Ionization dynamics and gauge invariance

J. Vábek, H. Bachau, and F. Catoire
Phys. Rev. A 106, 053115 – Published 28 November 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Photoionization is one of the most fundamental processes in laser-matter interaction. It plays a crucial role also from the practical point of view since the electron-density dynamics in a gaseous medium is a process that affects the field propagation. Photoionization has been addressed in different regimes: linear, multiphoton, and tunneling. The ideal tool that allows for the description of ionization, in all aforementioned regimes, is the numerical evaluation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The determination of the electron density needs the computation of the time-dependent ionization probability which unfortunately is an ambiguous quantity due to the gauge dependence of the latter. In this paper, we show how to overcome this difficulty by properly defining the time-dependent ionization probability in the context of the resolvent operator method. We show in particular that the velocity gauge allows for a definition of adiabatic states that is suitable to define an ionization threshold at all times during the interaction to compute ionization probability. Applications to linear, multiphoton, and tunneling regimes are presented for the one-dimensional problem. The extension to the nondipole case is discussed and we show that time-dependent ionization probability cannot be defined unambiguously due to the introduction of the magnetic-field component. We also discuss the case of gauge invariance in a subspace of the eigenbasis defined by the Hamiltonian.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 19 May 2022
  • Accepted 4 November 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.053115

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & OpticalGeneral Physics

Authors & Affiliations

J. Vábek1,2,3, H. Bachau1,*, and F. Catoire1,†

  • 1Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications, Université de Bordeaux–Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–CEA, 33405 Talence Cedex, France
  • 2ELI Beamlines Centre, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 25241 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
  • 3Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Jugoslávských Partyzánů 1580/3, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic

  • *Present address: BP 119, 49 Cours Pasteur, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
  • fabrice.catoire@u-bordeaux.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 5 — November 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×