Number of the records: 1  

Gaussian Process Surrogate Models for the CMA Evolution Strategy

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0498868
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleGaussian Process Surrogate Models for the CMA Evolution Strategy
    Author(s) Bajer, L. (CZ)
    Pitra, Z. (CZ)
    Repický, J. (CZ)
    Holeňa, Martin (UIVT-O) SAI, RID
    Source TitleEvolutionary Computation. - : MIT Press - ISSN 1063-6560
    Roč. 27, č. 4 (2019), s. 665-697
    Number of pages33 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryUS - United States
    KeywordsBlack-box optimization ; CMA-ES ; Gaussian processes ; evolution strategies ; surrogate modeling
    Subject RIVIN - Informatics, Computer Science
    OECD categoryComputer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
    R&D ProjectsGA17-01251S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    GA18-18080S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Method of publishingLimited access
    Institutional supportUIVT-O - RVO:67985807
    UT WOS000500189000005
    EID SCOPUS85070618753
    DOI10.1162/evco_a_00244
    AnnotationThis article deals with Gaussian process surrogate models for the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy (CMA-ES)—several already existing and two by the authors recently proposed models are presented. The work discusses different variants of surrogate model exploitation and focuses on the benefits of employing the Gaussian process uncertainty prediction, especially during the selection of points for the evaluation with a surrogate model. The experimental part of the paper thoroughly compares and evaluates the five presented Gaussian process surrogate and six other state-of-the-art optimizers on the COCO benchmarks. The algorithm presented in most detail, DTS-CMA-ES, which combines cheap surrogate-model predictions with the objective function evaluations in every iteration, is shown to approach the function optimum at least comparably fast and often faster than the state-of-the-art black-box optimizers for budgets of roughly 25–100 function evaluations per dimension, in 10- and lessdimensional spaces even for 25–250 evaluations per dimension.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Computer Science
    ContactTereza Šírová, sirova@cs.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 053 800
    Year of Publishing2020
    Electronic addresshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00244
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.