Number of the records: 1
Viola montana and V. persicifolia (Violaceae): Two names to be rejected
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0364063 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title Viola montana and V. persicifolia (Violaceae): Two names to be rejected Author(s) Danihelka, Jiří (BU-J) RID, ORCID
van den Hof, K. (NL)
Marcussen, T. (SE)
Jonsell, B. (SE)Number of authors 4 Source Title Taxon. - : Wiley - ISSN 0040-0262
Roč. 59, č. 6 (2010), s. 1869-1878Number of pages 10 s. Language eng - English Country NL - Netherlands Keywords nomenclature ; typification ; Viola elatior Subject RIV EF - Botanics R&D Projects LC06073 GA MŠMT - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) CEZ AV0Z60050516 - BU-J (2005-2011) UT WOS 000285566000019 Annotation The taxonomic and nomenclatural histories of Viola elatior Fr. (1828), V. pumila Chaix (1785) and V. stagnina Kit. ex Schult. (1814) are discussed. The names V. stagnina and V. elatior are lectotypified with specimens corresponding to the current use of these names. The neglected lectotypification in 1988 of V. montana L. (1753) with a specimen referable to V. elatior is reviewed. The name V. persicifolia Schreb. (1771) is analysed in detail, and we conclude that this name should be interpreted as referring also to V. elatior. In addition the types of V. hornemanniana Schult. (1819) and V. stipulacea Hartm. (1820) are conspecific with V. elatior. The use of V. persicifolia and V. montana, representing earlier legitimate names for the species widely known as V. elatior, and we herein recommend these two names for rejection in order to assure nomenclatural clarity and stability. We recommend conservation of V. elatior against V. hornemanniana and V. stipulacea. Workplace Institute of Botany Contact Martina Bartošová, martina.bartosova@ibot.cas.cz, ibot@ibot.cas.cz, Tel.: 271 015 242 ; Marie Jakšová, marie.jaksova@ibot.cas.cz, Tel.: 384 721 156-8 Year of Publishing 2012
Number of the records: 1