.48 ± 0.04 −2.24 ± 0.09 29 16.17 sdO
107.72217* 56.412373 687616080 988436459174352512 41280 ± 540 5.79 ± 0.07 −2.87 ± 0.51 50 14.64 sdO
108.5057 69.55596 601216092 1109216024779190016 37890 ± 460 5.52 ± 0.06 −0.15 ± 0.05 14 16.19 He-sdOB
111.25613* 27.055098 606410248 872695092069071360 31890 ± 420 5.57 ± 0.12 −2.29 ± 0.06 34 16.19 sdB
111.39693 81.847694 617015027 1142701823200960512 36490 ± 140 5.82 ± 0.11 −1.48 ± 0.07 29 15.05 sdOB
112.18863 13.440832 688810176 3163565604772130560 27930 ± 480 5.47 ± 0.07 −2.47 ± 0.13 13 15.67 sdB
112.207639 2.233514 600415096 3135810671409226368 31090 ± 330 5.56 ± 0.10 −3.13 ± 0.48 13 15.99 sdB
112.851109 0.444741 600405172 3134542693985873408 46650 ± 1600 5.74 ± 0.25 1.22 ± 0.10 12 16.31 He-sdOB
113.70542 12.424434 688802020 3162537840574968832 25600 ± 110 5.95 ± 0.05 −3.28> 31 16.46 sdB
113.898132 2.969486 600412059 3135525623021849088 37090 ± 180 5.71 ± 0.07 −1.47 ± 0.08 19 15.95 sdOB
113.95052 26.831992 606408234 872122177791852288 32740 ± 550 5.79 ± 0.19 −1.75 ± 0.16 12 17.99 sdB
114.35958 12.757287 688801151 3162576078665811840 29250 ± 250 5.54 ± 0.10 −3.00> 11 17.72 sdB
118.30847* 11.211171 605805093 3150707232898463616 29360 ± 60 5.42 ± 0.01 −2.44 ± 0.04 52 15.60 sdB
118.3712975 23.4100853 689603199 675213084211549696 34070 ± 40 5.75 ± 0.01 −1.68 ± 0.03 122 13.27 sdOB
123.243814* 0.731455 641316208 3089571878131969792 28390 ± 340 5.42 ± 0.03 −2.61 ± 0.13 24 14.59 sdB
124.735819 39.901597 642010128 909317797165729024 22910 ± 210 5.44 ± 0.07 −3.48 ± 0.29 38 14.94 sdB
124.998525* 22.6836111 602216224 676607952150024448 31300 ± 180 5.69 ± 0.07 −1.79 ± 0.07 17 15.64 sdB
125.2234083* 0.1455028 641315139 3077510098136276480 29030 ± 90 5.65 ± 0.02 −1.96 ± 0.16 31 15.18 sdB
126.190367* 23.255656 602216150 678116344664890368 29900 ± 220 5.47 ± 0.02 −2.95 ± 0.14 38 15.34 sdB
126.28563* 48.675328 615105036 930960515328049536 29760 ± 300 5.62 ± 0.07 −2.96 ± 0.33 17 16.98 sdB
129.0820292* 20.9636028 699412249 664631178147534720 31370 ± 440 5.52 ± 0.11 −2.44 ± 0.15 10 16.34 sdB
130.255486* 39.938389 642006098 911573758803336960 29380 ± 140 5.69 ± 0.03 −2.41 ± 0.06 31 15.45 sdB
131.034178* 31.03639 130107157 706479277895031040 29320 ± 340 5.39 ± 0.03 −2.14 ± 0.07 30 14.56 sdB
131.19586* 11.652792 420803011 601862464498177664 28580 ± 190 5.37 ± 0.01 −2.53 ± 0.07 38 16.13 sdB
134.47774* 38.314391 711713027 719606175420853888 30870 ± 230 5.52 ± 0.09 −2.62> 14 15.68 sdB
137.90359* 27.877858 186807004 698115121143554176 46750 ± 1780 5.72 ± 0.03 −2.87 ± 0.21 17 17.00 sdO
143.8201083* 22.8279833 606605119 644079931432984704 37000 ± 430 5.64 ± 0.07 −2.05 ± 0.07 38 16.29 sdOB
144.90796 17.664899 606102183 620899404525808768 79240 ± 5590 6.58 ± 0.06 −2.19 ± 0.36 17 17.48 sdO
147.75537* 3.7991754 709312041 3849462024992532608 29500 ± 110 5.41 ± 0.04 −2.63 ± 0.62 19 15.89 sdB
148.3206292* 15.5617194 731215192 616743220508208896 41010 ± 10 5.66 ± 0.05 1.80 ± 0.07 35 15.52 He-sdOB
150.4163042 −3.0035611 723303210 3829267569803099776 31220 ± 470 5.47 ± 0.07 −2.81 ± 0.53 16 16.71 sdB
160.469575* 21.675766 712413228 3987913113277693184 33410 ± 90 5.75 ± 0.02 −2.17 ± 0.04 48 13.07 sdOB
162.3896667* 18.7115278 215810196 3983291213071411712 29500 ± 340 5.14 ± 0.06 −2.44 ± 0.07 34 14.92 sdB
