Number of the records: 1  

Structure and Bonding in Binuclear Metal Carbonyls. Classical Paradigms vs. Insights from Modern Theoretical Calculations

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0440336
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleStructure and Bonding in Binuclear Metal Carbonyls. Classical Paradigms vs. Insights from Modern Theoretical Calculations
    Author(s) Ponec, Robert (UCHP-M) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Source TitleComputational and Theoretical Chemistry - ISSN 2210-271X
    Roč. 1053, SI (2015), s. 195-213
    Number of pages19 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNL - Netherlands
    Keywordsbinuclear metal carbonyls ; DAFH analysis ; 18-electron rule
    Subject RIVCC - Organic Chemistry
    Institutional supportUCHP-M - RVO:67985858
    UT WOS000349591600023
    EID SCOPUS84920997150
    DOI10.1016/j.comptc.2014.07.018
    AnnotationThe nature of the bonding interactions in a series of bridged and unbridged binuclear metal carbonyls has been analyzed using the visual insights provided by the analysis of domain averaged Fermi holes (DAFH). Picture of the bonding emerging from this analysis has been confronted with the predictions anticipated in each particular case by the traditional bonding paradigms exemplified by the 18-electron rule and isolobal analogy. Such a confrontation has shown that the frequently observed inconsistencies, especially in what concerns the eventual existence and/or multiplicity of direct metal–metal bonds, are due to simplistic interpretation of 18-electron rule that primarily relies on formal electron count and qualitative consideration of metal–metal distances without taking into account the actual bonding capabilities of individual M(CO)n fragments. The systematic scrutiny of the results of DAFH analysis for the wide series of studied carbonyls allowed to reveal the shortcomings of the original simplistic interpretation and to propose a slight reinterpretation of 18-electron rule that makes its predictions consistent with theinsights of moderns theoretical tools.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Chemical Process Fundamentals
    ContactEva Jirsová, jirsova@icpf.cas.cz, Tel.: 220 390 227
    Year of Publishing2016
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.