Abstract
Comparisons of related species differing in conservation status may offer insights into causes of species declines. We studied egg-laying patterns and landscape occupancy of two sympatric lycaenidae butterflies inhabiting xeric grasslands, vulnerable Polyommatus thersites and critically endangered Polyommatus [Agrodiaetus] damon, both developing on sainfoin, Onobrychis spp. Females of bivoltine P. thersites oviposit on host plant leaves at a relatively low height (≈20 cm), in both spring (May–June) and summer (July–August) generations. Females of univoltine P. damon (July–September) oviposit to senescing inflorescences, in significantly higher heights (>30 cm), and the species is hence vulnerable to summer mowing or grazing. On a landscape scale, both species tended to occur at sites with diverse sward management, including temporarily unmanaged patches. In addition, P. damon occurred only in the proximity of other occupied sites. The study documents that grassland management must respect the needs of the most vulnerable species, and because these needs are seldom known, it must maintain a high diversity of conditions within individual sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE T. Automat. Contr. 19(6): 716–723.
Beneš J., Konvička M., Dvořák J., Fric Z., Havelka Z., Pavlíčko A., Vrabec V. & Weidenhoffer Z. 2002. Motýli České republiky: Rozšíření a ochrana I. Společnost pro ochranu motýlů, Praha, 478 pp. ISBN: 8090321208
Binzenhofer B., Biedermann R., Settele J. & Schroder B. 2008. Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Ecol. Res. 23(2): 259–269. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-007-0376-x
Bourn N.A.D. & Thomas J.A. 2002. The challenge of conserving grassland insects at the margins of their range in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 104: 285–292. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00193-8
Brereton T.M., Warren M.S., Roy D.B. & Stewart K. 2008. The changing status of the Chalkhill Blue butterfly Polyommatus coridon in the UK: the impacts of conservation policies and environmental factors. J. Insect Conserv. 12(6): 629–638. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-007-9099-0
Buszko J. & Masłowski J. 2008. Motyle dzienne Polski. Koliber, Oprawa, 276 pp. ISBN: 8392515048
Čížek L., Fric Z. & Konvička M. 2006. Host plant defences and voltinism in European butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 31(4): 337–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00783.x
Čížek L., Hauck D. & Pokluda P. 2012. Contrasting needs of grassland dwellers: habitat preferences of endangered steppe beetles (Coleoptera). J. Insect Conserv. 16(2): 281–293. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9415-6
Čížek O., Zámečník J., Tropek R., Kočárek P. & Konvička M. 2012. Diversification of mowing regime increases arthropods diversity in species-poor cultural hay meadows. J. Insect Conserv. 16(2): 215–226. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9407-6
Dennis R.L.H., Shreeve T.G. & Van Dyck H. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102(2): 417–426. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12492.x
Dierks A. & Fischer K. 2009. Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation. Biodivers. Conserv. 18(13): 3663–3676. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9670-y
Dolek M. 1994. Der Einfluss der Schafbeweidung von Kalkmagerrasen in der Südlichen Frankenalb auf die Insektenfauna (Tagfalter, Heuschrecken). pp. 113–122. In: Nentwig W. & Poehling H.-M. (eds), Schriftenreihe Agrarökologie, Band 10, Haupt Verlag, Bern, 126 pp. ISBN: 3258049556
Dolek M. & Geyer A. 2002. Conserving biodiversity on calcareous grasslands in the Franconian Jura by grazing: a comprehensive approach. Biol. Conserv. 104(3): 351–360. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00200-2
Donald P.F., Green R.E. & Heath M.F. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 268(1462): 25–29. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
Dover J.W., Rescia A., Fungarino S., Fairburn J., Carey P., Lunt P., Dennis R.L.H. & Dover C.J. 2010. Can hay harvesting detrimentally affect adult butterfly abundance? J. Insect Conserv. 14(4): 413–418. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9267-5
Ebert G. & Rennwald E. 1991. Die Schmetterflinge Baden-Württembergs, Band 2: Tagfalter II. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 535 pp. ISBN: 3800134594
Farkač J., Král D. & Škorpík M. 2005. Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Bezobratlí [List of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates]. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha, 760 pp. ISBN: 80-86064-96-4
Fiedler K. 2006. Ant-associates of Palaearctic lycaenid butterfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) — a review. Myrmecologische Nachrichten 9: 77–87.