178.016827* 39.140844 657402229 4034502959999559168 55800 ± 2480 5.48 ± 0.09 −2.03 ± 0.17 16 15.36 sdO
195.10638* 0.7583765 144103116 3689536684343245312 37940 ± 730 6.02 ± 0.14 −1.42 ± 0.09 16 15.72 sdOB
199.69624* 44.595021 739312049 1550490241899314560 42850 ± 100 5.73 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.07 68 14.77 He-sdOB
204.2248833* 11.4347944 734713132 3738606616980353664 37850 ± 260 5.87 ± 0.06 −1.50 ± 0.05 14 16.34 sdOB
204.54297* 43.295307 449115138 1501713500909166208 34600 ± 560 5.19 ± 0.06 −1.12 ± 0.15 12 16.77 sdOB
206.58844* 22.810201 660604235 1251408094001504640 35240 ± 2100 5.94 ± 0.17 −0.16 ± 0.08 14 17.15 He-sdOB
206.7520875* 11.1901194 733615158 3727881843124118400 23510 ± 40 5.60 ± 0.01 −3.00> 63 14.96 sdB
208.76946* −2.506063 651513250 3657799934042253952 45740 ± 1000 5.65 ± 0.04 −1.80 ± 0.13 35 12.06 sdO
211.43857* 1.7386288 732404097 3661331668469980416 27770 ± 90 5.27 ± 0.02 −2.02 ± 0.05 37 15.81 sdB
212.732694* 9.548705 723502076 3723006814724972416 36840 ± 220 5.83 ± 0.02 −1.66 ± 0.06 60 14.05 sdOB
213.954395* 11.2038595 723504163 1225417739360402048 41500 ± 100 5.50 ± 0.11 1.67 ± 0.25 22 16.03 He-sdOB
221.29285 14.229163 343616178 1185738013981539840 57000 ± 3130 6.52 ± 0.07 −2.61> 17 16.39 sdO
221.3759375* 17.4645 657010071 1234828283288291840 71170 ± 6170 6.90 ± 0.07 −2.08 ± 0.24 28 16.23 sdO
223.01644* 45.558239 742605036 1586890398971315200 49470 ± 1360 5.65 ± 0.08 −1.98 ± 0.14 22 17.23 sdO
224.526717 8.858398 651102213 1161864283648012160 22500 ± 160 5.48 ± 0.03 −3.22 ± 0.10 54 14.64 sdB
224.5663917* 37.0047194 743709156 1295107633891682944 49610 ± 600 6.04 ± 0.10 0.00 ± 0.04 22 17.30 He-sdOB
224.8688067* 19.0638675 657013168 1188933362275187200 36420 ± 540 6.00 ± 0.03 −1.53 ± 0.04 44 14.25 sdOB
227.154254* 10.053918 651108142 1167834597427267456 35880 ± 290 5.79 ± 0.11 −1.13 ± 0.12 47 15.10 sdOB
231.78* 10.270154 565710176 1165815825359631232 33230 ± 730 5.15 ± 0.05 −1.97 ± 0.08 13 16.14 sdB
234.67853* 9.5784135 565707040 1165071009310870912 35840 ± 110 5.62 ± 0.03 −0.93 ± 0.04 19 15.73 sdOB
239.4949003* 14.0390339 740903219 1191689807863866112 30520 ± 310 5.85 ± 0.03 −2.88 ± 0.67 33 15.37 sdB
239.8282* 5.6004099 744014072 4426623509802852352 30650 ± 170 5.53 ± 0.03 −2.96 ± 0.18 16 16.88 sdB
241.1203583* 14.8469639 740909091 1192038902805203328 32460 ± 90 5.88 ± 0.06 −3.06 ± 0.47 28 16.04 sdB
243.18797* 4.2115442 744007193 4437254653372798848 45700 ± 350 5.65 ± 0.05 0.96 ± 0.17 22 16.03 He-sdOB
245.7361* 47.514196 743008201 1410860511508492288 28100 ± 220 5.66 ± 0.05 −1.79 ± 0.05 24 16.24 sdB
247.4703492* 11.0840364 663715062 4458994472154612480 27990 ± 160 5.42 ± 0.00 −2.61 ± 0.04 33 14.35 sdB
247.9622125* 48.0752639 743006102 1410554774260311808 38780 ± 420 5.55 ± 0.06 −0.48 ± 0.09 11 17.12 He-sdOB
250.878644* 51.415874 585102152 1413338325384928128 35940 ± 550 5.09 ± 0.03 −2.02 ± 0.12 20 16.17 sdOB
251.64371* 26.6312 743504173 1307252843628956672 39810 ± 490 6.27 ± 0.04 2.20 ± 0.12 35 16.14 He-sdB
254.756648* 29.042889 739510211 1309437641952913920 27720 ± 700 5.61 ± 0.12 −2.89 ± 0.19 12 16.11 sdB
254.990298* 28.848331 739510216 1308678016856993920 37520 ± 660 5.73 ± 0.00 −3.18 ± 0.19 96 14.39 sdO
