Number of the records: 1  

Examining potential confounding factors in gene expression analysis of human saliva and identifying potential housekeeping genes

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0554844
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleExamining potential confounding factors in gene expression analysis of human saliva and identifying potential housekeeping genes
    Author(s) Ostheim, P. (DE)
    Alemu, S. W. (DE)
    Tichý, A. (CZ)
    Davídková, Marie (UJF-V) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Šťastná, M. (CZ)
    Kultová, G. (CZ)
    Schuele, S. (DE)
    Paunesku, T. (US)
    Woloschak, G. (US)
    Ghandhi, S. A. (US)
    Amundson, S. A. (US)
    Haimerl, M. (DE)
    Stroszczynski, C. (DE)
    Port, M. (DE)
    Abend, M. (DE)
    Number of authors15
    Article number2312
    Source TitleScientific Reports. - : Nature Publishing Group - ISSN 2045-2322
    Roč. 12, č. 1 (2022)
    Number of pages13 s.
    Publication formPrint - P
    Languageeng - English
    CountryDE - Germany
    KeywordsRNA ; diagnostics ; biomarkers
    OECD categoryBiophysics
    Method of publishingOpen access
    Institutional supportUJF-V - RVO:61389005
    UT WOS000754021000035
    EID SCOPUS85124501125
    DOI10.1038/s41598-022-05670-5
    AnnotationIsolation of RNA from whole saliva, a non-invasive and easily accessible biofluid that is an attractive alternative to blood for high-throughput biodosimetry of radiological/nuclear victims might be of clinical significance for prediction and diagnosis of disease. In a previous analysis of 12 human samples we identified two challenges to measuring gene expression from total RNA: (1) the fraction of human RNA in whole saliva was low and (2) the bacterial contamination was overwhelming. To overcome these challenges, we performed selective cDNA synthesis for human RNA species only by employing poly(A)+-tail primers followed by qRT-PCR. In the current study, this approach was independently validated on 91 samples from 61 healthy donors. Additionally, we used the ratio of human to bacterial RNA to adjust the input RNA to include equal amounts of human RNA across all samples before cDNA synthesis, which then ensured comparable analysis using the same base human input material. Furthermore, we examined relative levels of ten known housekeeping genes, and assessed inter- and intra-individual differences in 61 salivary RNA isolates, while considering effects of demographical factors (e.g. sex, age), epidemiological factors comprising social habits (e.g. alcohol, cigarette consumption), oral hygiene (e.g. flossing, mouthwash), previous radiological diagnostic procedures (e.g. number of CT-scans) and saliva collection time (circadian periodic). Total human RNA amounts appeared significantly associated with age only (P <= 0.02). None of the chosen housekeeping genes showed significant circadian periodicity and either did not associate or were weakly associated with the 24 confounders examined, with one exception, 60% of genes were altered by mouthwash. ATP6, ACTB and B2M represented genes with the highest mean baseline expression (Ct-values <= 30) and were detected in all samples. Combining these housekeeping genes for normalization purposes did not decrease inter-individual variance, but increased the robustness. In summary, our work addresses critical confounders and provides important information for the successful examination of gene expression in human whole saliva.
    WorkplaceNuclear Physics Institute
    ContactMarkéta Sommerová, sommerova@ujf.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 173 228
    Year of Publishing2023
    Electronic addresshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05670-5
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.