Forister M.L. 2005. Influence of host plant phenology on Mitoura nelsoni (Lepidoptera: Lyeaenidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98(3): 295–301. DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0295: IOHPPO]2.0.CO;2
Fric Z., Klímová M. & Konvička M. 2006. Mechanical design indicates differences in mobility among butterfly generations. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8(8): 1511–1522.
Gorbunov Y.P. 2001. The butterflies of Russia: classification, genitalia, keys for identification (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea a Papilionoidea). Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, 320 pp. ISBN: 5941310048
Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 332 pp. ISBN: 0198540655
Hluchý M. 2007. Motýli a pesticidy: ošetřování vinic a CHKO Pálava. Živa 5: 217–220.
Chytrý M., Kučera T. & Kočí M. 2001. Katalog biotopů České republiky. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha, 304 pp. ISBN: 80-86064-55-7
Kadlec T., Beneš J., Jarošík V. & Konvička M. 2008. Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landsc. Urban Plan. 85(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.007
Kadlec T., Vrba P., Kepka P., Schmitt T. & Konvička M. 2010. Tracking the decline of the once-common butterfly: delayed oviposition, demography and population genetics in the hermit Chazara briseis. Anim. Conserv. 13(2): 172–183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00318.x
Kadlec T., Vrba P. & Konvička M. 2009. Microhabitat requirements of caterpillars of the critically endangered butterfly Chazara briseis (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in the Czech Republic. Nota Lepid. 32(1): 39–46.
Kleijn D., Kohler F., Baldi A., Batary P., Concepcion E.D., Clough Y., Diaz M., Gabriel D., Holzschuh A., Knop E., Kovacs A., Marshall E.J.P., Tscharntke T. & Verhulst J. 2009. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and landuse intensity in Europe. Proc. Roy. Soc. B — Biol. Sci. 276: 903–909. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1509
Konvička M., Beneš J. & Čížek L. 2005. Ohrožený hmyz nelesních stanovišť: Ochrana a management. Sagittaria, Olomouc, 127 pp. ISBN: 80-239-6590-5
Konvička M., Beneš J., Čížek O., Kopeček F., Konvička O. & Vítaz L. 2008. How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J. Insect Conserv. 12(5): 519–525. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7
Konvička M., Fric Z. & Beneš J. 2006. Butterfly extinctions in European states: do socioeconomic conditions matter more than physical geography? Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15: 82–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00188.x
Krauss J., Steffan-Dewenter I., Muller C.B. & Tscharntke T. 2005. Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly. Ecography 28(4): 465–474. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04201.x
Krauss J., Steffan-Dewenter I. & Tscharntke T. 2004. Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol. Conserv. 120(3): 355–361. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.007
Kudrna O. 1998. Die Tagfalterfauna der Rhön. Oedippus 15: 1–158. ISBN: 1436-5804
Kudrna O. 2002. The Distribution Atlas of European Butterflies. Oedippus, Schweinfurt, 344 pp.
Mihoci I. & Šašić M. 2006. New data on the distribution of the Chapman’s blue Polyommatus thersites (Cantener, 1835) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Croatia. Entomologia Croatica 10(1–2): 7–14.
Mihoci I., Vajdić M. & Šašić M. 2006. The status of the damon blue Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damon (Denis & Shiffermüller, 1775) (Papilionoidea: Lycaenidae, Polyommatini) in the Croatian butterfly fauna. Nat. Croat. 15(1–2): 15–25.
Morris M.G. 1967. Differences Between the Invertebrate Faunas of Grazed and Ungrazed Chalk Grassland, I. Responses of Some Phytophagous insects to Cessation of Grazing. J. Appl. Ecol. 4(2): 459–474.
Morris M.G. 2000. The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 95(2): 129–142. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00028-8
Murphy D.D., Menninger M.S., Ehrlich P.R. & Wilcox B.A. 1986. Local-population dynamics of adult butterflies and the conservation status of 2 closely related species. Biol. Conserv. 37(3): 201–223. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90082-0
Nässig W.A., Dorow W.H.O. & Flechtner G. 2004. Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damon ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) in der hessischen Rhön wieder nachgewiesen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.F. 25(1/2): 15–20.