255.76656 15.138432 745914113 4545907052398514432 27460 ± 400 5.34 ± 0.04 −1.88 ± 0.77 17 17.12 sdB
257.76869 11.765573 664314127 4540919083539644672 29410 ± 410 5.61 ± 0.05 −2.53 ± 0.14 10 17.80 sdB
258.2631* 16.178565 745911237 4546882216133354752 35550 ± 420 5.82 ± 0.03 −1.61 ± 0.04 40 16.27 sdOB
259.33566 9.6920351 664305033 4491582966009639040 54240 ± 1590 5.25 ± 0.20 1.76 ± 0.21 26 16.94 He-sdOB
259.824376* 47.372495 745114017 1365071418489267584 38620 ± 530 5.87 ± 0.06 −2.58 ± 0.25 13 15.79 sdOB
260.03809 15.843371 745912208 4546952309999524096 42240 ± 590 5.13 ± 0.05 2.10 ± 0.01 27 16.43 He-sdOB
262.26331 17.326944 742209223 4550175420961718528 37750 ± 660 5.17 ± 0.08 −2.65 ± 0.19 10 16.31 sdB
262.8484903 46.2253286 566204175 1361931728676649984 28770 ± 1270 5.65 ± 0.07 −1.98 ± 0.10 22 17.15 sdB
264.4181 19.372917 742808226 4550885847209172736 32300 ± 110 5.69 ± 0.03 −2.13 ± 0.10 15 16.99 sdOB
270.030251 31.577103 663811042 4603104815507642752 26970 ± 440 5.52 ± 0.05 −3.23 ± 0.24 27 15.23 sdB
271.34282 15.200315 746410046 4498502433203434368 28260 ± 100 5.30 ± 0.02 −3.07 ± 0.15 14 16.92 sdB
271.95262 14.507648 746402150 4498196768968750336 28730 ± 290 5.39 ± 0.04 −3.00 ± 0.18 38 15.91 sdB
272.36637 16.769945 746403210 4502091509736932608 65660 ± 11140 5.68 ± 0.06 −1.79 ± 0.15 15 17.77 sdO
272.76169 17.633307 746415156 4526224282435916544 44410 ± 1260 5.97 ± 0.19 0.54 ± 0.12 19 17.10 He-sdOB
273.0417 18.131682 746411012 4526347084141410432 30170 ± 50 5.41 ± 0.01 −3.08 ± 0.84 48 15.48 sdB
273.04685 17.927912 746411078 4526236102186660352 23640 ± 420 5.03 ± 0.07 −2.30 ± 0.15 12 17.40 sdB
273.32165 34.316932 743615051 4605158393990687360 31140 ± 50 5.37 ± 0.04 −1.88 ± 0.29 23 17.15 sdB
274.13538 34.930314 743615206 4605575383775753856 47780 ± 1720 5.48 ± 0.03 −2.92 ± 0.11 59 16.02 sdO
274.83431 18.178403 746412176 4523666131196149632 27630 ± 220 5.14 ± 0.03 −2.95 ± 0.21 13 16.44 sdB
274.88444 6.0783654 742405150 4476966603891088640 36240 ± 580 5.37 ± 0.16 −3.00> 13 17.13 sdB
274.95133* 33.369344 743604247 4592825172063276288 28380 ± 180 5.44 ± 0.02 −2.55 ± 0.07 32 16.44 sdB
275.51348 10.739026 746714189 4483659679067140992 28940 ± 390 5.05 ± 0.07 −1.44 ± 0.07 12 17.37 sdB
288.82889* 42.93705 664703151 2102745688098547840 38420 ± 960 5.54 ± 0.16 −3.05 ± 0.29 25 14.49 sdO
291.81268* 38.45518 664011152 2052684550030830464 39890 ± 50 5.38 ± 0.15 0.54 ± 0.04 32 15.61 He-sdOB
292.78702* 43.416039 664613110 2125895669204184832 66880 ± 11150 5.15 ± 0.03 −1.01 ± 0.35 43 13.59 sdO
293.53371 35.000895 664007120 2048109069842534912 34560 ± 810 5.71 ± 0.06 −1.41 ± 0.06 13 15.34 sdOB
293.86659 35.732989 664008145 2048434490916786176 29610 ± 300 5.63 ± 0.09 −2.62 ± 0.20 16 15.77 sdB
303.0673667* 8.2691222 587214212 4251149700348007680 27730 ± 220 5.39 ± 0.06 −2.98 ± 0.12 49 14.62 sdB
303.406715 9.467058 746301022 4299431347569705216 33430 ± 110 5.15 ± 0.02 −2.62 ± 0.06 119 12.41 sdOB
305.47392 6.488096 587308185 4249752113691558144 30820 ± 580 5.65 ± 0.07 −2.85> 12 17.44 sdB
305.67635 7.2876099 587304110 4249937660575808000 29270 ± 130 5.42 ± 0.03 −3.10 ± 0.14 17 17.07 sdB
317.36219 37.139663 680412153 1868767831308190976 50100 ± 1630 5.53 ± 0.04 −1.68 ± 0.06 41 15.28 sdO
