Number of the records: 1  

Determination of U, Th and K in bricks by gamma -ray spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence analysis and neutron activation analysis

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0479667
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleDetermination of U, Th and K in bricks by gamma -ray spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence analysis and neutron activation analysis
    Author(s) Bártová, H. (CZ)
    Kučera, Jan (UJF-V) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Musílek, L. (CZ)
    Trojek, T. (CZ)
    Gregorová, E. (CZ)
    Number of authors5
    Source TitleRadiation Physics and Chemistry. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0969-806X
    Roč. 140, NOV (2017), s. 161-166
    Number of pages6 s.
    Publication formPrint - P
    Languageeng - English
    CountryGB - United Kingdom
    KeywordsGamma-ray spectrometry ; neutron activation analysis ; environmental dosimetry
    Subject RIVCB - Analytical Chemistry, Separation
    OECD categoryAnalytical chemistry
    R&D ProjectsLM2015056 GA MŠMT - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS)
    Institutional supportUJF-V - RVO:61389005
    UT WOS000411533500031
    EID SCOPUS85011340408
    DOI10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.01.035
    AnnotationKnowledge of the content of natural radionuclides in bricks can be important in some cases in dosimetry and application of ionizing radiation. Dosimetry of naturally occurring radionuclides in matter (NORM) in general is one of them, the other one, related to radiation protection, is radon exposure evaluation, and finally, it is needed for the thermoluminescence (TL) dating method. The internal dose rate inside bricks is caused mostly by contributions of the natural radionuclides U-238, Th-232, radionuclides of their decay chains, and 40K. The decay chain of U-238 is usually much less important.

    The concentrations of U-238, Th-232 and K-40 were measured by various methods, namely by gamma -ray spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), and neutron activation analysis (NAA) which was used as a reference method. These methods were compared from the point of view of accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), amount of sample needed and sample handling, time demands, and instrument availability.
    WorkplaceNuclear Physics Institute
    ContactMarkéta Sommerová, sommerova@ujf.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 173 228
    Year of Publishing2018
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.