Abstract
We investigate whether first-principles calculations with an improved description of electronic correlations can explain the large magnetic moments and the strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy in the ferromagnetic compound UGa2. The correlations are treated within a static mean-field approximation DFT+U combining the density functional theory (DFT) with an onsite Hubbard interaction U. We find that DFT+U improves the agreement of the magnetic moments with the experiment compared to DFT but worsens the theoretical description of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. H. Hill in Plutonium 1970 and Other Actinides, edited by W. N. Miner (The Metallurgical Society of the AIME, 1970).
A.V. Andreev, K.P. Belov, A.V. Deriagin, Z.A. Kazei, R.Z. Levitin, A. Meňovský, Y.F. Popov, and V.I. Silant’ev, Sov. Phys. JETP 48, 1187 (1978).
A.C. Lawson, A. Williams, J.L. Smith, P.A. Seeger, J.A. Goldstone, J.A. O’Rourke, Z. Fisk, J. Magn. Matter. 50, 83 (1985).
T. Gouder, L. Havela, M. Diviš, J. Rebizant, P.M. Oppeneer and M. Richter, J. Alloys Compd. 314, 7 (2001).
S. Fujimori, M. Kobata, Y. Takeda, T. Okane, Y. Saitoh, A. Fujimori, H. Yamagami, Y. Haga, E. Yamamoto, and Y. Onuki, Phys. Rev. B 99, 035109 (2019).
M. Diviš, M. Richter, H. Eschrig and L. Steinbeck, Phys. Rev. B 65, 049901 (2001).
A. B. Shick, A.I. Liechtenstein and W.E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 60, 10763 (1999).
E. R. Ylvisaker, W. E. Pickett and K. Koepernik, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035103 (2009).
V. P. Antropov, V. N. Antonov, L. V. Bekenov, A. Kutepov and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 90, 054404 (2014).
P. Larson, I.I. Mazin and D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214405 (2003).
J.T. Zhang, J.L. Wang, C. Ji, B.X. Guo, W.S. Xia, X.M. Lu and J.S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165132 (2017).
L. Nordstrom, M.S.S. Brooks and B. Johansson, J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 4, 3261 (1992).
X. Wang, D. Wang, R. Wu, and A.J. Freeman, JMMM 159, 337–341 (1996).
P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G.K.H. Madsen and L.D. Marks, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020).
M. Diviš, M. Richter, H. Eschrig and L. Steinbeck, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9658 (1996).
S. L. Dudarev, G.A. Botton, S.Y. Savrasov, C.J. Humphreys, and A.P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
M. C. Nguyen, Y. Yao, C. Wang, K. Ho, and V. P. Antropov, arXiv:1706.07368 (2017).
J.X. Zhu, M. Janoschek, R. Rosenberg, F. Ronning, J.D. Thompson, M.A. Torrez, E.D. Bauer, and C.D. Batista, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021027 (2014).
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support by the Czech Science Foundation under the grant number 18-02344S. Access to computing facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum, provided under the program Cesnet LM2015042, is appreciated. B. C. thanks F. Máca, P. Blaha, and V. Pokorný for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chatterjee, B., Kolorenč, J. Magnetism and magnetic anisotropy in UGa2. MRS Advances 5, 2639–2645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.314
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.314