317.503089 15.486887 677702178 1760662130066900352 43540 ± 520 5.45 ± 0.11 1.53 ± 0.50 18 16.40 He-sdOB
318.85231 38.577478 593803082 1965019835117424000 27670 ± 380 5.34 ± 0.05 −2.59 ± 0.30 12 17.63 sdB
318.88115 12.665982 592402156 1746789866736764800 29120 ± 370 5.55 ± 0.05 −2.65 ± 0.16 30 16.02 sdB
319.51366* 14.681637 592414174 1759463868550744576 28960 ± 70 5.60 ± 0.02 −3.00> 62 15.06 sdB
320.52329 21.686536 593111200 1790728889707996800 27620 ± 180 5.50 ± 0.02 −2.61 ± 0.03 28 15.17 sdB
320.87692* 0.710801 254804012 2690967057290240000 35050 ± 280 5.89 ± 0.04 −0.78 ± 0.04 24 16.87 He-sdOB
320.98619 15.55655 592415028 1783640205099886336 49100 ± 2030 5.54 ± 0.20 0.60 ± 0.08 18 16.71 He-sdOB
321.5339 2.759411 677911144 2691867011851791744 29550 ± 370 5.90 ± 0.07 −2.58 ± 0.20 12 16.16 sdB
321.70608 15.760201 592412140 1783628003096502144 34010 ± 470 5.84 ± 0.06 −1.61 ± 0.07 16 17.05 sdOB
321.797821* 0.196107 677904113 2687870218366060416 29570 ± 90 5.52 ± 0.03 −2.98 ± 0.08 61 14.57 sdB
322.80103* 11.493389 679903086 1745849337621677184 37210 ± 290 5.89 ± 0.02 −1.66 ± 0.04 55 15.94 sdOB
323.6435* 9.6801009 679901047 1741581170917641728 36590 ± 140 5.79 ± 0.05 −1.44 ± 0.04 49 15.55 sdOB
335.57083 26.93794 594102069 1881671180067646080 28760 ± 270 5.38 ± 0.08 −3.41 ± 0.45 26 16.77 sdB
335.57458 27.588819 594105250 1881776668761026688 50650 ± 2760 5.56 ± 0.23 −2.30 ± 0.17 50 15.50 sdO
340.48328 17.803049 601803112 2832879034517348608 30510 ± 600 5.46 ± 0.06 −3.26> 18 17.53 sdB
341.26507* 32.364203 680503235 1890677009230168704 31020 ± 240 5.70 ± 0.04 −2.74 ± 0.12 89 14.00 sdB
341.89198* 33.011002 680503175 1890817059523265024 26720 ± 230 5.55 ± 0.04 −2.82 ± 0.09 33 16.00 sdB
344.17032* 29.762963 606014218 1886200725594365568 36060 ± 1050 6.01 ± 0.07 −1.48 ± 0.08 34 16.35 sdOB
344.54285* 40.727771 604109042 1930945626165804032 43920 ± 290 5.55 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.08 26 15.99 He-sdOB
346.28713 30.454833 677603238 1886482196274463488 35340 ± 860 5.88 ± 0.12 −1.48 ± 0.10 12 17.18 sdOB
347.33042 36.899804 678214001 1915148289773812352 33520 ± 790 5.68 ± 0.04 −1.41 ± 0.05 13 16.41 sdOB
350.23543 34.39527 678205023 1912906626082386304 36100 ± 140 5.79 ± 0.02 −1.40 ± 0.03 44 15.43 sdOB
350.90066 45.217675 587411151 1937879932466496896 23950 ± 1700 5.81 ± 0.11 −2.72 ± 0.22 10 17.07 sdB
351.37223 41.518334 587405077 1923590271333313792 38370 ± 660 5.90 ± 0.07 −1.41 ± 0.07 31 16.30 sdOB
352.05393 29.892664 593502206 2869717686274246400 45030 ± 2480 5.55 ± 0.54 1.19 ± 0.17 14 16.71 He-sdOB
352.23596 49.468338 689005189 1942912367126946304 40640 ± 30 5.59 ± 0.03 1.88 ± 0.06 19 17.38 He-sdB
352.34432 32.233162 593503117 2872454748672529280 31070 ± 280 5.49 ± 0.07 −2.59 ± 0.26 22 16.93 sdB
353.68925 51.004629 689015198 1944738965178800384 37140 ± 490 5.53 ± 0.03 −3.23> 45 16.03 sdO
354.17191 31.533466 593504113 2871378846483069184 33470 ± 280 5.96 ± 0.04 −2.46 ± 0.12 24 16.86 sdB
354.84683 46.912366 678715200 1939195223251633024 30560 ± 750 5.82 ± 0.08 −1.53 ± 0.06 16 17.78 sdB
355.66937* 43.91102 678701017 1925782766239946624 39780 ± 480 5.29 ± 0.05 −2.75 ± 0.14 33 16.15 sdO
358.62099 35.560802 602605007 2878501890826543616 32860 ± 940 5.43 ± 0.09 −1.69 ± 0.09 16 17.43 sdOB

