Number of the records: 1  

Neglected tick-borne pathogens in the Czech Republic, 2011–2014

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0451408
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleNeglected tick-borne pathogens in the Czech Republic, 2011–2014
    Author(s) Venclíková, Kristýna (UBO-W)
    Mendel, Jan (UBO-W) RID, SAI, SAI, ORCID
    Betášová, Lenka (UBO-W) SAI, RID
    Blažejová, Hana (UBO-W) SAI
    Jedličková, Petra (UBO-W) SAI, SAI
    Straková, Petra (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Hubálek, Zdeněk (UBO-W) RID, SAI, ORCID
    Rudolf, Ivo (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Number of authors8
    Source TitleTicks and Tick-borne Diseases - ISSN 1877-959X
    Roč. 7, č. 1 (2016), s. 107-112
    Number of pages6 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryDE - Germany
    KeywordsIxodes ricinus ; Rickettsia spp. ; Candidatus N. mikurensis ; Anaplasma phagocytophilum ; Babesia spp.
    Subject RIVFN - Epidemiology, Contagious Diseases ; Clinical Immunology
    Institutional supportUBO-W - RVO:68081766
    UT WOS000366953400016
    EID SCOPUS84947430155
    DOI10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.09.004
    AnnotationIn this study, we screened a total of 2473 questing (years 2011–2014) and 199 engorged (years 2013 and 2014) Ixodes ricinus ticks for the presence of Rickettsia pp., “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Babesia spp. Host-seeking ticks were collected at three study sites corresponding to natural woodland, urban park and pastureland ecosystem, and analyzed using molecular techniques. All pathogens tested were present at all study sites. The prevalence rates for Rickettsia spp., "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis", Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Babesia spp. ranged from 2.6% to 9.2%, 0.8% to 11.6%, 0% to 12.1%, and 0% to 5.2%, respectively. Engorged I. ricinus ticks collected from sheep on pastureland in the years 2013 and 2014 yielded prevalence rates 7.4% and 6.3%, respectively, for Rickettsia spp., 38.5% and 14.1% for "Candidatus N. mikurensis", 18.5% and 12.5% for A. phagocytophilum, and 4.4% and 0.0% for Babesia spp. Monitoring of neglected tick-borne pathogens within the scope of epidemiological surveillance is an important tool for prevention and control of human tick-borne infections.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Vertebrate Biology
    ContactHana Slabáková, slabakova@ivb.cz, Tel.: 543 422 524
    Year of Publishing2017
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.