Number of the records: 1  

Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0475939
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleComparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues
    Author(s) Faktor, J. (CZ)
    Suchá, Rita (UZFG-Y) ORCID
    Páralová, V. (CZ)
    Liu, Y. (CH)
    Bouchal, P. (CZ)
    Article number1600323
    Source TitleProteomics. - : Wiley - ISSN 1615-9853
    Roč. 17, č. 5 (2017)
    Number of pages6 s.
    Publication formPrint - P
    Languageeng - English
    CountryDE - Germany
    Keywordscancer ; MRM/SRM ; SWATH
    Subject RIVEI - Biotechnology ; Bionics
    OECD categoryTechnologies involving identifying the functioning of DNA, proteins and enzymes and how they influence the onset of disease and maintenance of well-being (gene-based diagnostics and therapeutic interventions (pharmacogenomics, gene-based therapeutics)
    R&D ProjectsLO1609 GA MŠMT - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS)
    Institutional supportUZFG-Y - RVO:67985904
    UT WOS000397390800006
    EID SCOPUS85013414422
    DOI10.1002/pmic.201600323
    AnnotationTargeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches enable the simultaneous and reproducible quantification of multiple protein analytes across numerous conditions in biology and clinical studies. These approaches involve e.g. selected reaction monitoring (SRM) typically conducted on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, its high-resolution variant named pseudo-SRM (p-SRM), carried out in a quadrupole coupled with an TOF analyzer (qTOF), and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spektra (SWATH). Here we compared these methods in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), coefficient of variance (CV), fold change (FC), limit of detection and quantitation (LOD, LOQ). We have shown the highest S/N for p-SRM mode, followed by SRM and SWATH, demonstrating a trade-off between sensitivity and level of multiplexing for SRM, p-SRM, and SWATH. SRM was more sensitive than p-SRM based on determining their LOD and LOQ. Although SWATH has the worst S/N, it enables peptidemultiplexing with post-acquisition definition of the targets, leading to better proteome coverage. FC between breast tumors of different clinical-pathological characteristics were highly correlated (R-2>0.97) across three methods and consistent with the previous study on 96 tumor tissues. Our technical note presented here, therefore, confirmed that outputs of all the three methods were biologically relevant and highly applicable to cancer research.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Animal Physiology and Genetics
    ContactJana Zásmětová, knihovna@iapg.cas.cz, Tel.: 315 639 554
    Year of Publishing2018
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.