Notes. From left to right, we list the R.A., decl., LAMOST_ObsID, and Gaia source_id. Then the Teff, log g, and $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ are listed from the XTgrid fits. Next, the S/N in the u band, the apparent magnitudes in the Gaia G band, and the spectral classifications are listed, respectively.

aStars labeled with ∗ also appear in the hot subdwarf catalog of Geier et al. (2017). b">" denotes an upper limit of $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ for the object.

A machine-readable version of the table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset images: 1 2 3

Figure 3 shows the parameter diagrams for the 182 single-lined hot subdwarf stars. In panel (a), the majority of sdB stars (black circles) are in a region that is well defined by the zero-age horizontal branch and terminal-age horizontal branch (e.g., centered at Teff = 28,000 K and log g = 5.5 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$), which demonstrates that these stars are undergoing helium burning in their cores. On the other hand, sdOB stars (blue up triangles) that cluster around at Teff = 34,000 K and log g = 5.8 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$, present higher effective temperatures and log g than sdB stars. SdO stars (green squares) and He-sdO stars (aqua left triangles) present the highest effective temperatures in our sample, e.g., most of them have Teff > 40,000 K, but with a wide range of log g. He-sdOB stars (red diamonds) cluster around at Teff = 45,000 K and log g = 5.6 $\mathrm{cm}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-2}$. The 2 He-sdB stars (magenta stars), which present the highest He abundance in our sample, are located in the area very close to our He-sdOB stars in panel (a). The hot subdwarf samples share similar characteristics in the Teff–log g diagram with our previous study (e.g., see panel (a) of Figure 4 in Lei et al. 2019b and Figure 6 in Lei et al. 2018).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Atmospheric parameter diagrams for the 182 hot subdwarf stars identified in this study. The markers and number counts for different types of hot subdwarfs are shown in the upper-left box of each panel. Panel (a): Teff–log g diagram. The zero-age horizontal branch and terminal-age horizontal branch sequences with [Fe/H] = −1.48 from Dorman et al. (1993) are denoted by dashed lines. The He-MS from Paczyński (1971) is marked by the black solid line. Three evolution tracks for hot HB stars from Dorman et al. (1993) are shown with brown dotted curves, and their masses from top to bottom are 0.495, 0.490, and 0.488 M, respectively. Panel (b): Teff$\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ diagram. The black dotted line and dotted–dashed line are the linear regression lines fitted by Edelmann et al. (2003) and Németh et al. (2012), respectively. Panel (c): log g-$\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ diagram. The red horizontal dashed lines in panels (b) and (c) denote the solar value of the He abundance (e.g., $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ = −1).

