Number of the records: 1
Towards a new paradigm in mayfly phylogeny (Ephemeroptera): combined analysis of morphological and molecular data
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0331287 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title Towards a new paradigm in mayfly phylogeny (Ephemeroptera): combined analysis of morphological and molecular data Title Fylogeneze jepic (Ephemeroptera): první kombinovaná analýza morfologických a molekulárních dat Author(s) Ogden, T. H. (US)
Gattolliat, J. L. (CH)
Sartori, M. (CH)
Staniczek, A. H. (DE)
Soldán, Tomáš (BC-A) RID
Whiting, M. F. (US)Number of authors 6 Source Title Systematic Entomology. - : Wiley - ISSN 0307-6970
Roč. 34, č. 4 (2009), s. 616-634Number of pages 19 s. Language eng - English Country GB - United Kingdom Keywords Ephemeroptera ; phylogeny ; morfological a molecular data Subject RIV EB - Genetics ; Molecular Biology R&D Projects 1QS500070505 GA AV ČR - Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AV ČR) CEZ AV0Z50070508 - ENTU-I, BC-A (2005-2011) UT WOS 000269907500003 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00488.x Annotation This study represents the first formal morphological and combined (morphological and molecular) phylogenetic analyses of the order Ephemeroptera. Taxonomic sampling comprised 112 species in 107 genera, including 42 recognized families (all major lineages of Ephemeroptera). Morphological data consisted of 101 morphological characters. Molecular data were acquired from DNA sequences of the 12S, 16S, 18S, 28S and H3 genes. The Asian genus Siphluriscus (Siphluriscidae) was supported as sister to all other mayflies. The lineages Carapacea, Furcatergalia, Fossoriae, Pannota, Caenoidea and Ephemerelloidea were supported as monophyletic, as were many of the families. However, some recognized families (for example, Ameletopsidae and Coloburiscidae) and major lineages (such as Setisura, Pisciforma and Ephemeroidea among others) were not supported as monophyletic, mainly due to convergences within nymphal characters. Clade robustness was evaluated by multiple methods and approaches. Workplace Biology Centre (since 2006) Contact Dana Hypšová, eje@eje.cz, Tel.: 387 775 214 Year of Publishing 2010
Number of the records: 1