Number of the records: 1
What’s in a name? Perceptions and promotion of responsible research and innovation practices across Europe
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0531347 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title What’s in a name? Perceptions and promotion of responsible research and innovation practices across Europe Author(s) Christensen, M. V. (DK)
Nieminen, M. (FI)
Altenhofer, M. (GB)
Tangcoigne, E. (FR)
Mejlgaard, N. (DK)
Griessler, E. (AT)
Filáček, Adolf (FLU-F) RID, ORCID, SAISource Title Science and Public Policy. - : Oxford University Press - ISSN 0302-3427
Roč. 47, č. 3 (2020), s. 360-370Number of pages 11 s. Publication form Online - E Language eng - English Country GB - United Kingdom Keywords responsible research and innovation ; responsible practices ; research performing and funding organizations ; Europe ; descriptive analysis Subject RIV AE - Management ; Administration OECD category Organisation theory Method of publishing Limited access Institutional support FLU-F - RVO:67985955 UT WOS 000593175200006 EID SCOPUS 85089201192 DOI 10.1093/scipol/scaa018 Annotation After a decade of efforts to mainstream Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) across Europe, the policy momentum is now uncertain. We explore how 217 organisations perceive responsibility in relation to their work, what mechanisms they apply to promote responsible practices, and what hindrances to promoting RRI they observe. Most organisations are unfamiliar with RRI but employ diverse perceptions of responsibility and mechanisms to promote it nonetheless. Civil society organisations are primarily outward oriented, collaborating with others and hosting science events. Private companies are more internally focussed and more likely to formalise this effort in strategies and internal guidelines. Universities resemble private companies, while private and public funders use funding-specific tools to incentivise responsible practices. Our results suggest that RRI is still poorly institutionalised and that some areas lack attention among actors in the research and innovation systems. Future policy endeavours might benefit from addressing deficits and tapping into existing perceptions of responsibility. Workplace Institute of Philosophy Contact Chlumská Simona, chlumska@flu.cas.cz ; Tichá Zuzana, asep@flu.cas.cz Tel: 221 183 360 Year of Publishing 2021 Electronic address https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa018
Number of the records: 1