Standard image High-resolution image

Panel (b) in Figure 3 shows the Teff$\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ diagram for our hot subdwarf sample. Two distinct helium sequences, e.g., a He-rich sequence (fitted by dotted line) and a He-weak sequence (fitted by dotted–dashed line), which were discovered by Edelmann et al. (2003) and confirmed by later studies (Németh et al. 2012; Geier et al. 2013; Luo et al. 2016b; Lei et al. 2018, 2019b), are clearly present in this panel. As found by Lei et al. (2019b), the He-rich sequence consists of sdB, sdOB, He-sdOB, and He-sdB stars, while the He-weak sequence consists purely of sdO stars. Furthermore, the three He-sdO stars (aqua left triangles) identified in this study are located between the two He sequences. However, the physical mechanism responsible for the two He sequences of hot subdwarf stars is still unclear, and additional scenarios are needed.

In panel (b), one also can find a gap (e.g., Teff = 40,000 K and $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ = 0.0) in He-sdOB stars (red diamonds), which splits the He-sdOB stars into two subgroups, e.g., a subgroup with higher He abundances and temperatures, and the other subgroup with lower He abundance and temperatures. With larger size of He-sdOB stars, this gap is more clearly present in panel (b) of Figure 4 in Lei et al. (2019b). As discussed in Lei et al. (2019b), the gap also appears in the EHB stars of globular cluster (GC) ω Cen, but the star fraction of the two subgroups between field hot subdwarf stars and ω Cen EHB stars are very different. Moreover, three He-sdB stars are found in this study that present the highest He abundances (e.g., $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})\,\gt $ 2.0) in our sample. However, the most He-rich stars are completely missing from the EHB stars of ω Cen (see Figure 6 in Lei et al. 2019b and the text therein for detailed discussion). All these results point toward a different formation of field hot subdwarf stars and GC EHB stars, and provide a strict observational limit on the evolution models for the two types of objects.

