Number of the records: 1  

Screening for autism in preterm children with extremely low and very low birth weight

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0433116
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleScreening for autism in preterm children with extremely low and very low birth weight
    Author(s) Dudová, I. (CZ)
    Kašparová, M. (CZ)
    Marková, D. (CZ)
    Zemánková, J. (CZ)
    Beranová, Š. (CZ)
    Urbánek, Tomáš (PSU-E) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Hrdlička, M. (CZ)
    Source TitleNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. - : Dove Medical Press Ltd. - ISSN 1176-6328
    Roč. 10, Feb (2014), s. 277-282
    Number of pages6 s.
    Publication formOnline - E
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNZ - New Zealand
    Keywordsautism spectrum disorder ; preterm children ; screening
    Subject RIVAN - Psychology
    Institutional supportPSU-E - RVO:68081740
    UT WOS000331079900001
    EID SCOPUS84896733222
    DOI10.2147/NDT.S57057
    AnnotationStudies of children with very low birth weight (VLBW, 1,000–1,500 g) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW, less than 1,000 g) indicate that this population seems to be at increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Parents of 101 VLBW and ELBW children (age 2 years, corrected for prematurity) agreed to participate in the study and signed informed consents; however, parents of only 75 children (44 boys, 31 girls) completed the screening questionnaires. The screening battery included the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT), Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-ITC), and the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile (ITSP). Children with disabilities were excluded. All children who screened positive on any of the screening tools were subsequently invited for a detailed assessment. Thirty-two children (42.7%) screened positive on at least one of the screening questionnaires. The screening tool with the most positive results was the CSBS-DP-ITC (26 positive screens), followed by the M-CHAT (19 positive screens) and the ITSP (11 positive screens). Of the 32 children who tested positive, 19 participated in the detailed follow-up assessment. A diagnosis of ASD was confirmed in eight of the 19 children. ASD prevalence, calculated from those 19 children and those with negative screening results (43 children), yielded a prevalence of 12.9% in the sample. The difference in frequency of positive screens between the tests was significant (P=0.011). In pair comparisons, ITSP was found to be significantly less positive than CSBS-DP-ITC (P=0.032). No significant differences were found between the M-CHAT and CSBS-DP-ITC or between the M-CHAT and ITSP. The results strongly support the hypothesis of an increased prevalence of autism in children with a birth weight less than 1,500 g.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Psychology
    ContactŠtěpánka Halamová, Halamova@praha.psu.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 222 096
    Year of Publishing2015
    Electronic addresshttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S57057
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.