Number of the records: 1  

Practising Comparison

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0462087
    Document TypeM - Monograph Chapter
    R&D Document TypeMonograph Chapter
    TitleFrame Against the Grain: Asymmetries, Interference, and the Politics of EU Comparison
    Author(s) Stöckelová, Tereza (SOU-Z) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Source TitlePractising Comparison. - Manchester : Mattering Press, 2016 / Deville J. ; Guggenheim M. ; Hrdličková Z. - ISBN 978-0-9931449-4-3
    Pagess. 166-186
    Number of pages21 s.
    Number of copy500
    Number of pages321
    Publication formPrint - P
    Languageeng - English
    CountryGB - United Kingdom
    Keywordsacademic knowledge ; comparison ; EU research
    Subject RIVAO - Sociology, Demography
    R&D ProjectsGAP404/11/0127 GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Institutional supportSOU-Z - RVO:68378025
    AnnotationThis chapter reflects on two interrelated research projects the author was involved in between 2006 and 2010. Both projects intended to make multiple comparisons between European countries, between ‘East and West’, selected academic disciplines, and different types of research institutions. At the same time, the investigated realities already involved a number of framings such as assessment exercises comparing the ‘research performance’ of teams (in an institute) or researcher organisations (in a country). This chapter looks into how and with what (collateral) effects we as researchers practised comparisons in these two projects: What was taken as the frame of comparison? How did researchers’ framings interfere with those of research participants? How were the frames reflected, taken into account, or made an object of inquiry sui generis? What epistemic and geopolitical asymmetries were embedded in our practices of comparison, and how may they have become destabilised over the course of the two projects? It argues that while we cannot stop framing, there are alternatives to how we compare, and we should try to frame (in the EU projects) ‘against the grain’. It suggests that we should be more courageous and challenging in relation to epistemologically and politically established framings.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Sociology
    ContactEva Nechvátalová, eva.nechvatalova@soc.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 220 924 / linka 351
    Year of Publishing2017
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.