As described above, we have 74 stars in common with the hot subdwarf catalog of Geier et al. (2017). Therefore, we compared the parameters of the stars obtained in this study and the parameters reported in the catalog of Geier et al. (2017) as long as their atmospheric parameters are available. Figure 4 presents the results from this comparison. Horizontal coordinates denote the parameter values obtained in this study, while vertical coordinates represent the values from Geier et al. (2017). As we see in Figure 4, the values of Teff (e.g., left panel) and $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$ (e.g., right panel) obtained in this study are well consistent with the ones reported in Geier et al. (2017). Although the comparison of log g (middle panel) shows a little larger dispersion than the other two parameters (e.g., Teff and $\mathrm{log}(n\mathrm{He}/n{\rm{H}})$), the values are still comparable when the large systematic errors that affect log g are considered. One source of these errors stems from the different implementations of Stark broadening tables in various model atmosphere codes. Another source is the variable observational data quality at the Balmer jump, which constrains log g. With these in mind the comparison results demonstrate a reliable spectral analysis of this study.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Atmospheric parameters comparison with the catalog of Geier et al. (2017) for the common stars.

Standard image High-resolution image

5. Discussion and Summary

We selected 607 hot subdwarf candidates by cross-matching the catalog of Geier et al. (2019) with the LAMOST DR6 and DR7 spectral database, and identified 182 hot subdwarf stars, among which 108 stars are newly discovered. Together with the 682 hot subdwarf stars identified by Lei et al. (2018, 2019b), we found 864 hot subdwarfs in the LAMOST spectral database, and 349 of them are new discoveries.

The hot subdwarf candidates in Lei et al. (2018, 2019b) were selected visually in the Gaia DR2 HR diagram, which means a little different selection filter from the one used by Geier et al. (2019, see Section 3 in their study). Therefore, we cross-matched all the 864 hot subdwarf stars identified in our series of studies with the Geier et al. (2019) catalog, and found 833 common stars. This result demonstrates that nearly all the hot subdwarf stars identified in Lei et al. (2018, 2019b) are included in the Geier et al. (2019) catalog. As described in Section 2.3, 2513 candidates from the catalog of Geier et al. (2019) have LAMOST spectra, of which 1348 have S/N-u larger than 10, and 833 of them were spectroscopically identified as hot subdwarf stars. Based on these results, one can roughly estimate the fraction of hot subdwarf stars in the catalog of Geier et al. (2019).

Figure 5 shows the distributions of selected hot subdwarf candidates (left) and the fraction of confirmed hot subdwarfs (right) with respect to Gaia G band magnitude. As shown in the left panel, for the brighter sample (e.g., 9 < Gaia G mag $\lt \,13$, which usually represents higher S/N), the candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 (blue-dashed histogram) have nearly the same size as the whole sample (red-solid histogram), which means a good completeness of the bright end of the catalog. However, only part of these stars were identified as hot subdwarf stars (green-dotted histogram). This result also can be seen clearly in the right panel. The fraction of candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 in the whole sample (gray-dashed curve) decreases from 100% to 80% within this magnitude range, and the fraction of hot subdwarf stars among the candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 (blue-dotted curve) is nearly the same as in the whole sample (red-solid curve), e.g., roughly between 10% and 40%. These results demonstrate that the hot subdwarf fraction of the candidates in Geier et al. (2019) for brighter stars (e.g., 9 < Gaia G mag <13) is roughly from 10% to 40%, and increasing gradually with the magnitude. It can be understood that there are more O/B type MS stars, rather than hot subdwarf stars, in the brighter part of the catalog of Geier et al. (2019). Thus, the brighter the sample, the much lower fraction of hot subdwarf stars it contains. Composite spectra were removed from our sample, if they were included and turned out to be real hot subdwarfs, this fraction could be a little higher.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Distributions of hot subdwarf candidates (left) and confirmed hot subdwarf fraction (right) with respect to Gaia G magnitude. Left panel: the red-solid histogram presents the distribution of 2513 candidates with a bin size of 0.25 mag; the blue-dashed histogram denotes the distribution of 1348 candidates with S/N-u larger than 10; while the green-dotted histogram represents the distribution of 833 hot subdwarf stars spectroscopically identified among the 2513 candidates with LAMOST spectra. Right panel: the red-solid curve is the hot subdwarf fraction among 2513 candidate stars; the blue-dotted curve is the hot subdwarf fraction in 1348 candidates with S/N-u larger than 10; while the gray-dashed curve presents the fraction of candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 among the 2513 candidates.

