- Indestructibility of some compactness principles over models of PFA
Number of the records: 1  

Indestructibility of some compactness principles over models of PFA

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0576355
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleIndestructibility of some compactness principles over models of PFA
    Author(s) Honzík, R. (CZ)
    Lambie-Hanson, Christopher (MU-W) SAI, ORCID
    Stejskalová, Š. (CZ)
    Article number103359
    Source TitleAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0168-0072
    Roč. 175, č. 1 (2024)
    Number of pages17 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNL - Netherlands
    KeywordsGuessing models ; indestructibility ; the tree property ; weak Kurepa Hypothesis
    Subject RIVBA - General Mathematics
    OECD categoryPure mathematics
    Method of publishingLimited access
    Institutional supportMU-W - RVO:67985840
    UT WOS001078824100001
    EID SCOPUS85171791208
    DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2023.103359
    AnnotationWe show that PFA (Proper Forcing Axiom) implies that adding any number of Cohen subsets of ω will not add an ω2-Aronszajn tree or a weak ω1-Kurepa tree, and moreover no σ-centered forcing can add a weak ω1-Kurepa tree (a tree of height and size ω1 with at least ω2 cofinal branches). This partially answers an open problem whether ccc forcings can add ω2-Aronszajn trees or ω1-Kurepa trees (with ¬□ω in the latter case). We actually prove more: We show that a consequence of PFA, namely the guessing model principle, GMP, which is equivalent to the ineffable slender tree property, ISP, is preserved by adding any number of Cohen subsets of ω. And moreover, GMP implies that no σ-centered forcing can add a weak ω1-Kurepa tree (see Section 2.1 for definitions). For more generality, we study variations of the principle GMP at higher cardinals and the indestructibility consequences they entail, and as applications we answer a question of Mohammadpour about guessing models at weakly but not strongly inaccessible cardinals and show that there is a model in which there are no weak ℵω+1-Kurepa trees and no ℵω+2-Aronszajn trees.
    WorkplaceMathematical Institute
    ContactJarmila Štruncová, struncova@math.cas.cz, library@math.cas.cz, Tel.: 222 090 757
    Year of Publishing2025
    Electronic addresshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2023.103359
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.