Number of the records: 1  

Ecosystems emerging. 5: Constraints

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0434938
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleEcosystems emerging. 5: Constraints
    Author(s) Patten, B. C. (US)
    Straškraba, Milan (BC-A)
    Jorgensen, S. E. (DK)
    Number of authors3
    Source TitleEcological Modelling. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0304-3800
    Roč. 222, č. 16 (2011), s. 2945-2972
    Number of pages28 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNL - Netherlands
    Keywordsconstraint ; epistemic ; ontic
    Subject RIVEH - Ecology, Behaviour
    CEZAV0Z50070508 - ENTU-I, BC-A (2005-2011)
    UT WOS000294983700012
    EID SCOPUS80051474421
    DOI10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.019
    AnnotationSolutions proliferate further constraints in an unending spiral of problem (constraint) generation and solution. As constraints proliferate, behavior narrows, and species diversify to compensate (paradox of constraint). Resource enrichment reduces constraints, releases behavior, and reduction of challenges decreases diversity (paradox of enrichment) high diversity is expressed in low-resource environments and low diversity in high-resource environments. A three-part model of constraints is formulated for non-living systems, and also for goal-directed, problem-solving biota. Mode 1: dynamical means behavior is co-determined by internal states and external inputs. Mode 2: cybernetic employs negative feedback to keep dynamics within goal-oriented operating limits. Mode 3: model-making entails ability to represent (model) physical reality and respond to both phenomenal (modeled) and physical inputs; this property distinguishes living from nonliving systems. Principal sections of the paper elaborate dynamical constraints (three classes), boundary constraints (expressed in edge effects and trophic dynamics), physical constraints (space, time, temperature), chemical constraints (environment fitness, ecological stoichiometry, chemical evolution, limiting factors), coding constraints (environmental vs. genetic coding), network and pathway constraints (connectivity), and natural selection constraints (fitting to the biosphere). Consideration of how the world would look without constraints suggests how fundamental these are in ecosystem emergence, and how the next property in this series, differentiation, would be unmotivated without them. We conclude that constraints as a category are under-studied in ecology, poorly understood in ecological phenomenology, and (our hypothesis) comprise a ubiquitous organizing force in nature.
    WorkplaceBiology Centre (since 2006)
    ContactDana Hypšová, eje@eje.cz, Tel.: 387 775 214
    Year of Publishing2015
    Electronic addresshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011002274
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.