Standard image High-resolution image

With fainter samples (e.g., 13 < Gaia G mag <16), the S/N-u of the spectra become lower. Therefore, many candidates do not enter into our sample due to low S/N, and the completeness of the sample becomes worse. The fraction of candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 among all candidates drops gradually from 80% to 60% as the magnitude increases from 13 to 16 mag (see gray-dashed curve in the right panel). In this magnitude range, we got a hot subdwarf fraction in the whole sample (red-solid curve in the right panel) going from 40% to 60%. Considering that some real hot subdwarf stars were removed from our sample due to low S/N-u or composite feature, the hot subdwarf fraction could be higher in this magnitude range. At the faint end of the sample, above 16 mag, the number of candidates with S/N-u larger than 10 drops quickly. Therefore, the candidates we analyzed in this magnitude range become extremely incomplete, and the hot subdwarf fraction obtained from these candidates is meaningless. One can expect more WDs rather than hot subdwarfs among the fainter candidates. A more accurate estimation of the fraction of hot subdwarf stars in the catalog of Geier et al. (2019) can be obtained when the results from analysis of composite spectra will be available.

The results obtained in this study reflect the high efficiency of the method to search for hot subdwarf stars by combining Gaia DR2 data with LAMOST spectra. We obtained reliable atmospheric parameters for all the hot subdwarf candidates using detailed spectral analysis with non-LTE model atmospheres. The atmospheric parameters are consistent with the ones from literature and the hot subdwarf catalog of Geier et al. (2017). We also estimated the hot subdwarf fraction in the catalog of Geier et al. (2019) based on the candidates we have analyzed. We found that the bright part (9 mag < Gaia $G\lt $ 13 mag) of the catalog is nearly complete, but has many false-positive candidates (over 60%, mostly B-type stars). In the 13 < Gaia G <16 magnitude range the hot subdwarf fraction goes from 40% to 60%. The completeness of the catalog degrades quickly above G = 16 mag. Furthermore, we selected about 150 hot subdwarf candidates with composite spectra in LAMOST DR6 and DR7. The results from their spectral analysis will be reported in a forthcoming paper. Since all spectra are observed with the same equipment and analyzed with the same method, we believe that the LAMOST hot subdwarf sample will make important contributions to study the formation and evolution of these special blue objects.

We thank the anonymous referee for their valuable suggestions and comments which improved this work greatly. L.Z. acknowledges support from National Natural Science Foundation of China grant No. 11503016, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province grant No. 2017JJ3283, the Youth Fund project of Hunan Provincial Education Department grant No. 15B214, Cultivation Project for LAMOST Scientific Payoff and Research Achievement of CAMS-CAS. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant Nos. 11390371, 11988101, 11973048, National Key R&D Program of China No.2019YFA0405502, the Astronomical Big Data Joint Research Center, co-founded by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Alibaba Cloud. This research has used the services of www.Astroserver.org under reference D879YE and D880YE. P.N. acknowledges support from the grant Agency of the Czech Republic (GAČR 18-20083S). The LAMOST Fellowship is supported by Special Funding for Advanced Users, budgeted and administered by the Center for Astronomical Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAMS). Guoshoujing Telescope (the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope LAMOST) is a National Major Scientific Project built by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Funding for the project has been provided by the National Development and Reform Commission. LAMOST is operated and managed by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Footnotes

  • We will analyze composite spectra and report those results in a forthcoming paper.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/ab660a