Number of the records: 1
Birds use eggshell UV reflectance when recognizing non-mimetic parasitic eggs
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0453785 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title Birds use eggshell UV reflectance when recognizing non-mimetic parasitic eggs Author(s) Šulc, Michal (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
Procházka, Petr (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
Čapek, Miroslav (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
Honza, Marcel (UBO-W) RID, SAI, ORCIDNumber of authors 4 Source Title Behavioral Ecology. - : Oxford University Press - ISSN 1045-2249
Roč. 27, č. 2 (2016), s. 677-684Number of pages 8 s. Language eng - English Country US - United States Keywords brood parasitism ; common cuckoo ; egg recognition ; Eurasian reed warbler ; mimicry ; parasitic egg ; ultraviolet (UV) reflectance Subject RIV EG - Zoology R&D Projects IAA600930903 GA AV ČR - Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AV ČR) GAP506/12/2404 GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF) Institutional support UBO-W - RVO:68081766 UT WOS 000375398800043 EID SCOPUS 84964691909 DOI 10.1093/beheco/arv206 Annotation Brood parasitism generally has detrimental effect on host fitness. To avoid the negative consequences of brood parasitism, hosts have often evolved an effective counter-adaptation—recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs. Because eggshells of the Eurasian reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and its brood parasite, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), differ significantly in their ultraviolet (UV) reflectance, one would expect that the ability of the hosts to see UV light will play an important role in recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs. To test this assumption, we performed 3 sets of experiments differing in the level of mimicry of the parasitic egg. In the first 2 experiments, we parasitized host nests by conspecific eggs (either own or from other females with perfect and good mimicry, respectively) coated either with a UV blocker (completely reducing UV reflectance of the eggshell) or with Vaseline as a control treatment. Although the UV blocker significantly decreased eggshell UV reflectance, hosts accepted most of these conspecific eggs and the type of coating did not significantly affect the probability of rejection. In the third experiment, we parasitized clutches with 2 types of non-mimetic eggs differing only in UV reflectance (UV− and UV+). We found that hosts rejected UV+ eggs at a significantly higher rate than UV− eggs, probably due to their lower mimicry in the UV spectrum. Here, we demonstrated that hosts use UV signals during egg recognition. Moreover, we suggest that such signals may play a more important role when the parasitic egg is non-mimetic rather than mimetic, when hosts can use additional cues, such as spotting pattern. Workplace Institute of Vertebrate Biology Contact Hana Slabáková, slabakova@ivb.cz, Tel.: 543 422 524 Year of Publishing 2017
Number of the records: 1