Oliver T., Roy D.B., Hill J.K., Brereton T. & Thomas C.D. 2010. Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability. Ecol. Lett. 13(4): 473–484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01441.x
Pokluda P., Hauck D. & Čížek L. 2012. Importance of marginal habitats for grassland diversity: Fallows and overgrown tall-grass steppe as key habitats of endangered ground-beetle Carabus hungaricus. Insect Conserv. Diver. 5(1): 27–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00146.x
Poschlod P., Bakker J.P. & Kahmen S. 2005. Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6(2): 93–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2004.12.001
Rosin Z.M., Skorka P., Lenda M., Moron D., Sparks T.H. & Tryjanowski P. 2011. Increasing patch area, proximity of human settlement and larval food plants positively affect the occurrence and local population size of the habitat specialist butterfly Polyommatus coridon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in fragmented calcareous grasslands. Eur. J. Entomol. 108(1):99–106
Roy D.B. & Thomas J.A. 2003. Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin. Oecologia 134(3): 439–444. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1121-3
Samways M.J. & Lu S.S. 2007. Key traits in a threatened butterfly and its common sibling: implications for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 16(14): 4095–4107. DOI: 0.1007/s10531-007-9209-z
Sang A., Teder T., Helm A. & Partel M. 2010. Indirect evidence for an extinction debt of grassland butterflies half century after habitat loss. Biol. Conserv. 143(6): 1405–1413. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.015
Schtickzelle N., Turlure C. & Baguette M. 2007. Grazing management impacts on the viability of the threatened bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Biol. Conserv. 136(4): 651–660. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.012
Schwarz R. 1948. Motýli denní II. Vesmír, Praha, 49 pp.
Settele J., Shreeve T., Konvička M. & Van Dyck H. 2009. Part 5. Global Change and Conservation, pp. 315–370. In: Settele J., Shreeve T., Konvička M. & Van Dyck H. (eds), Ecology of Butterflies in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 526 pp. ISBN: 9780521766975, 9780521747592
Stoate C., Boatman N.D., Borralho R.J., Carvalho C.R., de Snoo G.R. & Eden P. 2001. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J. Environ. Manage. 63(4): 337–365. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0473
Thomas C.D., Wilson R.J. & Lewis O.T. 2002. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 269(1491): 563–569. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1939
Thomas J.A. 1993. Holocene climate changes and warm manmade refugia may explain why a 6th of British butterflies posess unnatural early-successional habitats. Ecography 16(3): 278–284. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1993.tb00217.x
Thomas J.A., Bourn N.A.D., Clarke R.T., Stewart K.E., Simcox D.J., Pearman G.S., Curtis R. & Goodger B. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B -Biol. Sci. 268(1478): 1791–1796. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1693
Tolman T. & Lewington R. 2009. Collins Butterfly Guide: The Most Complete Guide to the Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins Publishers, London, 384 pp. ISBN: 9780007279777
Turlure C., Choutt J., Van Dyck H., Baguette M. & Schtickzelle N. 2010. Functional habitat area as a reliable proxy for population size: case study using two butterfly species of conservation concern. J. Insect Conserv. 14(4): 379–388. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9269-3
Van Swaay C., Cuttelod A., Collins S., Maes D., Lopez Munguira M., Sasic M., Settele J., Verovnik R., Verstrael R., Warren M., Wiemers M. & Wynhof I. 2010. European Red List of Butterflies. IUCN, Butterfly Conservation Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 44 pp. ISBN: 978-92-79-14151-5, DOI: 10.2779/83897
Warren M.S., Hill J.K., Thomas J.A., Asher J., Fox R., Huntley B., Roy D.B., Telfer M.G., Jeffcoate S., Harding P., Jeffcoate G., Willis S.G., Greatorex-Davies J.N., Moss D. & Thomas C.D. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414(6859): 65–69. DOI: 10.1038/35102054
Weidemann H.J. 1995. Tagfalter: beobachten, bestimmen, 2. Auflage [in diesem Band], Augsburg, 659 pp. ISBN: 3-89440-115-X
Wenzel M., Schmitt T., Weitzel M. & Seitz A. 2006. The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: A conservation problem. Biol. Conserv. 128(4): 542–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.022
Zsolt B. 2004. Fajmegörzési tervek. Csíkos boglárka (Polyommatus damon). Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Minisztérium, Természetvédelmi Hivatal, 13 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šlancarová, J., Bednářová, B., Beneš, J. et al. How life history affects threat status: Requirements of two Onobrychis-feeding lycaenid butterflies, Polyommatus damon and Polyommatus thersites, in the Czech Republic. Biologia 67, 1175–1185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0109-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0109-7